Laserfiche WebLink
ThomasPaschke <br /> C Roseville <br /> 2& Civic Center Drive <br /> Roseville, IVIN 55113 <br /> Mr. Paschke, <br /> This is in response to your communication of July 24,2001. <br /> After watchi the proceedings of the televised council meeting this latest oommunic atlon <br /> m <br /> more related oonoems regarding the proposedUFematory for Rosellawn <br /> ppaft <br /> The ddzens who voiced oonoems at the oour�cil meeting were weU infomned and <br /> well spoken. Coundl members �indicted little or no informatbn orinqairy irrto <br /> health issues raised. Your latest c�orrespondenve do be A— pu t�i the burden for <br /> into ese matters on your c�tizer�s-most ,INce mare neither <br /> chemists nor environt—t <br /> Roseville has sought out experts and consultants to help landscape boulevards. Surely, <br /> exploringth���h issues s�uurrour�ding the proposed crematory requires services of <br /> oonsultantsw�ttexper6seand s+cieMificbadaground. <br /> It Is unconscionable to approve a project without being able to guarantee safety for all. <br /> Y44� on - 9�/d44 <br /> Frances M.Wallraff <br /> 1883AItaVlstaDrive <br /> Roseville, MN 55113 <br />