My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
1998_0427_packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1998
>
1998_0427_packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/7/2011 1:54:03 PM
Creation date
10/7/2011 1:24:17 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
256
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
3a TAFF C T <br /> .1 in reviewing this request, staff made the following findings: <br /> Section 703.04(B)(9) of the City Code requires a side yard setback of 5 feet <br /> for a driveway on an interior lot in an R-1 zoning district. The existing <br /> driveway is setback 10 feet or more from the north side property line. While <br /> some space is available here, the drive does have rows of retaining wall <br /> blocks on both sides which would need to be moved to expand the driveway <br /> to the north around the tree. <br /> 2. The topography of the parcel does limit options for relocating the driveway <br /> to the south side of the parcel without moving the driveway retaining wall and <br /> the entry steps. <br /> 3. The location of a mature coniferous tree on the north side of the driveway <br /> creates a practical difficulty for the applicant. <br /> 4. Similar cases have been reviewed in the past by the City Council, most <br /> notably on South Mc arron's Boulevard. No variances have been issued. <br /> However wa ri ht-of- shifts were possible to solve a portion of the problem. <br /> 5. right-of-way <br /> The proposed use of right-of-way for private parking is not in harmony with <br /> the general purpose and intent of the City's Comprehensive Plan and Title <br /> 10 of the City Code (Zoning). <br /> 6. As discussed in the past cases, the proposed variance allowing vehicles to <br /> ark on the boulevard, and, if granted, could adversely affect the public <br /> health safety, or general welfare (especially drivers view of adjoining, but <br /> visuall y screened driveways, and snow plowing �. <br /> 4:0 STAFF RE o IRE DA Tfo <br /> on the findings outline in Section .'1 staff recommends denial of the request <br /> �.1 based � <br /> for a variance to allow private parking on the public right-of-way at 2474 Churchill <br /> street N. <br /> &0 S GES ACTION <br /> 5.1 By tion deny the request for a private parking space on-the-boulevard variance <br /> at 2474 Churchill street based on the findings outlined 'in section 3.1 of this report, <br /> and direct engineering the en ineerin staff to meet with the owners and suggest alternatives. <br /> • notification map; notice of public head ng; survey of property; proposed site plan; <br /> Attaot�rrrent�. loon map; p <br /> floor plan, proposed building elevation; project narrative from applicant;and photograph of property. <br /> Lion accepted as complete on April �, <br /> p p P � �� a l�ca p <br /> 6o-day Time Limit: application submitted on ApdI o, 199 pp p <br /> 1 998' decision deadline is June 20, 1998. Prepared by: Dennis Welsch (490-2232) MArpca\pf3016.rca <br /> P P#30 1 6- RCA(04/27198) - Page 2 of 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.