Laserfiche WebLink
April 6, 1998 <br /> Page <br /> communicates a message of seriousness on the part of the CitY, which may aid the pity ire the <br /> encouragement f redevelopment along the new right-of-way. <br /> The following is a non-inclusive list of benefits: <br /> y � proposed right-of-way need not �� issued <br /> permits for existing properties on� p p � <br /> �. � decision t� �e Planning �nnn�s- <br /> sub'eet to the property owner appealing . <br /> subject � a which w�11 lie �e Planning <br /> s��n1 <br /> Council. The statute establishes eriteri Commission,s1 �uncil s i issuance of such permits if an appeal s made <br /> 2. <br /> If a property owner expands a <br /> use, without securing the appropriate permits from <br /> • has been adopted, the City would not need to pay <br /> the City after the �ffielal map <br /> compensation for the non-conforming expansion. <br /> � right-of-way �a assist the City in its turn planning <br /> 3. officially mapping future right y y . <br /> F in that future right-of-way acquisition and construction <br /> � budgeting press <br /> cysts, as well as future possible condemnation costs, will be more certain with an <br /> official right-of-way designation. <br /> The following is <br /> a non-inclusive list of potential liabilities: <br /> • constitutional test in �e courts. There have <br /> � statute � never � a good n <br /> • eneral inior�s regar Ong the statute, which quests <br /> men several early attorney g p that e <br /> ' portions of the statute. These opinions indicate <br /> e constitutionality �f p just <br /> ma take away a prepe� owners s right to <br /> procedures of the state y 'is subsequently started. <br /> permit is denied or if a condemnation y <br /> compensation if a pe - �statute where <br /> 1 o of i <br /> Those attorney general dealt with a previous version p <br /> • non-conforming uses were not onmpensable under the statute. <br /> legal pre-existing nay g - • <br /> g that flaw and only moose non conforming <br /> I believe a statute new has � from <br /> without proper permits, are exempted uses created after � mapping's <br /> eempe <br /> nsation if there is a subsequent coixtemnation. <br /> ' future favorable private redevelopment of e <br /> �. By adopting o��cial map� a - ss is <br /> discouraged. I assume that if the prime <br /> existing properties � g <br /> ryes and buildings which would be <br /> con�nenee�, a detailed review of the prope <br /> • 1 red to eterm�ne vrhether the City might be <br /> affected will be �nventrie any y <br /> . redevelopment which would be beneficial to the <br /> discouraging development or rode <br /> city. <br />