My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
1993_0426_packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1993
>
1993_0426_packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/1/2011 9:23:28 AM
Creation date
10/18/2011 11:58:06 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
183
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
determined by the'City Development review Committee. If <br />the Development Review Committee believes that the <br />design does .not fit within these guidelines. this <br />portion of the project will be referred to the Planning <br />Commission and City Council for an amendment to the PUU. <br />12. That ownership of the Simpson parcel be finalized be fore <br />any final approvals are given for the EUU that might <br />affect that property. A plan for interim use of the <br />parcel should be developed and reviewed by staff* <br />13 That as much vegetation as possible along the Creek be <br />left intact* <br />14. That the possibility of installing stop signs on Lincoln <br />Drive at the entrance to the independent living facility <br />be studied. <br />15. That staff review traffic count methodology <br />169 That the ponds be maintained by applicant and designed <br />to meet Metropolitan- Council recommended standards* <br />Staff should review and recommend a maintenance schedule <br />if appropriate. <br />17W That the applicant be encouraged to increase evergreen <br />materials <br />1 That there be strong architectural continuity for the <br />entire projects Staff should review all future <br />development to insure that continuity is maintainede <br />Two neighborhood meetings have occurred as well as a meeting <br />with the immed iartely abutting property owners e <br />LTENN RTES <br />l Deny the project based on findings that the proposed project <br />would not be consistent with the City's Comprehensive plan <br />and zoning ordinances and the project would be detrimental <br />to the general heal th r safety and welfare. <br />w * Grant the project based on the finding that the project would <br />� p � <br />be consistent with the City's comprehensive plan zoning <br />ordinances and would not be detrimental to the general <br />health, safety and Welfare. <br />POLIQX CBTECT1� <br />1. To insure development is consistent with the City's <br />Comprehensive plan and Zoning Ordinances. <br />To- encourage the development of housing which meets the <br />identified reeds of the community* <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.