res_7763 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

EXTRACT OF MINUTES OF MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE * * * * * * * * * * * * Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Roseville, County of Ramsey, Minnesota was duly held in the City Hall at 2660 Civic Center Drive, Roseville, Minnesota on the 8th day of July, 1985 at 7:30 o'clock p.m. The following members were present: Demos and the following were absent: Franke, Curley, Kehr, Johnson and None. Member Kehr introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION 7763 RESOLUTION REQUESTING THE METROPOLITAN COUNCIL HRA TO APPLY FOR AND IMPLEMENT A REHABILITATION LOAN PROGRAM WITH THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE WHEREAS, the City of Roseville desires to assist low income homeowners in making repairs to their homes for the purpose of correcting defects affecting directly the safety, habitability, energy conservation, or accessibility of the property; and, WHEREAS, the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency has funds to be used for such purposes, and will accept applications from housing and redevelopment authorities desiring to administer these Rehabilitation Loan Program funds; and, WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Council has been duly organized pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 1976, Section 473.123 and has all of the powers and duties of a housing and redevelopment authority pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 1976, 473.193 under the provisions of the Municipal Housing and Redevelopment Act, Minnesota Statutes 1976, Sections 462.411 to 462.711: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Metropolitan Council is hereby requested to include the City of Roseville in an application for state Rehabilitation Loan Program funds, and that the City Manager, James F. Andre is hereby authorized to enter into any necessary agreement with the Metropolitan Council for operating the Program within the city. The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Franke and upon a vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Franke, Curley, Kehr, Johnson and Demos and the following voted against the same: None.