Laserfiche WebLink
- JUL 22 '98 02=42PM PET,11 $ELL,CCNV,JENSE P.3/4 <br /> 2. • ited hnsineSs, in the cer�prehen8ivc plan and <br /> The site �� designated a� ��, �� <br /> • related commercial, residential or mimed use 1�� the <br /> designated for riei��iber�oc�l rel <br /> � <br /> recently adopted Comprehensive Plan amendments which were based on a study� � <br /> of the entire neighborhood. <br /> 3. . - es� ��� �� retail �n�ine�,� based on historical <br /> The site is ZOned B I, ltrnited btl�in - <br /> �1nd11� zoning x� re�identiati ��' limited business. <br /> ���� �� the ppe - uric � n <br /> Surrounding uses are <br /> limited business, commercial recreation, public recreano <br /> and residential. <br /> 4. The adopted WMPTeh ensive plan and amendments provide guidelines to ensure <br /> � ��1� area <br /> orderly and stag development and redevc1opment o <br /> the planted, Ord ared b e <br /> e plan rcccrnmei�daticns for the entire area prep � <br /> consistent with th <br /> Jarrow Addition 'Task Force. <br /> - ' 't l� incer��istent with the zoillng and plan in <br /> �. ��� proposed conditional L15� permit^ � � �� <br /> service f acillt is a permitted or conditional use in any <br /> t#iat a� i"c�rrn ��' auto �e �' application is <br /> ' parallel r�I ng district. Therefore, the pp <br /> planning district and p <br /> inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan. <br /> 6. - residential �r mixed use designation emphasizes <br /> The limited business, resid _ <br /> conpatibili with the nei hborncod. A B-2 retail use attracts activities <br /> t1�5 <br /> incompatible with the neighborhood interest. <br /> 7. � sized uses in a retail versus a linllted bL�SIIXess <br /> Traffic generated f�Fn comparably <br /> exposing the nci, hborhol to unnecessary <br /> district are two to three times greater . <br /> . . - incompatible with local circulation and traffic oblectives. <br /> additional outside traffic iri�,�tnp <br /> ces and se arates the parcel from adjacent <br /> The proposed site plan screens, fen p <br /> �. p p � �uildm �n the neighborhoods arse+ } <br /> parcels and the public park. father - � • . <br /> � e1 �1b '��1ood negatively impacting ��fl the <br /> it seeks t� separate itself from then � <br /> propel values of the area. <br /> • ation/access facility negatively affects the <br /> '� r auto Iry ice instal l , _ <br /> 9. proposed he area un acting property values by failing <br /> public health, �afet� and welfare of t � P <br /> p adding n traffic beyond that anticipated by <br /> t integrate with the community, - ili <br /> . � safer problems related tc� its incompatib <br /> neighborhood hho rhood related uses, creating P and <br /> g safer of residen�s and children by separating <br /> and endangering the health and y <br /> f encing the st Le <br /> from the adjacent community park. <br />