My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
1998_0526_packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1998
>
1998_0526_packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/7/2011 12:07:58 PM
Creation date
10/7/2011 11:43:17 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
249
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
/ <br /> 10, Information which must be submitted for all applications <br /> Am Application and Fee <br /> R, 8=1/2 x III' Site Plan showing property 11"nes, and location of all <br /> exi-stino and proposed Improvementsh <br /> Cm Written approval from OwnOrJ of adjacent or nearby properties <br /> affected by the variance request <br /> D, Wdftn statement from the applicant explaining why the variance Ims <br /> necessary and what hardshl"pa are present, <br /> 11. Application Process.- <br /> A. Applicaflons and accompanying documents reviewed with Minor Variance <br /> Committee. Minor Variance Committee makes recommendation to City <br /> It <br /> B. If Minor Variance Committee unanimously recommends approval of <br /> variance, application then goes to City Council for final action. <br /> C. If Minor Variance Committee does not unanimously recommend approval <br /> or recommends denial, new application must be made for a normal <br /> 12. The above statements are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. <br /> Si nature <br /> t / Q — <br /> SEENEASEEMENE <br /> Telephone <br /> Date <br /> ' - <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.