1998_0727packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Check ire �ith liaison �.�rou Hold second meeting v,-ith i�ai�O H �r�_�{ used nontiscai irnpacts stuiv areas and dic aI-)sated torc�:a, , categories, case stud' communities. prop time for outside input. prier to having the consultant LIO Out into t i field Ith This �s an important ti p assumptions in place. Field work: ' ws and re are "level of service" paper. Consultant conducts cry-depth Conduct community i nzery ie of stud communities, gathering data on costs re��enue sources and interviews with municipal staff� � � are affected h�� development. cruises provided. The data will include all funded activities that p level of s R costs as well as operating and maintenance expenses and revenues. The data will also include capital well—infrastructure maintenance not data-gathering will collect information on other factors as ire l 1 This � � ' central cities for example.. The communities mun i ties are not being asked to calculate being undertaken in the cen � F . . future demands—the ` act model vwi ll do this. Case study communities will be asked to con demands—the i m p that the level of service paper describes reasonable assumptions about the cost and revenue system a n d that the data are accurate. Conduct rtonfisca l impact analysis. Council staff will design and conduct nonfiscal impact studies in topic areas determined car l i er, Check in with liaison rou . Review level of service paper with the liaison group. Model Development and Analysis: Fro are fiscal impact model and fiscal im act rc ort. Based on interviews and level of service paper, the • developed and analyzed. A fiscal impact analysis will be generated for each ca-se fiscal impact model is deer g � fiscal impact report will discuss the reasons for the annualized expenditures as study community. The f g p communities b e of service and by type of land use. The revenues will well as revenues to the co Y R uses and capital costs. include all revenue sources, and the costs will znc lode both operating exile Therefore the comm unity will understand the magnitude o f any net casts that exist for the d i f'e re t I a n d uses under the two alternatives. Expected Results: • al sis for each sample community and both sample school districts. • Fiscal impact an Fiscal impact analysis of land use prototypes for application on a broader scale. • Application and analysis of impacts and prototypes to region as a whole. Analysis of infrastructure replacement needs in mature communities, Analysis of nonftscal 'Unpacts of growth, impact of growth development patterns ott sustainable development. Review of p � How the Metropolitan Council will Use the Results: F used(1)to assist local governments in analyzing impacts of local land use The results of the study will be u decisions, (2)to seek -effective eek appropriate legislative tools to encourage better planned, cost g deve l-ogmcnt• and(3)to i nforin the Council as it works with local governments on development actions� The "nd distribute the results of the study through the media,the Council's Data The ounce t will publ fish a . e. The results will also be communicated to local governments through Center and the Council's web Pap . . when working- with � Sector Representative program. In addition, staff will use the information g. the Council's p with local g ovemments in reviewing_their comprehensive plans.