My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
1998_0427_packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1998
>
1998_0427_packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/7/2011 1:54:03 PM
Creation date
10/7/2011 1:24:17 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
256
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Roseville Area chool Grace Church Standards and there <br /> �. Reconstruct #� ���� <br /> vacate the rfght-of-gray. The City would reconstruct the roadway to a standard <br /> determined b the school District and Church,which may result in some cost <br /> deterrn y <br /> savings ov er the first option. The cost of reconstruction would be assessed <br /> 100% to the school District and the Church. Upon completion of the <br /> reconstruction project,ect, the roadway would be vacated, leaving the school <br /> District and Church responsible for future maintenance. <br /> 3. Do not <br /> reconstruct or vacate the right-of-way. The roadway would be left in <br /> its current condition,with the City continuing maintenance and snow plowing <br /> efforts. <br /> 4. Vacate the Roadway. The City would leave the roadway as is and vacate the <br /> ri g ht-of-wa y. The east half of the vacated right-of-way would be returned to <br /> Roseville <br /> Area schools and the west half would be returned to Grace Church. <br /> it easement would be retained over the west X40 feet of the right-of-way <br /> Auto <br /> in order to accommodate existing utilities. <br /> • requested direction from the School District and Church <br /> At the meeting,� staff also req u <br /> regarding which option they prefer. <br /> 2.4 Because this roadway segment functions as a private drive, it may be in the City's <br /> • <br /> segment of the Del lwood Street ng tit-of- a . This is the <br /> hest interest t�vacate this <br /> option that was recommended by the City's Engineering staff. <br /> 2.5 ection 10 13.04 outlines the p <br /> roeedure for vacating streets, alleys-, and easements. <br /> STAFF COAO"ET <br /> 3.1 In reviewing this request, staff has made the following findings: <br /> Street was opened. This portion of Delly� in 1951. When the Hamline <br /> nod p <br /> Avenue interchange was i <br /> constructed n early 1970s, this segment of <br /> roadway became a dead end. <br /> 2. n ions as a driveway for the High School and <br /> This serpent of roadway functions public using this roadway are routinely stopped <br /> the Church. Members�f the p � <br /> at the School District's guard shack. <br /> ion of this portion of Dellwood Street will not have an <br /> �. The proposed vacation � <br /> n the general public health, safety and welfare. <br /> adverse impact � � p <br /> End � <br /> ineerin comments include the following, <br /> ' hearin staff has rne# with the School District to <br /> �. after the Planning cmr�r��ss��n �� . • <br /> ' School District�s n �rned about the potential <br /> discuss the proposed vacation. The , . . <br /> � positive solution to the <br /> access t� the School at Dell�wocd Street. � e agree that a p <br /> issue would accomplish the following: <br /> FF# 997- RRA(04/27!98) - Page 2 of 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.