Laserfiche WebLink
14 <br /> Alternatives <br /> 10 Deny the proposed lot division ]used on the finding that the <br /> proposal is not consistent with the City I s z on i ng ordinance and <br /> subdivision regulations. <br /> 2, Approve the request based on the finding that the proposal <br /> would he consistent with the City's zoning ordinance and <br /> suhdivis'ion regulations and would not he detrimental to the <br /> area. <br /> policy objectives: <br /> i To <br /> insure that development occurs consistent with the City's <br /> Comprehensive Guide Plan, zoning, and subdivision regu 1 at i ons. <br /> Staff Recommendation# <br /> 1. The proposed lot division represents a reasonable way to <br /> develop the property; The division does not create the need <br /> for setback variances f or the house on the north parcel and the <br /> south parcel, while not meeting the lot width requirements Of <br /> an R-1 zoning district, can support reasonable single family <br /> development without requiring variances. Therefore, staff <br /> recommends approval of the let division request at 343 W. Burke <br /> Avenue. <br /> Council Action Re nested: <br /> 1� , Motion to approve Carl Reule's request for a division of <br /> platted lot At 343 W. Burke Avenue. <br /> Staff Report by: Mike Falk <br />