My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
1998_0713_packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1998
>
1998_0713_packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/6/2011 1:03:36 PM
Creation date
10/6/2011 12:49:58 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
128
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
-� , <br /> IS: 16 <br /> ir.S4 <br /> 3. Refunds.-perhaps this section cowed, but the refunds did not go to the <br /> o omission,mods were requ ed to each subscriber in the area due to the ineonwt <br /> rate which the Conunissi on asserted the company was charging. The withheld fimds <br /> from the refund vie for the improvement of the school's snufios and did not accrue <br /> to the benefit of the Commission. <br /> 4. Franchise fee recoupment__forhid the company from passing the expense of the <br /> settlement onto the subscribers. <br /> 5. Universal Service-_required the company to provide free service and tallation of <br /> the part of their service which carved the community chefs. I should add that this <br /> was fairly revolutionary in the entire country,and over 400 households locally have <br /> takcn advantage of this. <br /> 6. G-rantsmeThis section required the company to continue with the community <br /> pro— and egwpment grants which they agreed to in the ong franchise <br /> even through renewal, This was agamn unique from around the country and took a <br /> major s=bljng block of renewal off thr. table. It did not amend any of Cities" <br /> �chises in it did gust the opposite and preserved them for the=cwal tom. <br /> Ile City arrays has the option in renewal to give it all back to the company. No <br /> City authority was preempted by the Conunission. <br /> 7. Profits of sale--required that in light of the anticipated sale of the system, if the <br /> value of the.system was enhanced by the MOU seftlement of the rate dispute, the <br /> company would have to pass that•beam t onto the subscribe as a rate reed* <br /> p y <br /> 8. Equipment replacement--required upon sale a$1 00,E payment to the Commission <br /> for comm urdty pro ` equipment_ This was not a benefit to the Commission%W1 Ing <br /> and not the City. Roseville 'gowned" its proportional sha= of the grant and the <br /> resulting equipment, and the equipment such as the mobile van are used for a <br /> signifit-amount of Roseville propmmming, from parades, central park and the <br /> speed slog oval. <br /> - . ervicc rates--eludes-agent on the rate dispute amounts and the PEG fee <br /> seMement. <br /> 1 o.1 . pretty,rnuch boiler-plate previsions. <br /> I hope this helped explain the mter& e bctwem the MOLT, the fOnchise, and the Joint Powers <br /> Apvemmt- If any other quesdons are raised, or if 1 have not adequately answered your questions, <br /> p <br /> law do not hesitate to contact me. We all work ultimately for the Member Cities. <br /> 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.