My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2001_0813_packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2001
>
2001_0813_packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/3/2011 11:55:31 AM
Creation date
10/3/2011 11:40:49 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
292
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION <br /> Date: 08/13/01 <br /> Item No: Cā3 <br /> e ar n pproval.. Manager A roved: Agenda Section: <br /> CONSENT <br /> Item Description: City initiated request for a 60-day plan review extension regarding the request by Bauer <br /> Domes Variance from Section 1004.02D5 of the Roseville City Code for property <br /> located at 691 Heinel Drive (PF3327). <br /> 1.0 REQUESTED ACTION <br /> 11 The Community Development Department is seeking an extension to the 60-day plan review time <br /> line to discuss development options with Bauer Domes for the property located at 691 Heniel Drive. <br /> 2.0 BACKGROUND <br /> 2.1 On July 11,200 1, the Roseville Planning Commission continued the Bauer Dome request for a <br /> variance to their August 8 meeting. The Commission directed the applicant to design a site plan that <br /> included a proposed home on the parcel allowing the Commission to consider the request for <br /> variance based on a specific proposal. <br /> 2.2 During the week of July 23 ā 27, the Community Development Staff received a telephone call from <br /> Steve Zawadski of W. F. Bauer Domes to discuss the requested information for the August 8 <br /> Planning Commission meeting. Mr. Zawadski indicated that he would be on vacation and unable to <br /> provide the necessary information to the Commission for their consideration. He asked to have the <br /> request continued to the Commission meeting of September 12th. <br /> 2.3 The Community Development Staff suggested that Mr. Zawadski provide the City with a letter <br /> explaining the circumstances and request a review extension. However, a letter was never received. <br /> Fence, given the current time line, staff will seek the extension. <br /> 3.0 STAFF RECOMMENDATION <br /> 3.1 In order to properly provide the Planning Commission with the information they requested, and to act <br /> properly on the requested variance, the Community Development Department is requesting a 60-day <br /> plan review extension. The extension will allow the land use application to be processed in <br /> September 2001, without concern over state mandated review deadlines. <br /> 4.0 SUGGESTED COUNCIL ACTION <br /> 4.1 Adopt a resolution to approve a 60-day extension to the plan review deadline for the request by <br /> Bauer Domes (PF3327) from August 10, 2001 to October 9, 2001. <br /> Prepared by: Thomas Paschke <br /> Attachments:Resolution. 60-Day Schedule:Application accepted on June 12,2001,Decision deadline is August 11,2001. <br /> Extension to October 9,2001 <br /> PF3329 RCA (081301) -Page 1 of 1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.