My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
1998_0323_packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1998
>
1998_0323_packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/10/2011 11:44:19 AM
Creation date
10/10/2011 11:27:12 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
205
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
~ <br /> ~ <br /> � ^ <br /> Infortnat'l'on whmich must be subm'I'tted for all applications: <br /> A. Appi'licatlon and Fee I I of all <br /> 8,412 x I I" SHO Plan show"ng property 1"'nes, and location <br /> B, ed *mprovements. <br /> exist1rig and propos I arby properties <br /> C' WN'tten approval from owners of adjacent or ne <br /> affected by the vanmance request, <br /> D. Wn"tten statement from the applicant expla'I'n1ng why the variance is <br /> necessary and what hardsh'lps are present. <br /> 11. Application Processm iance <br /> A. Applications and accompanying documents reviewed with Minor Var* <br /> Commiftee. Minor Variance Committee makes recommendation to City <br /> Council. <br /> B. If Minor Variance Committee unanimously recommends approval of <br /> variance, application then goes to City Council for final action. <br /> C. if Minor Variance Committee does not unanimously rerommend approv;al <br /> or recommends denial, new application must be made for a normal <br /> variance, <br /> 12. The above statements are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. <br /> .0.7- <br /> Pignarture <br /> 8 6P <br /> WOMPEMEWWomm JY E <br /> Telep ne <br /> 9 <br /> Date <br /> 2 <br /> ..................... <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.