My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2011_0926
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2011
>
CC_Minutes_2011_0926
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/11/2011 12:00:49 PM
Creation date
10/11/2011 12:00:40 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
9/26/2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
62
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday, September 26, 2011 <br /> Page 11 <br /> effort to reduce costs currently being expended. Ms. Bacon noted that there were <br /> no additional funds being requested for the Wellness Program; and that this would <br /> be a net savings to the City over current expenditures. <br /> Councilmember Pust recognized that; however, she noted that it still represented <br /> an additional benefit to the employees, and while that may be great, the City <br /> Council's budget considerations and discussions needed to take into consider the <br /> broader scope, such as whether or not a neighborhood hockey rink needed to be <br /> closed due to lack of funds; and whether savings from the employee benefit pro- <br /> gram needed to be reallocated accordingly. <br /> At the request of Councilmember McGehee, Ms. Bacon advised that depending <br /> on the amount of detail being requested by the City Council for additional infor- <br /> mation and comparables, and the time-consuming nature of a detailed benefit <br /> package comparison that would determine what additional information could be <br /> available for the City Council by their October 10, 2011 meeting. <br /> Councilmember McGehee opined that the real discussion was related to an overall <br /> $100,000 savings based on staff initiatives on keeping themselves healthy; with <br /> the $18,000 saved through negotiations but retaining the same employee benefits <br /> as last year. <br /> Mayor Roe clarified that staff had negotiated a lower cost with employees for the <br /> same coverage. <br /> Ms. Bacon concurred, noting that coverage wouldn't change benefits at all; but <br /> that the extra $10.00 per month would go into the benefit package; leaving the <br /> expenditure flat for the employee health insurance package. If the City Council <br /> determined that the $18,000 should be allocated to other uses; Ms. Bacon advised <br /> that staff benefits would remain as is, with staff continuing to receive $25.00 <br /> monthly as their wellness incentive rather than the proposed $35.00. <br /> Councilmember McGehee spoke in support of the additional wellness incentive as <br /> a reward for employees working on improving their health and lifestyle choices. <br /> Councilmember Johnson requested that the additional information from staff in- <br /> clude ratios for single coverage, and family coverage in various tiers for the entire <br /> health insurance package and for comparables, not just the cafeteria portion, with <br /> the intent to determine if the City was within the ballpark with other communities <br /> in their overall employee benefit package. <br /> Ms. Bacon responded that this would not be possible within this timeframe. She <br /> also noted no other city has our exact package. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.