My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2002_0422_packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2002
>
2002_0422_packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/7/2011 12:33:10 PM
Creation date
10/7/2011 11:52:46 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
143
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
To: Mayor, Council and Manager <br /> From: Joel Jamnik <br /> Re: Odd/Even-Numbered Election Years <br /> Dear Neal, Mayor and Councilmembers: <br /> You directed our office to research and provide background information regarding <br /> changing the city general election from odd-numbered to even-numbered years. <br /> Roseville's City Code provides in Section 103.01 that the city general election shall be <br /> held on the first Tuesday after the first Monday in November of each odd-numbered year <br /> (A copy of the current ordinance follows at the bottom of this memo). <br /> The issue of local elections has been the focus of substantial legislative debate <br /> over the past few years. There have been frequent discussions at the State Capitol <br /> regarding when local elections should be held, focusing on the benefits and drawbacks of <br /> both spring or fall elections and odd or even-numbered year elections. Much of that <br /> debate centered on school board elections and school referenda, which in the past were <br /> usually held in the spring, rather than November. Because several charter cities also had <br /> springtime elections, cities became part of this broader debate regarding spring or fall <br /> elections. <br /> The legislature in 1994 acted to eliminate non-November elections in these <br /> charter cities and in school districts, and adopted a general rule that elections in cities and <br /> school districts would be held in the even-numbered year. However, there was a strong <br /> desire on the part of several legislators to establish a uniform municipal election day in <br /> the odd-numbered years for cities, schools, and counties, for reasons I expect will be <br /> identified and evaluated by the odd-even task force currently studying this issue. <br /> The effort to establish a uniform local government election day in the odd- <br /> numbered year did not last and the current version of the statute, adopted in 1995, <br /> contains a default or preference for even year elections, but authorizes a city to "hold <br /> elections in either the even-numbered year or the odd-numbered year, but not both." <br /> Unfortunately, as is often the case when an issue is contentious and the legislature has <br /> difficulty reaching a decision, or sticking with a decision once one is made, the drafting <br /> of the statute is imperfect and somewhat confusing, particularly regarding the timing and <br /> transition provisions. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.