My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2002_0520_packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2002
>
2002_0520_packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/7/2011 1:51:30 PM
Creation date
10/7/2011 1:48:44 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
87
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Date: 05/20/02 <br /> Item: WS II. A. <br /> Roseville Ethics Task Force Report <br /> April 23, 2002 <br /> Background <br /> Upon recommendation by Roseville Mayor John Kysylyczyn and <br /> subsequently by a February 4, 2002 motion of the Roseville City Council, <br /> the Ethics Task Force was created to undertake an independent review of <br /> the Ethics Commission Resolution. Its review would include an <br /> examination of the Commission's history, its goals and procedures, and <br /> result in recommendations regarding its operations. <br /> The Ethics Task Force met on March 12, April 2, and April 23, of 2002. <br /> All five members of the Task Force were present at each meeting: Chair <br /> David Schultz, Ann Berry, Craig Klausing, Connie Pease, and Deon <br /> Stuthman. The minutes of those meetings are attached as Exhibit A. <br /> Although receiving general public comment was not part of the Task <br /> Force's charge from the City Council, the Task Force did hear from the <br /> Mayor and from all members of the Roseville Ethics Commission, the <br /> standing ethics citizens' advisory commission. <br /> In addition, the Task Force reviewed a notebook of material dealing with <br /> public ethics and municipal ethics codes and structures. <br /> This report, its findings and recommendations are endorsed by all of the <br /> Task Force's members. <br /> Findings <br /> Based upon this input and our deliberations, the Task Force makes the <br /> following findings [references in parentheses ( ) refer to the meetings at <br /> which the topics were discussed, or describe authority for the finding]: <br /> A. Roseville has had an Ethics Commission since July 23, 1990. <br /> (Resolution 8593) <br /> B. In the first five years of its existence, that is from 1990 through <br /> 19951 the Commission received two ethics complaints: one dealt <br /> with the decision process associated with the construction of the <br /> John Rose Minnesota OVAL and was dismissed by the <br /> Commission; the second complaint dealt with a political concern <br /> and was withdrawn by the complainant. (March 12, 2002 Meeting) <br /> C. In the last year, the Ethics Commission received six ethics <br /> complaints: <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.