My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
1998_0108_packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1998
>
1998_0108_packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/11/2011 12:21:45 PM
Creation date
10/11/2011 12:14:46 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
68
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
!I <br /> coordinating 11 ADJAI <br /> 11 14T14 <br /> FO <br /> Recommend <br /> iff <br /> improvements with the neighborhood desire for■ ■ Improved <br /> access and for fair treatment of the adjacent homeowners who would be <br /> ■ <br /> heavily ■ <br /> ■ <br /> If Fairview Avenue 'is ever widened on the east side, the homes must be <br /> removed and the owners, fairly■ ■ <br /> evaluation recommendations are based upon 'Information and review to date, Further <br /> 'is recommended. <br /> The vehicle speed on Fairview between "13-2" and "C" should be slowed <br /> to reduce rear end�m <br /> accidents, <br /> recommended. <br /> Add a Sth center turn lane which will F widen lid Fairview <br /> Add a neighborhood connection to a stoplight on Fairview near <br /> Oakcrest West. <br /> i <br /> Review <br /> i <br /> homeowners. <br /> Purchase all homes ad G acent to Fairview because heavy 'impacts are <br /> III I <br /> expected. <br /> Redevelop the adjacent property into buffer with some housing 'if <br /> i <br /> ■ <br /> ossi <br /> Fairview to add a <br /> a, County staff would fimt recommend widening i i <br /> center turn lane for less ■ <br /> 'Interruption <br /> access. <br /> A County ■ ■ r <br /> ■ <br /> traffic.expected 'in the future with Increased <br /> b, County staff do not recommend Fairview as reduced capacityl/Width <br /> or one,,;way because ■i) too■ <br /> signal road, a parallel road running 'in the opposite direction would be <br /> ® ■County staff traffic■ which <br /> ■ <br /> traffic "warrants" a ■ <br /> area would benefit from but has not yet <br /> ■ An offset s <br /> ■ existing <br /> Intersections w III not work because the current gaps are too large with Oakcrest east or Rose Place and these <br /> alternative be negatively 'impacted by a stoplight at Oakerest west One <br /> 'is to add a Fairview lane f6r fight turns from the■ <br /> traffic,neighborhood merging into <br /> alternative The recommended <br /> connection Detailed <br /> 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.