Laserfiche WebLink
iIV <br /> Page 7 <br /> Assessments <br /> 9/27/93 <br /> the contracto:: and explained to the contractor that they must <br /> address the situation. Within the last month, Mr. Owens has <br /> visited with the engineering staff again in regards to the <br /> damage to his home. <br /> It was recommended that he contact his insurance company to <br /> evaluate the situation. . his of Friday, September 17, 19930 the <br /> insurance adjuster had visited the site and and has recommended <br /> that a engineer review the damaged areas. This will be taken <br /> care of by his insurance company# Mr. Owens would prefer to <br /> use his insurance company rather than an independent testing <br /> company from the City of Roseville <br /> The city staff has contacted Mrs. Owens and has offered an <br /> independent testing service to look at the damages t determine <br /> if they were caused by the equipment operating in the area. <br /> In regards to the assessment, Mr. Owens is on a corner lot that <br /> abuts Woodru f r and SO McCarrons Boulevard and has frontage on <br /> both streetsi ; This property falls under the situation being <br /> bordered by a county road and a city street. The city policy <br /> with this type of arrangement is to assess the property based <br /> on the footage of the- city street with the understanding that <br /> the property will not be assessed for any improvements to the <br /> county road. •Therefore, it is deemed appropriate that this <br /> assessment is in accordance to our policy and should be levied <br /> as proposed. <br /> 7. P-9211111111111­02 and ST�9 -13 Neighborhood 73 <br /> a. This project received one written notice from Mr. Don Roberts <br /> in regards to the parcel at- 2 10 N. McCarrons Boulevard Mr. <br /> Roberts is contesting the assessment for $3,406.92 for the <br /> street improvements abutting his property. Mr. Roberts has a <br /> large piece of property that fronts McCarrons Street and N. <br /> McCarrons Boulevard. This parcel is approximately 3. 5 acres in <br /> size and has 308 front feet on M. McCarrons Boulevard and <br /> approximately 485 feet on McCarrons Street. We were informed <br /> that this par6el had been subdivided although we were unable to <br /> find any recoids of this subdivision. Based on that <br /> assumption, the property was broken down into three smaller <br /> parcels by which the frontage was determined on McCarrons <br /> Street. This also fell into the odd�lot formula and was <br /> calculated based on that situation for the frontage that was <br /> assessed. This parcel will also fall under the new odd-lot <br /> policy, and the assessment will be adjusted accordingly. <br /> b. The ffirst verbal complaint was from Mr. Zeece in regards to the <br /> parcel on Rice street. Mr. Zeece objected to. the amount of the <br /> assessment in comparison to the neighbor and felt that in past <br /> history has been excessively assessed for projects. In your <br />