Laserfiche WebLink
PLAMNLALG COMMISSION HE <br /> fflNE"D <br /> � <br /> 5.1 At the hearing held on April 8, 1998, the Commission heard from John Thein <br /> School District. He urged ed the Commission to rebuild the street, net <br /> representing the � <br /> vacate it. See below: <br /> from draft minutes of Planning Commission meeting) <br /> (Excerpt he Deliwood vacation <br /> Chair Harms opened the hearing and request Jay Kennedy summarize t <br /> report dated April 4, 1998. <br /> Jay Kennedy escribed the Dellwood street vacation and the purposes for the street(access, <br /> � � � tion while retaining drainage and utility <br /> connection), and mcommended approval of vacs <br /> easements within the right-of-ray. <br /> Member Olson asked for details regarding ownership of church parcels. Member Mulder <br /> commented that the church could sell the adjoining houses-would there be frontage. <br /> Chair Harms asked for clarification of why the vacation was supported by the owners. .lay <br /> Kennedy state the cost($85,000)was the major impediment. <br /> John The in Deputy school Superintendent, Roseville Area School District 622, asked what rights to challenge the vacation. Is theme a required number of meetings that the City must <br /> he roe owners. Jay Kennedy noted that school and church representatives <br /> hold v+nth t property p <br /> were <br /> invited to respond in November; 1997. The street is also us ed by <br /> the community-has <br /> the fire and police departments been asked to comment on the vacation. is there City coat if <br /> the road is improved and assessed? <br /> Chair Harms asked if the school district would accept an assessment?(Yes). <br /> p <br /> Chair Harms asked what will happen if the street is not there* John Thein suggested adding <br /> now curb cuts and y <br /> nd roadwa s. The school district would like to keep the street and exit. <br /> Member Olson <br /> asked N Grace sold the lots,would the City take hack the right-of-way (no). <br /> However r the lots would have 33 feet of right-of-way to he used as a driveway. <br /> Member Mulder asked for clari ication regarding staff procedure to vacate a street. play <br /> Kenned y stated no direction or ingest was received from either party. <br /> Member Rh odly noted that there are hesitant agencies and city departments. <br /> J ' <br /> John Thein noted vacation would have a health, safety and welfare impact, Deltwood Is a <br /> public street for many events ride school and church. The school district swishes to have <br /> the street rebnlit, <br /> not vacated. The district asks that the Planning Commission table this <br /> issue. <br /> Hanna moved Member Wilke seconded,to recommend denial of the request <br /> Motion:to Member � <br /> vacate a portion of Dellvwood Street(PF 97).Roll call:Ayes: Harms,Wilke,Cunningham, <br /> Klausings Olson, Mulder, Rhody. Nays: None.NW!on carried;7-0 <br /> nded denial of the request for vacation of a portion of the <br /> The orr"�I'T11sl�n cor�rrre d <br /> • Ilwood street from the southerly edge of the County Roe <br /> n�ht-�f-�►�y �n��rn as � <br /> - - approximately 600 feet south to the northerly edge of the Highway <br /> � right-of-way e��ro y <br /> dg ht-of-way (between the Roseville Area High School property and the Grace <br /> P 1=#2997-RP CA(04/27/98)- Page 4 of 4 <br />