My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
1993_0913_packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1993
>
1993_0913_packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/13/2011 11:33:29 AM
Creation date
10/13/2011 11:26:30 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
77
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
RE-QUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE; 9-13-93 <br /> ITEM NO v : <br /> Department Approval: Manager Reviewed: Agenda Section: <br /> Consent <br /> Item Descri Lion e Daniel Morton request for minor variance at 4 <br /> Crescent Lane* <br /> Ba cko ':oZu n <br /> 1. <br /> In the �l single Family Residential Zoning District, front <br /> and setbacks for buildings must he 30 feet from the street <br /> r i g ht�o f-wa . In the case of an attached garage, the setback <br /> can be reduced to 27 feet& <br /> 2 * The Morton's are proposing to add a 24X24 foot attached garage <br /> to the front of their house a This would allow them to remodel <br /> their existin g single car garage into a bedroom suite that <br /> could accommodate their son-in-law who has muscular dystrophy <br /> and needs handicap accessible accommodations. In order to <br /> lace the proposed 2 4X2 4 foot garage on the lot such that no <br /> place � d the Morton's are <br /> side yard setback would be require <br /> d$ <br /> requesting n 8 foot front yard setback. This would bring the <br /> g f <br /> front of the proposed garage to within 32 feet of the curb line <br /> and 19 feet of the front property line• <br /> The Minor variance Committee unanimously recommended approval <br /> of the variance e The Committee believed that the variance <br /> request was reasonable in that the opportunity to expand the <br /> house to the rear was limited due to the sloping p g rear yard and <br /> because -a typical expansion to a two car garage often requires <br /> 4 e and setback consideration. The Committee noted that it <br /> a side <br /> yard vehicles beyond the public <br /> will still be possible to park y p <br /> right-of#wayr solely on the Morton's property. <br /> 4s Aadjacent <br /> l l affected property owners indicated their approval <br /> of the proposed variances <br /> Alternatives: <br /> ■ <br /> Deny the variance based on findings that no hardship or <br /> tactical difficulties exist on the site. <br /> 2s Grant the variance based on the finding that a hardship or <br /> practical difficulty is present on the site, <br /> policv ob 'ectives <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.