1998_0824_packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

the property is 1,800 square feet; therefore, the maximum 2. The required rear yard of p � area is 450 square feet (25% of the required rear allowed for a detached garage . ' detached 1 5' 22' square foot garage is 30 square feet i n area yard. The existing Beta � a , required rear and and the proposed replacement garage '1�.3�� of the regal yard) is 676 square feet in area (37,6% of the required rear yard). i Code, states that an accessory building cannot occupy �. section ��4.g�(A), City of the require d rear and (width more than � of lot x 30, required rear yard depth). section 704.04(8) requires a minimum driveway setback of 5' from the side lot line. outlines the procedure for considering a variance. Section 1013.02 p 3.0 STAFF CO T grin this request, staff made the following findings: .� In reviewing q Section 1004-01( ) of the i Code limits the size of an accessory building City to 5a of th e required rear yard, which limits the size of a detached garage � q � on this property to 450 square feet. The proposed garage will be 676 square feet in area (37.6% of the required rear yard). non conforming width of the panel creates a physical . The pre-existing, � applicant; it limits the size of an accessory building to 450 hardship for the app . square feet. (A standard, ]� dard newt created lot would be 85 feet in width and allow for approximately square atel 635 feet of accessory buildings.) The substandard width h of the parcel also creates a practical difficulty in locating a driveway to access a detached garage. 3. The proposed variance is in harmony with the general purpose and intent of • Comprehensive Plan and Title 10 of the city code (Zoning). The the City's comp rehen use on the parcel and the interior design of the house location of the Ono p prohibits the construction of an attached garage of any size. The proposed replacement garage will be setback the required five feet from the western property line (existing garage is set back 3 feet). g 4. The proposed variance: if ranted will not adversely affect the public health, safety, or general welfare. NAPE RECOMmENDATI • section .1 w staff recommends approval of the �1 based on the findings outlined 4' to 37.5% of the required rear for e nest for a variance to increase the lot coverage request P F3057 - RCA(08124198) Page 2 of 3