My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
1999_0125_packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1999
>
1999_0125_packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/30/2011 11:31:39 AM
Creation date
9/30/2011 11:14:08 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
191
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
0 a ty of Roseville Memo <br /> MEMBERS!;!; <br /> Community Development Department Jun 6, 1998 <br /> TOM 0 Steve Sarkozy, City Manager <br /> FROMM Dennis Welsch" <br /> Community Development Director (490-2232) <br /> RE: Midas Muffler Canopy Color <br /> ,doe stranik, President of Midas Muffler has asked that the city reconsider the use of the <br /> color yellow in their awnings, similar to their neighbors to the north who have <br /> incorporated a yellow vinyl window awning into their front window display. Some of the <br /> history of Planning File#1972 is included below: <br /> On May 15, 1 989, Richard Stranik, of Midas asked the City for a brick exterior, with no <br /> "yellow" as requested by the City, eliminating some of the blacktop and adding sod and <br /> shrubs. <br /> On May 27, 1989, R. stranik worked with his architect to add new concrete wall with <br /> brick exterior, and new steel columns on the existing building. <br /> On June 7, 1 989 , stranik agreed to the planning report that recommended "...the <br /> building facia be constructed in off-white...not bright yellow". <br /> On June 24,1989, the council CUP condition #4 stated: " ...the b u i Id ing will be <br /> constructed entirely of brick with white facia panels (no yellow) <br /> Request bz Joe Stranik.0 <br /> Midas now requests clarification - the facia would remain "white", but Midas would like <br /> to add a "yellow" awning. Nothing was specified about this in the CUP. See the <br /> attached awning picture. Frankly, l find the current building to be very stark and bland <br /> architecturally. More landscaping and color would enhance its street appearance. <br /> Since none of the planning staff was here in 1989, 1 think the best approach may be to <br /> ask Council members if they recall -was their intent to keep color off the entire building <br /> or simply off the building facade -which is currently white with black lettering? <br /> Is there time on a work session in June or July to get this clarification? <br /> QACITY-MMMIDASMEM <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.