Laserfiche WebLink
..K ray..''s-"'p`'�r"-a'+`-'�".s�r�. r-'�:^r-�'�.Y .. ..�'•�"'xr��.o- .... '-fs.�►t ..syai�'.� .ca <br /> ,� r. •K <br /> ,y aF.y.ni °i!'- r :aL::r`: LL -;.....i;. ..:a:.T.:' ':x .:Y;:•'�:i.�: .fir <br /> n S:'_ �• f' 'i.. -. ''� :lI'i ..3 Y= ..-.-._.r.'•:'-.. Fr,•.' .. .� 1. ..E.Y"..� . <br /> �Sdon' est <br /> EMC WA 2-08 <br /> NO <br /> Section 4 <br /> Revision: 0 <br /> Date:September 30, 1999 <br /> Page 9 of 9 <br /> The impinger contents recovered from the Method 26A trains were analyzed by ion <br /> chromatography (IQ using the procedures specified in Method 26A. The contents of the <br /> first three impingers were combined and analyzed for chloride to determine HCi emissions. <br /> Analysis of the fourth through sixth impingers (caustic solution) was not within the scope <br /> of work for this project. No modifications of these procedures were required. <br /> 4.3 Process Data <br /> Process operating parameters necessary to characterize process conditions were <br /> k , monitored and recorded during each test run. Data were recorded manually about every <br /> 15 min to provide a record depicting process operations. Parameters logged were <br /> secondary chamber temperatures, body container description and weight, body weight <br /> q (gross weight less container tare weight), batch cycle time, any noticeable changes or <br /> t : <br /> fluctuations during each cycle, and fuel flow (consumption) rate. Additionally, presence or <br /> lack of any ambient odors, outdoor ambient temperature and relative humidity were noted <br /> and documented during each run. <br /> k. <br /> 3 <br /> Fr; <br /> i <br /> e' <br />