Laserfiche WebLink
EXTRACT OF MINUTES OF MEETING <br /> OF CITY COUNCIL <br /> CITY OF ROSEVILLE <br /> RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA <br /> Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Roseville, <br /> Minnesota, was duly held at the City Hall in said City on Tuesday, the thirteenth day of November, 200 1, at <br /> 6:30 p m. <br /> The following members were present: and the following were absent: <br /> C o u n c i l p e r s o n introduced and moved the adoption of the following resolution: <br /> RESOLUTION NO. XXXX <br /> RESOLUTION APPROVING PROJECT LOCATIONS FOR THE 2002 PAVEMENT <br /> MANAGEMENT PROGRAM: STREETS, PATHWAYS AND PARKING LOTS <br /> WHEREAS, the Council has reviewed the street, pathway and parking lot construction needs of various <br /> neighborhoods and City properties in the City and has tentatively selected neighborhoods and locations for <br /> inclusion in the 2002 Pavement Management Program; and <br /> WHEREAS, the following locations shall be included in the 2002 Pavement Management Program; <br /> Street Mill and Overlay <br /> Neighborhood Streets From To <br /> 16-Mill and Overlay Lydia Ave Chatsworth St Cul-de-sac <br /> Lydia Dr Lydia Ave Chatsworth St <br /> 24-Mill and Overlay Walnut St County Road C Rose Place <br /> N Hwy 36 Service Drive St. Croix St Long Lake Rd <br /> Rose ate N Hwy 36 Service Dr Cleveland Ave <br /> 25-Mill and Overlay Oakcrest Ave Prior Ave Fairview Ave <br /> Pathways and Parking Lots <br /> Central Park Pathway <br /> Fire Station No. 3 Rear Parking Lot <br /> Howard Johnson Park Parking Lot <br /> NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Roseville, Minnesota as follows: <br /> 1 The locations described in the above table are hereby approved for inclusion in the 2002 Pavement <br /> Management Program. <br /> 2 The proposed improvements are referred to the City Public Works Director for study and he is to advise <br /> the Council as to whether they should be made as proposed or in connection with some other <br /> improvements, and the estimated cost of the improvements as recommended. <br /> The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Councilperson and <br /> upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following <br /> voted against the same: . <br /> Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. <br />