My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
1998_0217_packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1998
>
1998_0217_packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/10/2011 3:42:30 PM
Creation date
10/10/2011 3:30:24 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
137
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
■ <br /> Preserve the easement (W-30"?) <br /> Snelling■ <br /> Ave. <br /> storing Provide W:Idth/area. for <br /> shopping Extend the bike path from Snellingintersection to the <br /> center. <br /> Require a similar emergency road access to the shopping center and <br /> ider also marking mt for both Woke path and walkway use.i <br /> ■ <br /> could provide a triple benefit and prevent people from parking on it <br /> Consider rerouting Oakcrest south around a now contiguous residential <br /> it is seen as addiffing value, making beat use of property <br /> ■ <br /> ions■ <br /> under the high power lines and provding a larger buffer and loca <br /> for ftees to helpscreen the shopping center. <br /> ign <br /> city should make Oakcrest a citystreotif state des standards <br /> The MEMO <br /> are too restrictive, <br /> �3 �F��F M������A�D�A�D �C�EN�T �4�H �E� <br /> The Task Force knows that the "Issues on this topic are very complicated, <br /> • <br /> parties. There 'is no o bvious or <br /> likely Interrelated and sensitive to all 'Involved easy solution or significant <br /> fly resolved by <br /> planning. It "is believed this could have been more easi■ <br /> which ■ ■ <br /> earlier supporL <br /> Med an *Interim <br /> a <br /> recommendation <br /> The Task Force has provi <br /> ufter discussion, Additional evaluationis. recommended <br /> ■ We <br /> adjacent'do the best road revisions and the best future for the <br /> to help deci <br /> residential area thatis fair to all ■ <br /> ■ parties. <br /> calming Nothing has been recommended for traffic <br /> Ing the road, Itis hoped that the recommended changes at the <br /> or narrow <br /> ends mn"ll help reduce excessive spews, It received state aid fbr the last <br /> M <br /> ■ ■ <br /> ■ <br /> Improvement and■ <br /> eligibility ! <br /> possible. <br /> desire 0 F <br /> Adjacent homeowners have not expressed any large problems or <br /> complaints but have mentioned the nolso and v1sual impacts and a <br /> them,to 'Improve Conceptually adding a berm and trees could be done and <br /> silver would help. It should be discussed further* it may be difficult to agree to <br /> anything on railroad property or purchase a small <br /> i o <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.