Laserfiche WebLink
Emission Test Report <br /> EMC WA-2-08 <br /> Section 3 <br /> Revision: 0 <br /> Date: September 30, 1939 <br /> Page 6 of 33 <br /> that Run 1 inlet results are low by a factor of 10 compared to Runs 2 and 3. As is <br /> commonly observed, data show a trend for increased dioxinflum amounts at the outlet <br /> compared with the inlet. There is also a trend for increased dioxinlfurm amounts as SCC <br /> temperatures are increased. <br /> 3.4.5 Results of 0„ CO„ SO„ NO„ and CO Analysis and Opacity <br /> Observations <br /> Continuous instrumental analyzers were used for the duration of a cremation to ,:}s <br /> measure scrubber inlet and outlet emissions of 0„ CO„ SO„ NO„ and CO. A concurrent <br /> visible emissions evaluation for opacity was also performed at the chimney outlet. Results . <br /> of continuous instrumental analyzers monitoring and opacity observations are presented in <br /> Table 3-25. <br /> The Run 5 cremation in Unit 4 started 30 minutes before the end of a cremation in r; <br /> Unit 1. For the first 30 minutes of Run 5, therefore, visible emissions recorded may not <br /> reflect the true visible emissions from Unit 4 only. °f <br /> The SO„ NO„ and CO instrumental analyzers occasionally recorded gas concentration <br /> spikes that exceeded their span. At the end of the test program, the linearity of the <br /> analyzers at higher concentrations was demonstrated by using a calibration gas above the <br /> highest one-minute average spike measured during the test program. Calibration gas was <br /> introduced at the sampling probe, and linearity was demonstrated to meet the accuracy and <br /> calibration error requirements of Methods 6C, 7E and 10 in A endix A of 40 CFR 6 D q � pp <br /> Data from the post-test linearity checks are contained in Appendix J. <br /> 3.4.6 Process Data <br /> Process test data and a summary body/container bd /container characteristics = provided in . <br /> p <br /> Tables 3-26 and 3-27 respectively. Process data collection forms are found in <br /> Appendix B. As denoted in the process data Table 3-26, no ambient odors were noticeable <br /> near the crematory. However, a slight foul odor could be observed by passersby near the <br /> down draft of the stack during the first 2 to 3 minutes. <br /> �n <br /> k <br /> MTtt-AEM4951-09-03 S3.wpd <br />