Laserfiche WebLink
specified in the detail of the Planned Unit Development agreement and refired prior to <br /> Council decisions on the concept. In addition, the issues relating to the gradly1g, utilities an <br /> f ire protection services can be resolved as part of the PUD Agreement and Development Plan <br /> review. An additional neighborhood meeting may be of assistance. If the Comm' s'ion <br /> accepts this recommendation, a project review time extension will be necessary. <br /> 5.0 Plannming Commission Recommendation <br /> On January 13, 1 999, the Planning Commission held a discussion of the issues (see attached <br /> e corpt from the draft minutes). The Planning Conunission then recommended approval of <br /> the proposal (4-2), citing the comments and findings in Section 3 and the recommendation <br /> in Section 4 of this report. <br /> 5.1 The Commission recommended(4-2)approval of the request for an amendment to the itv"s <br /> Comprehensive Plan to change the future land use designation of both parcels to High <br /> Density Residential and approval of the concept development plan for a mixed use planned <br /> unit development including the existing prince of Peace Lutheran Church, a 5 -unit three- <br /> story senior housing wilding, and an off-street parking area, based on the findings outlined <br /> in Section 3, subject to the following conditions <br /> a. Prior to requesting concept approval from the City Council, the applicant will hold <br /> a design meeting with neighbors and interested public (including the Planning <br /> Commission members if interested) to identify specific changes in site design and <br /> landscaping, materials, massing, and visual screening from the Labe. <br /> b. The applicant will include wilding design materials (brick, masonry, and natura., <br /> materials) that match those of the existing Church building. <br /> C. The applicant will redesign the building mass to be consistent with the height, width, <br /> and size of the existing Church building. <br /> d. The applicant will request, in writing, the Council on January 25, 1999, accept a 60 <br /> day time extension to the project review process for further design refinement. <br /> If the Council approves the concept PIT and the change in the Comprehensive Plan, the <br /> PUD does not tale effect until after final approvals of the PUD and Subdivision an <br /> respective agreements; and review and approval of the Comprehensive Plan change by the <br /> Metropolitan Council; and publication of the PUD ordnance. <br /> 6.0 SUGGESTED COUNCIL ACTION <br /> The developer has asked, attached in writing, for an additional 60 day extension before submitting <br /> the concept and design documents to the Council for a decision, This will change the dates stated <br /> in the public hearing notice for this request. If approved, an amended notice would be prepared by <br /> staff. <br /> resolution,By approve a 60 day extension from this date (January 25, 1 999) to March 27, 1999, <br /> superceding the previous extension to March 9, 1999, A draft resolution is attached. <br /> PF3049-RCA(01/25/99)-Page 8 of 9 <br />