My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
1998_0727packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1998
>
1998_0727packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/6/2011 11:45:19 AM
Creation date
10/6/2011 11:27:23 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
171
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
TASK <br /> alciLtlate Prototvpe Fiscal frnpact ResUIL-i <br /> The previous t1��al iI"llp��� �- rk �.vi ±�a*� � � �t 1.. <br /> ,� t ne relc�'ant iand -use a ti V'ti'S. 1� retZec� � ���� ca�� �tr�dr�'- <br /> conb ucnca t development fo_ a1] �_ t _ F r ,�.y��� +r�� ih e costs for u to <br /> final approach. it Wi use she � ,, 1` fiat= <br /> r pp ,, � <br /> -�, hot ratat L)aq�S. AS an earn]] I� Cale case ������-rnarg�na� <br /> right land use categories on a snaps � _ <br /> +� and the <br /> t approach reflected an increase in park capital costs avcr the foreca�t pc�od of ��� <br /> C05 <br /> -� will be 0 for the arks and <br /> ' it. population b .� � persons. t�;,o per "apita cos <br /> t t <br /> community increased � p , _ � etwo�ala�� -,11 be utilized far aii revenues. <br /> recreab on capital costs. n appropsare calcul at.On n i � <br /> �n���. `I'h� rn�t.�adalo ' ����i1 h� <br /> different ;n most cases <br /> ��-�� the if <br /> oap�tai ���� � op�rat�ng ��p - <br /> a � �f 'ch the curretx� r��reat�ar� budget would be divided b�� current <br /> capita-averdLYC cost appro b in <br /> popular i on to equal the cos! per capita- <br /> k t �� � rl' ru }' 1 his report <br /> %V,e wit l prepare the l~iscaI report on up to eight land u zc ��v ,: r each <br /> capi <br /> d nr%cuss the full cost allocation for c ac h p � -- <br /> . r- v if 1 rea r -ed on a per unit bass far resid ntial and <br /> nses and rc enues by land tom-) an option tion o <br /> t �. jV111 Coi i�f d c <br /> square, foot basi3 for nonresidential. � . : pp en x f t;7 <br /> ' � and casr al,d <br /> r a utilized a� rit aIt:d� r"0 Cis re tO z - � f r 1 a <br /> cost and rcvenue sUMptiorI <br /> revenue factig memor durn- <br /> hoof distria. we Will Lifflize Lhe approp naic res', �i������I one, <br /> For each hn�IT�� : 'i4' ~�: � 'rct. .'1fr il�tc��if ;�. 0 � 1r1 �:, <br /> 'e �►r111 pi e pars a drab report t or e�,�_ <br /> made we, %'sll prcpars: a final rc� ��. <br /> r urr., Land Urve Pro WA,pe FE SC aI R&.,07-u"s Ref o r: <br /> TASK 9 Assist kn Regionai Fiscal Impact Analvsls Activities <br /> the cetur-rnar�itt colt vial it-npdct findings tothr <br /> We will v�ork with the council staff to aPPJY � - , bers <br /> f the co uninest school Istrict-s to the Metro Council me <br /> w�tl the laid u se pirotat� far cap - t s cn ar0 s. This i <br /> - t��n� �f t��_���era�� t��c�I r iri�act ��tirrtatc�� of �o !� <br /> in order to provide a proxy in <br /> - hierarchy of land uses�_y type. We ��it� provide a technical review <br /> likely to rnalud aiutn the ray-fide a crtti uf <br /> - olic • ire lication'S at. the findings and rill p <br /> of the Council staff paper discusstn, p P <br /> the recommend do ns. <br /> Work Product: Memoranda as APPrOPrIcle- <br /> In Review, of Ikon-fiscal Impacts of Growth <br /> nrr r,rin of the �nunc it itatt non-ri val impact tudsc <br /> Wc arc prc parcel to providc our cxperti.sc in ti _ which o Lhe r <br /> in various to pic <br /> _ and 1 C have x o kec on 13ev oral assign�en.s in <br /> perii� e *ill he benef <br /> :on;rderations besides fiscal results considered 1.� tr kai ire rho <br /> Tf & `' <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.