Laserfiche WebLink
■ ■ . a 9 1=1 Q 119.1 1 k 9 t ho 8 R U OFIER ab A F G-if le-)do WA t%0.A 0 -he%Eo'I Iwo'%Qf S. Is <br /> %..IN I is% I E%am I oftw4mor %JEN I I r <br /> ■ ■ ■ + <br /> ■ <br /> ■ <br /> ■ a r .0 01%0 %rPRINFINIF <br /> Uaka aq Avenue frentane- a n <br /> i <br /> ■ ■ ■ ■ a r--lizer:,Ht thr.,1 tmffir, nmd 'A Re h.1.30F130GE1 <br /> Aummila ■ <br /> W. <br /> +7 %Aor R%S.i al ONO F 1 4 Feasenable- h8ffles <br /> ■ ■ ■ ■ a . ■ad Censweler. q!ceasenalale far. rnpA Rt frantaign to him- 1 1pu&A f^ na-Innata-d R=Ong'lew <br /> 1 in ■ <br /> ■ <br /> pnQuada- ■ ■ ■ ■ <br /> ■ 4 <br /> laugr ■ <br /> 111NOFIFIVINVII-Iff Vdftfflftff <br /> I ismitHES,Gem eemme.R.:1.6 aca magala'a landar.tha 121 10 mmannal ■ <br /> FOR FAIRVIEW AVENUE AND ADJACENT 14 HOME <br /> Recommend coordinating County plans for future Fairview Avenge improvements with <br /> the neighborhood desire for improved and safer traffic access and for fair treatment of <br /> the adjacent homeowners who would be heavily impacted. <br /> If Fairview Avenue is aver widened on the east side, the homes must be removed and <br /> the owners fairly reimbursed. The following interim recommendations are based upon <br /> information and review to date. Further evaluation is recommended. <br /> The vehicle speed on Fairview between "B-2" and "C" should be slowed to reduce <br /> mMmmrw.x <br /> rear end accidents. Signage and a slower speed zone are recommended. <br /> Add a 5th center turn lane which will widen Fairview about 10 feet. <br /> Add a neighborhoods connection to a stoplight on Fairview near Oakcrest West. <br /> Review future (2 to 6+ year) Mans with neighborhood/Fairview homeowners. <br /> Purchase a li homes adjacent to Fairview because heavy impacts are expected <br /> Redevelop the adjacent property into buffer with some housing if possible. <br /> a. county staff would first recommend widening Fairview to add a center turn lane <br /> for less interruption of traffic flow and safer access. A county improvement <br /> project has not been initiated but would be expected in the future with increased <br /> traffic. <br /> b. County staff do not recommend Fairview as reduced capacity/width or one-way <br /> because of: 1) too high volume already, )on a ore-way road, a parallel road <br /> running in the opposite direction would be needed. <br /> C. county staff traffic signal warrant analysis determined that current traffic <br /> "era rra rats" a stoplight with Oakcrest West which that business area would benefit <br /> from but has not yet requested. An offset signal will not work because the <br /> current gaps are too lame with existing Oakcrest east or Rose Place and these <br /> intersections would generally be negatively impacted by a stoplight at Oakcrest <br /> vest. One alternative is to add a Fairview lane for right turns from the <br /> PF## 889c- RCA(06/08/98)- Page 10 of 1 <br />