Laserfiche WebLink
Q Ar Inc, 861-2026 8/13/98 1:S 2 AM S/6 <br /> Nationale <br /> Any time a home is '"reconstructed", there is a loss of value that occurs while <br /> - -� - its <br /> portions of an existing saleable home are dismantled in preparation for <br /> improvement. Because of this, the home as collateral to a bank, actually diminishes <br /> l' � <br /> o� , some ��1 ti �e in value dur in construction before it improves. In ad dit. <br /> dismantled structure has a value that must necessarily be discarded before an <br /> improvement that rn ake s the home more marketable can occur. <br /> Marti cuilarly in an expensive construction market like the present One, it may not be <br /> ossibl e for the homeowner to feel confident of are immediate increase in the home <br /> value equal to his or her initial home value plus the cost of improvements. Over <br /> the years, however, the home will appreciate more rapidly than it would have, had <br /> it been allowed to become more and more market obsolete. From QSA's experience, <br /> a reconstructed home in a community Sritli a program in place to encourage malty <br /> reconstructed hordes, does reach a value that recovers its investment, but this is a <br /> fact learned from the experience of other commuu-iities, and not one readily <br /> apparent at first to the risk tapers, the homeo-sinners and the barks. <br /> For these reasons{ public city involvement in nuking a home reconstruction more <br /> attractive and competitive with the cost of simply selling the hone, abandoiung the <br /> community and moving to an outlying exurb (with the homes that already have <br /> desired amenities), is critical for cities in the first ring. <br /> This p rogram is designed also to provide reasonable security and return for the city. <br /> Roseville has the opportunity to reserve approval of a project Luitil it is well enOUgh <br /> planned armed to permit financing by traditional commercial leaders. It draws potential <br /> participants ants from a broad field and permits the city to stay less involved in particular <br /> attempts until they appear likely to succeed. <br /> This p rogr am requires city capital at first, but an analysis of return on i n vestni ent <br /> shows that the city will recover its investments in tax revenues and loan <br /> repayments even if even participant stays in the home long enough to have half the loan forgiven.* It has the additional advantage of encouraging residents to stay <br /> in Roseville and develop their commitments here. <br /> If the economy slows and Roseville homes fail to appreciate 4% annually*, and/or <br /> the economic value of well-designed homes becomes more obvious, the loans can <br /> be made to return more revenue by requiring a mcxle st interest rate or greater <br /> y <br /> a <br /> re p ment. This could further enhance the city`s ability to expand the program. <br />