1993_0927_packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Page 3 Assessments 9/27/93 The Public Works staff has met with Mr. Bosell to discuss this issue* Mr. Hosell seal coated the driveway approximately one year earlier than originally planned to have the portions of . the driveway match. The work was net completed to provide any strength to the driveway. 1t is recommended that the assessment be approved as submitted. C* We received a- written objection from Mr. Harry McKenzie of 2 501 W. County Road C. Mr. McKenz ie's property is approximately 1.3 3 acres with approximately 415 feet of depth and 109 feet of frontage on county Road �2. Mr o McKen z ie O s objection is to the storm sewer assessment in the amount of $1,008*58o This assessment was calculated by using the 1.33 acres and multiplying it times our factor of 3.33 units per acre. Mr. McKenzie is objecting to this 1.33 acre assessment. He states that a 5.8 acres of the property do not drain to 'the storm sewer system. The background information provided by Mr. McKenzie and field' verif ication confirm that a portion of this property does not drain to County Road C�2a Staff recommendation is that a one-unit assessment equal to $22"x.67 be levied against the property at this time, and the balance of $780.91 be deferred until such time the project is filled and the entire parcel benefits from the storm sewer. Mr. McKenzie has been contacted by city- staff and is in agreement with this proposal. 4.*1 R�92-03r Old Highway 8 a. primrose office Building partnership located at 3101 old Hwy 8 objected to the $24,747.45 assessment. The .objection is that the benefit to the property did not exceed the cost of the improvement. This item has been passed on to an appraiser to determine if the assessment is acceptable. City policy is to assess commerical and business property loot on construction projects o Staff recommendation is that the assessment stand as proposed and a decision made on adjustments at the time of the report from the appraisers b+ The second written objection received was from Mr* Doug Jones, the owner of the Roseville Townhomes located at 3085 Old Highway 8. Mr. Jones is objecting to the assessment of $320.25/unit for which the city has already been reimbursed through M* .A* fundinga He states that our policy does not assess R-1 and R-2 for improvements of -this type, but we do assess R-3 which is also a residential classification. He believes that this project did not increase the value of his property* This smatter has been turned over to the appraiser for a report to the September 27 council meeting.,