My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
1993_0322_packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1993
>
1993_0322_packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/1/2011 8:41:56 AM
Creation date
10/18/2011 1:20:32 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
101
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: 03-22w--93 <br />ITEM No a: <br />iiummm <br />Department A oval: Manager Reviewed: Agenda section: <br />Hearings <br />Item Des cr i ion. John and Diana Farrel l ' s request for, vacation <br />of a portion of the Richmond (Chatsworth) <br />Street right -of -way, between County Road C-2 <br />and Millwood St. <br />r <br />Background. <br />l The Farrell I s have requested vacation only of the portion 0 f <br />the right-of-way adjacent to their property, <br />2* The city Council, in 1977, vacated a portion of the right -of- <br />way adjacent to the neighbor to the north of Farrell Is <br />property. The City did, however, reserve a easement for <br />roadway purposes on the property vacated. . <br />3* The Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval of <br />vacating the total street with the condition that a 30 foot <br />utility easement be reserved in the - center of the right -of- <br />way to be vacated. <br />4. Subsequent to the Planning Commission, City staff met with <br />the four property owners whose property abuts the portion of <br />the right -of -way to be vacated. . They expressed concerns <br />about the necessity for keeping the 30 foot utility easement <br />and over the additional assessments required. staff has <br />determined that the 30 foot utility easement will. not be <br />necessary. <br />Alternatives: <br />1. Deny the vacation based on the finding that the right -of -way <br />would be needed for future roadway purposes. <br />Approve the vacation based on the finding that the right --of- <br />way is not needed for street purposes <br />poligy objectives: <br />10 To vacate street right-of-way which is no longer necessary <br />for street purposes* <br />Staff Recommendation: <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.