Laserfiche WebLink
IREQUIEST FOR ITY COUNCIL ACTION <br /> DATE: 3/22/99 <br /> ITEM ISO: J_ <br /> ep ent Approval: Manager A proved: Agenda Section,,LAND USE <br /> I m description: Ric Cox request for vacation of a portion of County load"D" in connection <br /> with the proposed redevelopment of the parcel at the southeast corner of <br /> Fairview Avenue and County Igoact"D'' (3116 Fairview Avenue North) to <br /> allow a small office building. (PF3092). <br /> 1.0 Requested Action <br /> 1.1 <br /> Pic Cox is requesting the vacation of a portion of County load "D" just east of Fairview <br /> Avenue North for the facilitation of renovating the existing 1,000 square foot building into <br /> a 45829 square foot office building. <br /> 2.0 Background <br /> 2.1 In January of 1999, the Roseville City Council approved the concept plan by Mr. Cox to <br /> create a.Planned Unit Development that would allow the renovation of the existing facility <br /> into a new office building. The proposal intends to utilize Cornerstone concepts by bringing <br /> the building closer to the street and providing parking to the rear and screening the parking <br /> area from adjacent residential uses. <br /> 2.2 The concept Planned Unit Development indicated an interest in vacating 12 feet of the <br /> County Road�`D" right-of-way. However, after review and consideration by the Roseville <br /> Engineering Department,only 7-1/2 feet of County Road"D" can be vacated due to existing <br /> utilities. <br /> 2.3 Section 101 3.04 outlines the procedures for vacating streets, alleys,and easements. A public <br /> hearm' g is required. The Planning Commission holds the public hearing and recommends <br /> a vacation action to the City Council. <br /> 3.0 Staff Comment <br /> 3.1 In reviewing this request, staff made the following findings: <br /> It appears that the proposal vacating 7-1/2 feet of County Road"D"right-of-way addresses <br /> the concerns of Amen Hills regarding existing utilities and street configuration, as well as <br /> those of the Roseville Engineering Department regarding the existing sanitary sewer. <br /> Further, it is necessary to remove the northerly portion of the building that includes the <br /> stairwell and the basement, in order to place the remaining portion of the building entirely <br /> on private property <br /> PF3092-RCA(03-22-99)-Page I of 2 <br />