My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
1993_0426_packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1993
>
1993_0426_packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/1/2011 9:23:28 AM
Creation date
10/18/2011 11:58:06 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
183
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
PETITION TO THE ROSEVILLE CITY COUNCIL <br />1, This is to.express our strong opposition to the special use permit <br />f of Patricia Curti s-s to , operate a beauty salon business out of her 'home <br />at 1987•Aldine and TO PETITION THE ROSEVILLE CITY COUNCIL TO DENY APPROVAL <br />OF SAlb PERMIT. <br />2* Such `a use of private residential property is most definitely <br />NOT in keeping with the character of our neighborhood and is a practice <br />we certainly do not want to begin to allow. <br />3. Commercial traffic is encroaching on more and more residential areas <br />in Roseville, and we believe that allowing such a special use permit will <br />only serve to spread that traffic into residential neighborhoods even more. <br />4, Our neighborhood is a quiet, peaceful little section trying to <br />maintain its privacy in-an ever - expanding sea of commercialism and the <br />attendant problems of increased traffic, vandalism and crime. <br />5. We want to keep business in the commercial zones where it belongs <br />and out of residential neighborhoods where we come dome to relax and live <br />in peace and quiet. <br />6. In addition, we are of the opinion that once a such a business is <br />allowed in even one home, it will have a negative effect on the property <br />values of the neighboring homes, which reduces not only.our resale values <br />but the revenues for the City as well.. <br />7, Further,, if one homeowner is given such a permit, we are concerned <br />that it leaves no •reason for denying other such permits in the surrounding <br />area - and we could not he more strongly opposed.to that prospect. <br />T'TTONE NAME ADDRESS COMMENTS <br />9 9�/,A/ Wetd,& <br />7 <br />rg <br />fk 0 -r CIO 'rl <br />r <br />IPA <br />. _ X407 <br />qb 3e <br />'ae we? e <br />L <br />-3(� 3 <br />C '7 go, <br />q 5 --3 r.1 u (P <br />jF <br />i <br />r <br />� g <br />�r <br />mar i� <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.