My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2011_0919
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2011
>
CC_Minutes_2011_0919
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/11/2011 11:49:33 AM
Creation date
10/11/2011 11:49:28 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
9/19/2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday, September 19, 2011 <br /> Page 10 <br /> benefited the tax base rather than costing more in services than they <br /> brought forward. <br /> Councilmember McGehee provided a copy of information provided by <br /> Police Chief Mathwig on housing and business types and their service re- <br /> quirements. <br /> Mr. Trudgeon clarified that, while it was interesting to conjecture certain <br /> uses with city services and talk about the need for positive tax and the <br /> amount of taxes greater than their benefit; however, while not being nega- <br /> tive, the heart of the matter was that the detail that could be provided <br /> through a fiscal impact study would be more specific and accurate. <br /> Related to fiscal impact studies, Mr. Trudgeon advised that there were dif- <br /> ferences in developing a community with a lot of open spaces with devel- <br /> opment impacts greater on infrastructure and services; where if a fully de- <br /> veloped community such as Roseville, those impacts were more incremen- <br /> tal since there is already some infrastructure available and in place to pro- <br /> vide some level of service. <br /> Mr. Trudgeon advised that the rule of thumb was that often residents are <br /> found to have a greater impact on City services than commercial, with few <br /> exceptions, as they have a greater demand in consuming parks, trails and <br /> schools. <br /> While recognizing that fiscal impact studies are powerful tools, Mr. <br /> Trudgeon cautioned decision-making on that alone, and questioned if such <br /> decision-making was even legal under state statute. Mr. Trudgeon sug- <br /> gested that, if something was identified as a winner from a tax base stand- <br /> point, while also being identified as a community need and supportable in <br /> the market place, the City may wish to consider incenting that develop- <br /> ment or project as much as possible, given limited resources to do so. <br /> However, Mr. Trudgeon suggested that this is where the City's energy <br /> should be focused, and while fiscal impacts were an interesting part of any <br /> land use discussion, it should not be the sole decision-making considera- <br /> tion. <br /> Mayor Roe concurred that decisions not be made exclusively on a fiscal <br /> impact basis, and opined that there were different levels of land use and <br /> other supporting documents for that land use, such as the Comprehensive <br /> Plan. Mayor Roe opined that it would seem to be a reasonable expectation <br /> that within mixed use communities, there would be some net users and <br /> some net providers within that mix. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.