My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2001_0813_packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2001
>
2001_0813_packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/3/2011 11:55:31 AM
Creation date
10/3/2011 11:40:49 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
292
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
downdraughts due to turbulence downwind of the building should be <br /> Height of building + 0.6 x uncorrected chimney height <br /> d) Clean Air Act, 3rd Memorandum on Chimney Heights. <br /> The 3rd Memorandum methodology is less complex. The pollutant level of <br /> hydrogen chloride is converted to a `sulphur dioxide equivalent' as above, <br /> but this is then multiplied by a 'district factor' which corrects for <br /> background levels of pollutants in different types of area. The uncorrected <br /> stack height is calculated directly from the pollution loading. Following <br /> this, the final chimney height is calculated by adding 0.6 x the uncorrected <br /> chimney height to the maximum height of the building. <br /> e) Secretary of State's Guidance (PG5/3(91) <br /> The Secretary of State guidance lays down that the minimum chimney or <br /> process vent height should be three metres above the roof ridge height of <br /> any building within a distance of five times the uncorrected chimney height, <br /> and in no circumstances should be less than eight metres above ground level. <br /> It is relevant to point out that the standard calculations specified by the <br /> methodologies outlined above apply to an incinerator sited on land which is <br /> essentially flat, and which does not have significant obstructions to <br /> reasonably smooth air flows across the site. In the Public Inquiry into the <br /> proposed Whiddon Down BSE Incinerator (Applicant Mr R Toms; April 1992) , it <br /> was held that relevant topographic features of the site should be taken into <br /> account in the calculation of the chimney height. <br /> The possibility that the siting of the crematorium may be such that <br /> downdraughts may develop behind the building(s) near the chimney therefore <br /> needs to be taken into account. It is generally agreed that the air flowing <br /> over a building is disturbed up to a height of 1.5 times above the height of <br /> the building. Moreover, disturbance of the air flow may extend to a distance <br /> of up to five times the height of the obstruction downwind of it (see note <br /> at the head of this section, above) . <br /> The presence of large trees on the upwind side of the site indicates that <br /> they are liable to cause disturbance of the air flow across the site for a <br /> very substantial distance downwind, and may therefore interfere with the <br /> idealised smooth air flow over the proposed buildings. The complex <br /> calculations required to determine the eventual dimensions of the chimney of <br /> the proposed facility appear not to have been provided in the Planning <br /> Application, and should be regarded as a significant and important defect in <br /> the application. This factor is discussed in the following sections. <br /> Any claim that the emission temperature of the Crematorium effluent will be <br /> so high that it would 'punch its way' up into the atmosphere should be <br /> viewed with considerable scepticism. Any observation of even the large <br /> municipal incinerator at Marsh Barton, Exeter, will show that such an <br /> idealised situation only occurs during periods of almost total calm-n o t a <br /> situation which is common on the verges of Dartmoor. For all normal <br /> operating purposes, it will be the horizontal mixing pattern that will <br /> determine the dispersion of the effluent plume = as I shall attempt to <br /> establish below, the topographical characteristics of this specific site <br /> suggest that there will be substantial interference with the idealised <br /> theoretical pattern of plume dispersal, which will be very different to the <br /> gentle upward dispersal pattern envisaged by the Proponents of the <br /> Application. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.