1999_0222_packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

a physical hardship since it was a condition created by the applicant and can be easily modified/corrected. However, because the building is an imposing highly visible structure (hard to mistake for another use),it would be difficult to justify the need for a second identification sign. 3.2 As an alternative to a third sign,the original sign could be moved to a location along county Road"Y%perpendicular to"'D 99 and set back a minimum of 15*from the propel lime. The school sign don Victoria could identify both the school and the Church if moved closer to Victoria and expanded to the 4'x 8 size.both signs could be designed to have reader boards. 3.3 In addition to permitting one sign for the Church and one sign for the school,the City Code does allow for drivewa identification/direction signs that could help direct motorists to the parking areas more effectively. 3.4 In the background packet the City received a letter from a neighbor who has no problem with �o P the sign itself,but asks for better par d ng management,especially on nearby streets, near hydrants,and near intersections. 4.0 Staff Recommendation 4.1 Based on the State Statute and City palm described above,and the fact that the site can be p ut to a reasonable use under the terms of the existing City code and that an alternative sign F lan is available,the staff cannot recommend approval of the requester) variance for an additional free standing monument Church sign. 5.0 Planning Commission Action 5.1 After a public hearing held by the City of Roseville Planning Commission on February 10, 1999,the Commission recommended denial(6-o)of the variance based on the findings in Section 3.0 and the recommendation 'in Section 4.0 of the Request for Planning Commission Action,dated February 10, 1999. 6.0 Suggested Council Action By resolution, (draft attached) deny the request for a variance because no physical hardship could be identified,and the site can he put to a reasonable use under the terms of the elu'sting city Code and because an alternative sign plan is available. Application Deadline schedule:Accepted 01.22.99; -day review time limit 03.24.99 Attachments-.Draft proposed CouncI Resolution Denying the Request;Location Map;Sign Drawing Prepared by: Dennis weisci490-2232} QAPI nning Fiks13W_Luth Church Re$urrection�_RCA( 2 ).dac PF3097-RCA(02-22-99)-page 2 of 2