HomeMy WebLinkAbout1993_0308_packetCITY OF ROSEVILLE
COUNCIL AGENDA
MONDAY, MARCH Be 2993
7 :30 p.m.
ROLL CALL (voting order: Cushman, Maschka, P. Johnson, Goedeke, V. Johnson)
An APPROVAL OF MINUTES
1, regular meeting of February 22, 1993*
B CONSENT AGENDA
1. Resolution in Appreciation to Marge Erwin.
2. Lake Owasso Safe Boating Association request for water -ski course
and water -ski jump on Lake Owasso.
3 . Approval of Bills,
C. HEARINGS
1, William Sievers request for Special Use Permit for automobile
service use, site plan approval, and setback variances at 1526 We
County Road . H
2, Public hearing for 1993 Pavement Management Program (PMP) Projects
P-93-02, Neighborhood 59; P-93-02, Neighborhood 60; and P-93-03,
Neighborhood 60.
D* ORGANIZATIONAL BUSINESS
1., Standing Rules of Procedure for 1993.
2, Council Appointments for 1993,
3. Establish Special City Council Work Session for March 11, 1993,
4. Establish Special City Council Work Session.
Es COMMUNI CAT IONS f RECOGNITIONS, AND PUBLIC COMMENTS
F • REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
1. Haz -Mat Physicals.
2. Acceptance of Concordia Meadows public improvements for City
ownership and maintenance,
3* Acceptance of Eldridge Avenue west of Fairview Avenue as City road
and utilities for public ownership and maintenance}
4. Amending assessment roll, St. Rase of Lima appeal, City Project P-
59 -16, P- 91 -0-31 P- 91- 02 -57.
5, Amending assessment roll for Terrace Drive improvement for former
Lincoln development parcels, City Project 92 -04,
6, Approval of Change order 1A, 2 and 3. and final coat ra ct acceptance
Public Works Garage /Water Booster Station reroofing, city Project
M-92-22.
7, Approval of Fire belief Pension Increase,
Go ITEMS REMOVED FROM CONSENT AGENDA
H* ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS
1. Resolution receiving petition and ordering preparation of a
Feasibility Study for public improvements within the right-of-way
for Lincoln Ur ive from County Road C-2 to Lydia Avenue,
2. resolution -- Community Development Bloch Grants,
I• ITEMS TABLED
J . OTHER BUSINESS
K . ADJOURNMENT
CITY OF ROSEVI? F
Regular meeting of the City Council - February 22, 1993. 7 :30 P*K
The City Council met on the above date with the following ROLL CALL
members present: Goedeke, Cushman, P. Johnson, Maschka, and
V. Johnson. Members absent: None.
An APPROVAL OF MINUTES
A -1 Goedeke moved, P. Johnson seconded, that the minutes MINUTES
of the regular meeting of February S, 1993 be
approved. Roll Call, Ayes* Goedeke, P. aohnson, and
Maschka. bays: None. Abstain: Cushman and V.
Johnson .because they were not present at than meeting*
Be CONSENVACENDA
Maschka moved, P. Johnson seconded, that the Consent CONSENT
Agenda, Items B -1 through Biz, be approved. Roll AGENDA
Call, 1, Ayes: Goedeke, Cushman, P, Johnson, Maschka,
and V, Johnson. i� ays None.
ne ■
B -1 Maschka moved, P. Johnson seconded, that the Mayor and
City Manager be authorized to sign an agreement with
the City o f St. Pau 1 for the purpose of providing the
City of Roseville with radio maintenance and repair on
a► time and material basis. Roll Call, Ayese. Goedeke,
Cushman, P. Johnson, Maschka, and V. Johnson, Nays,
None.
RADIO
MAINTENANCE
AGREEMENT
B -2 Maschka moved, P. Johnson seconded, that Stephen and STEPHEN AND
Joan Lethartfs request for a 2 foot variance, in JOAN LETHART
accordance with the City policy for driveway side
yard setbacks, at 2946 Mildred Drive be approved.
Roll Call, Ayes; Goedeke, Cushman, P. Johnson,
Maschka, end V. Johnson. bays: None.
B -3 Maschka moved, P. Johnson seconded, that the following DONATIONS
donation to the City of Roseville be approved + To THE CITY
Twelve Cans of Coffee
Brooks Food Markets
$50,00
Roll Call, Ayes: Goedeke, Cushman, P. Johnson,
Maschka, and V . , J ohnson . Nays: None.
B -4 Maschka moved, Pb Johnson seconded, that the Lake
Superior Steelhead Association request for a one Day
Off Site Gambling Permit to conduct a raffle on
February 27, 1993, at the Lido Restaurant, 2501
Snelling Avenue N. in Roseville, be approved. Roll
Call, Ayes: Goedeke, Cushman, P. Johnson, Maschka,
and V. Johnson, Nays: None.
1LIN
LICENSE
Roseville City Council Minutes
February 22, 199 3
Page 2
Maschka moved P. Johnson seconded, that the attachedoNT1ACTG
� 5 �
1993 Contractor Licenses be approved* Roll Call, Ayes: LICENSES
Goedeke, Cushman, Po Johnson, Maschka, and V. Johnson.
Ways: None,
6 Ma schka moved, P, Johnson seconded, that the attached BUSINESS
Business Licenses be approved* Roll Call, Ayes: LICENSES
Goedeke, Cushman f P. Johnson, Mas chka , and v f Johnson.
Nays: None*
aschka moved Pe Johnson seconded, that the following APPROVAL OF
checks and total amounts be approved: BILLS
Check Nose 36876 - 36888 15., 307.8
001 - 020 91,202.98
025 - 174 105,972.42
176 - 356 149,543x32
551 - 564 18 1 594.70
$543,621 *28
Roll Call,, Ayes: Goedeke, Cushman, Pa Johnson,
Ma s chka , and V . Johnson* Nays: None.
c e REARIWG S ■
C.1 Cushman moved, Goedeke seconded, that a public hearing SEASONAL
concerning seasonal banners and institutional signs be EAHHERS
continued to the regular City Council meeting of March INSTITUTIOPL6,
22, 1993. Roll Call, Ayes: Goedeke, Cushman, -P. SIGNS
Johnson, Ma s chka , and Ve Johnson* Nays: None.
Pt Johnson
n moved Maschka seconded, that Har Mar, HAR x"I INC.
Inc * f s request for preliminary plat approval at the
northwest quadrant of County Road C and Snelling
Avenue North be approved with the following condi-
tions
1. That all engineering work be completed and
approved by City staff before the final plat is
considered.
2* That a 20 foot transit easement be dedicated with
the understanding that if it is needed for transit
purposes, all parking, landscaping, and other use of the easement will be moved and the required
city front yard setbacks to the easement will be
provided.
3. That the title question related to the Gluek
parcel will be resolved to the satisfaction of
City staff before-the final plat is considered.
Roll Call, Ayes: Goedeke, Cushman,.P* Johnson,
Maschka, and V. Johnson. Ways* None.
Roseville city council Minutes
February 22, 1993
Maschka moved, P, Johnson seconded, that liar Mar, Inc.
request for final plat approval at the northwest
quadrant of County Road C and Snelling Avenue North be
scheduled for the regular City Council meeting of
March 22, 1993. Roll Call, Ayes: Goedeke, Cushman,
P. Johnson, Maschka, and V, Johnson. Nays: None.
Page 3
Flo REPORTS AND RE coM" AT IONS
F -1 Cushman moved, P. Johnson seconded, that Gary Voge l l s GARY VOGEL
request for fence height variance at 2775 Snelling
Avenue North be approved with the following condi-
tions:
1. That the fence be a cyclone fence or of similar
material.
2. That the fence not exceed 7 feet in height:
Roll call, Ayes: Goedeke, Cushman, P. Johnson,
Maschka, and V, Johnson, Nays: None.
F -2 P. Johnson moved, Goedeke seconded, that the agreement ROSEDALE AREA
between the City of Roseville and BRTirr1, to provide I S ROV
transportation engineering services as outlined in the TRAFFIC XGXTe
proposal dated February 4, 1992, for Stage 1A and CITY PROJECT
Stage 1B Concept Definition Preliminary Work for the 9229
Rosedale Area, 1VHS HOV Project, City Project 92-29,
be approved* Roll call, Ages: Goedeke, Cushman, P .
Johnson, Maschka, and V. Johnson, Hays. NoneR
F-3 P. Johnson 'Moved , Maschka seconded, that the ' C ity PURCHASE OF
Manager be authori zed to sign a contract for the LANGTON LACE
purchase of the property at 1895 Wiest county Road C-2 PROPERTY
as follows:
Purchase Price $255,000
(appraised price for 4.52 acres)
Less Fire lnsurarnce . Payment 7, 4
Net cost to city
$181,000
75,000 from the Park Land Fund will be utilized to
purchase this property, with the remaining cost of
$106,000 to be paid from the Park Dedication Fund.
Should such fees not materialize, payment would be
made from a property , tax levy over a five year period.
Doll call, Ayes: Goedeke, Cushman, P. Johnson,
Maschka, and V. Johnson. Nays: None*
Roseville city Council Minutes
February 22, 1993
Page 4
F -4 Cushman moved, Maschka seconded, that a resolution to SIRE RELIE��
increase the Fire Relief Pension benefit be continued PENSION
to the regular city Council meeting of March 8, 1993. INCREASE
Roll Call, Ayes: Goedeke, Cushman, P. Johnson,
Ma s ch a , and V. Johnson* Nays f None i
-- Liman moved, � � s �hk� se
condec� , that the meeting be lOURl�ii�ERT
1 Cue ,
adjourned at 8:15 p.m* Roll Call, Ayes: Goads,
Cushman, P. Johnson, Maschka, and Ve Johnson. Nays
None.
Vernon A. Johnson, Mayor
ATTEST:
t o 7 en R, S a rko z , city Manager
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: 3/08/93
ITEM NO ■ #
Department Approval: Manager Reviewed Agenda Section:
itConsent Agenda
Item Description: Resolution in Appreciation to Marge Erwin.
Attached is a resolution in appreciation to Marge Erwin upon her
retirement from the City of Roseville.
COUNCIL ACT .1ON REQUESTED:
Motion adopting the attached resolution in appreciation to Marge Erwin
upon her retirement from the City of Roseville.
EXTRACT of MINUTES of MEETING of THE
CITY COUNCIL of THE CITY of ROS EVI LLE
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the city
Council of the City of Roseville, county of Ramsey, Minnesota was duly held
on the 8th day of March, 1993, at 7:30 p a m e
The following members were present
and Members absent* -
Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION No;
IM APPRECIATION To MARGE ERWIN UPON HER RETIREMENT
FROM THE CITY of ROSEVILLE
WHEREAS, Marge Ervin has served the City of Roseville with loyalty and
dedication for a total of fourteen years as a Police Records Specialist;
and
WHEREAS, Ma rge' s performance of her duties and responsibilities was always
characteri
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DATE: 3/08/93
ITEM NO
Department Approalf Manager Reviewed. Agenda Section:
Consent Agenda
Item Description: Luke Owasso Safe ,Boating AssOCiation request for
water -ski Course and water ski jump on Lake Owasso,
Background
The Lake Owasso Safe Boating As iat i n has, for a number of years ,
received approval from the City of Roseville for a wa►teri ski course and
jump on Lake Owasso. In the initial years, the residents. closest to the
proposed location of the course and jump were advised that the Council
would he Considering the request.
In regent years, the Council has approved the request without notifying
res 'dents, In 1988, the Council did instruct staff to-notify the affected
residents. This notification did not result in any significant objections
-to the water ski course and jump.
Recommendation
It is recommended the Lake Owasso Boating Association request he approved.
COUNCIL ADT I DN REQUESTED:
lotion adopting a resolution approving /denying Lake Owasso Safe Boating
Association's request for approval of waterski course and water -ski lump
on Lake Cwassg for 1993+
EXTRACT of MINUTES OF MEETING of THE
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY of ROSEVILLE
Pursuant to due'call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the city
Council of the city of Ro seV 311 e , county of Ramsey, Minnesota was duly
held on the 8th day of March, 1993, at 7:30 pam
The following members were present
and , and the following were absents
Member introduced the following resolution and moved its
adoption4b
RESOLUTION No 0
RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL of A
WATER�E SCI COURSE AND WATER - s RI JUXP ON LANCE OWAE So
WHEREAS, the make Owasso safe Boating Association has requested
approval of a water -ski course and water -ski jump on Lake orassoI and
WHEREAS, the Lake Owasso Safe Boating Association has received
approval for a water -ski course and jump on Lake Owasso for a number
of years* and
WHEREAS, there have bee no significant objections to the waterski
course and jump;
NOWT, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City council of the City of
Roseville does hereby recommend to the appropriate governing authority
that the Lake Owasso Safe Boating Association request for a water-ski
course and water-ski jump on Lake Owasso be approved.
The notion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly
seconded by Member , and upon a vote being taken thereon, . the
following voted in favor thereof
and , 4nd the following voted against the same: None.
WHEREUPON said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
STATE OF MINNESOTA).
SS
COUNTY OF RAMSEY )
I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified city Manager of the City
of Roseville, county of Ramsey, State of Minnesota, do-her ' eby certify
that I have carefully compared the attached and foregoing extract of
minutes of a regular meeting of said city council held on the 8th-day
of March, 1993, with the original thereof on file in any office.
WITNESS My HAND officially as such Manager this day of March �.
1993*
;30,3o
Steven R. Sarkozy, city Manager
RANDY J STANLEY
411 HORSESHOE DRIVE
SHOREVIEW, MR 55126
MR. STEVE EARKOZI
CITY MANAGER
CI'T'E' OF ROSEV` LE
'2266,0 CIVIC",' CF:' 7ER
RO- SEVILLE, MIN 55113
L)E�.}�: �•� =.. SAR'.,Nr I:
r * t-. �• � � � .�, � ti � f. �--ti —r � � *--� .--. rr. �. "r r, 1 � � ti . r 1.
�� *� + 4 .ter-, T ■ T �� prz � z r+'.f ■ �r ■ �T � �' -r�Y•ti � -7' {•I � t.trt+-
� • L' �'•� i_. 0 . 1 i ti �� 1 L A , � A + 7 L' V� A l l� i ZE �' ■ A W A i rr n t .L
A�tiL� A WA S1 2 ."JM.F X LA � C W A S v I N 7.1 C TIE��. C+ lL "a LE. VI Ew AND L R ' V
ARL
w-. � , —. r. tit's r" T' r � l'' � r. ri -,r .--� r �� y 1 y ice. L • r r• ■ , rL�Lai... T1`1 1T Vi���+��i iO!�i� a...E�iTIF CA ; L.S iiir.71L1ail" 1 Dr.
RAr. SE'� CC; :�T`Y I LL EE h UE + '1I TTEL) T D THE DU i " S R OF L E � �:-
A F'+ }RUV AL.
�'HE CIRSAX.12" DTI ON HA=-' ASSIGNED THE �i.F� _-E��I��' AND � �l�'TA��A'�'� �� ��r � ±Z
T1 A: E r -�i L 4$ i • TO-
'
�J t
JA UN UI TEVI S
450 H0RZE�H0E DRIVE
EHOREV I EW, MN 551626
(612) 484 -5 17
THE P LAL: �� iENT AND MAINTENANCE OF THE W ATERSK I COURSE IS ASSIGN "Ell
TO:
DEANE R. ANKL.AR
3153 EAHICY H00H DRIVE
ROEEVTLLE, MN 55113
( 612 ) 464 -498'
PLEASE ADVISE RANDY STANLEY WHEN THIS ITEM W l LL BE PLACED ON THE
I L 0 S AGENDA.
EF CT`F'U
f
RAN ":.'Y J TA JiE Y
462 -0286
him ' L
lb
■ W f
■
a.
2 dii -b 9L 1
yy , i 3
'% !
lb r - 89W,
■ r
91 % a P # ID2 ,
rt � �6_ - �_ue
�` ■ *
■
I.
I.
' ■ Ilk N
0 as 11W ■F—
am IN,
■
ale ■ i ,
a If ■ t f dr. Pill
■a■ i ■ its i •- ■ 4 1 J4
Lis■ 1 L
r* #• i . "�
ease A. ii ■a � t
a * i lb i a i # a a ■ ■
8 ■ . ■ y IN
Map • i. ■ Ir
111 i i a + A l e # f �� 1 � �
r .w
Z0 ININ
+ d — OP 40
up Joe
.� +`� i _ # LIP iii
IN
..•
■ • i � i ■
_ t i ■
t •
1 + + +
. ■ .808'0
�N ■
a s is o
i
* ■, III *r �* � � � ■ �� �
If
loop
Opp
�� ■
as +• r�• 4P a
DID, v
IF
r
AN •'� � f i i �
Pp r fii a # i
Ni ft
04 49
IN IN.
rp
Ar
00 IN
1 ■ * ■ f i +i
* � a■ I � � * Gr t i ■
�i 61 r i
�4 a
� ■tit �, � ■�i Pit � i� i i i i ■' i� � i �� i
Apo
li
a a +• Iii ■■ ' t ,.. i� .i �:i i
i i ■_. f _
+' ' 0 � T•! f 14'MY
- ■
■ ,NNNNNNA ph ** ri ■ ■�� a■ *��r
Xb, -. mm,
# #w -i rides +i 0.
•
IN
Is a 0 ai i ,� I
i iiiiii ■ i i
dot
■ i i
i i!
'L +
i ii ■.ii :� �. *,;* .'- �.
r. a ■■ �i� ■i i i i
■ * � ��i ■
' +
mo
IL i
a ' � . • � r i i �
A ■ * ■■ * F'a a f i ■ i �� �� ■� ! MAN
00;
4 00 80
■
16 4111
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: 3 -8 -93
ITS NO. i
Depar zee Approval .* ' Manager Reviewed: Agenda Section
C2! r
t Agenda
Xtem Description:
Approval of bills
Actin req st d: 'Approval of 'the following bills and total amunts
CHECK REGISTER REPORT
BANK:
Date: 03/04/93
COUNCIL BILLS MARCH 8r 1993
Time: 8:35am
Page:
City of Rose►ri
L Le
i- l
-ifii- -iii
' iJ��i--
EilTi- ii- !ll�liii---
Check
Vendor
Number
Date
Status
Number
Vendor Name Cheek Description
--- -!!ft- ii- i -i - --
565
-- i =ii - iiiii
02/17/93
--rlf- it ii---li!!l
Printed
Tiii--
R001
Ri-I- T---- iriilli-
ROSEVILLE COMMUNITY BANK
38,805.30
566
02/17/93
Printed
8001
ROSEVILLE COMMUNITY BANK
4275.51
567
02/17/93
Printed
9596
NN DEPT OF REVENUE
726.74
568
02/17/93
Printed
0714
UNIVERSITY OF NN -VET DIAG L
65600
569
02/17/93
Printed
2050
CITY OF RDSEV ILLE -YSB
156.97
156 . 97
570
02/18/93
Printed
0225
ICNA RETIREMENT
966.46
1 607 .OD
571
02/18/93
Printed
0308
SIN MUTUAL LIFE
,
i 851.00
572
02/18/93
Printed
0309
MN STATE RETIREMENT -DCP
j
25.00
573
02/18/93
Printed
7975
GREAT WEST
1+705.
574
02/18/93
Printed
1221
CITY COUNTY CREDIT UNION
90.00
575
02 18 3
Printed
1224
PERA
228 :00
576
02/18/93
Printed
1224
PERA
5B.0O
577
02/183
Printed
7086
UNITED WAY OF THE 5T. PAUL.
34.64
578
02/18/93
Printed
T034
RALPH �J OVERHOLT
290
579
02/18/93
printed
912+
WINONA CTy mUMAN SERVICES
,17
256.74
580
02/18/93
Printed
0303
MN BENEFIT ASSOCIATIONS
581
02/18/93
Printed
122 ►
PERA
24, alO.94
582
02/1"3 3
Pri rued
1224
PERA
583
02/243
Printed
7427
BYERLY'S
Total Checks. 19
•
Bank Total. 89,796.65
i- l- iiii-- it -lfii
TotaL Checks: 19
Grand TotaL: 89,796.65
COUK1L SILLS j1 ARCH 85, 1ID93
3-01-93
584
Rosel awn Cemetary
1.00
3-01-93
585
Ramada 'lnai ssance Techworl di
155.90
3 -02 -93
585
City of ;;asevil le - Payroll Account
1319413.53
3 -03 -93
587
Minn. Dpt. of Revenue
772,25
3 -03 -93
588
Roseville 8o unity Bank
379589.81
3- 03 -95-
589
Roseville Community bank
4.5. 3,47
3 -03 -93
59.3
Law Enforcement Labor Services
760, 03
3-03-93
591
Loral Union #49
664.o85
3.03-03
592
Local Union #328
258,00
3 -u �- Y
5_93
inn, 5ta a Retirement System
1,921.00
- �
X94
ureat West
25, 0.0
3- 3 r �
59,E
t . C . M, A + Retirement Trust
5
3- �3 -93
596
Minnesota Mutual
14622,09
3 -93 -93
597
City and County Employees Cram t Anion
149739,00
3-33-93
599
Wi bona County Human Services
210 . 17
3-03-93
599
United Flay of the t . Paul Area
'58 . D
3-o3-93
500
s;
World Travel Network
(33,J3
3 --03 -93
601
Ordway Music Theatre
u
85,75
195,535,50
CHECK UGI STER R'EP'ORT
BARK:
Dotes, 1&M
CHECK REGISTER FOR 2116M
Tine: 4;2o"
City of Reeevi t i e
iiiiiii
ore # i we= iiiiiii#
iiiiiii!' i ash
iWiit Wfiiiiifii ii## iiiiiiiiiiiii= iiiiiii= iifiiffiiiii = = = =iisitiiiiio
Pep: 1
iii iiiiiiiiii*
Clwk
Check
herder
i
l
NuiWr
Date
RtitLo
iii
Nobor
ii i i i i ii Mi iiii####iiiilitiii'isfii
vendor Now Choock Description
iii iii#i i i i we i ii as 9 Gem iii = =iii iii i #ii ii iii
= iii i i i ii i is i =* fiiii iii
ii as sow iiml=it
359
i i Eiiii we
02 118M
viii iiii*
Printed
1502
A i l LOCK SERIF I CE
37.00
339
02/1&M
Printed
1091
AN EQUIPMENT 6 SU"LY
70.72
360
02/18M
Printed
TO 17
AFTO N CRU I EE LILIES
300.00
361
02119/93
Printed
0069
AIRSIGNAL INC.
264.43
362
021133
Printed
5161
ALLY RECITAL COSTUMES
36,95
363
18M
printed
0073
AMERICAN FINANCIAL PRINTING
50399102
364
02/18/93
Printed
0014
AWRI CAI. LIKEN
1380
365
0211
Printed
7021
ARTS EXTENSION RERwI CE
45975
366
01&3
Printed
1967
ASAP #IGNS
140 100
367
02119M
Printed
i 993
AT 6 T CONFER PRODUCTS
19.35
368
193
Printed
1210
AT &T CREDIT CORP
369
02/1&M
Printed
M7
AWD COOLERS
34695
370
02113M
Printed
1322
DE ER ARENA P%AXUCTS INC
X184
371
02/16/93
Printed
gs"
BELL ATLANT I C
16936
3n
02/12/43
Printed
ales
KAREN BELLING
6.10
373
02I18M
Printed
0730
REST LOCKING SYSTEMS
11.03
374
02/18/0
Printed
M97
OF[ ACTION D I SPO'SAL *
61.17
375
02/1&M
Printed
2022
11ZHART
969"
376
02/193
Printed
OD"
MARY PAT BLACK
140,00
377
02#1 M
Printed
0007
BOYER r
13673
373
02118M
Printed
7373
LONNIE NOW
307,72
3'
02/193
Printed
9614
■Rw
13.602 929
360
02/12/93
Printed
2076
DEBRA BUNDGAARD
35900
331
02/18M
Printed
$424
MERRY BURP I CK
03.00
302
02110/x'3
Printed
1379
CAPITOL CITY MUTUAL AID ASSN @
410000
303
02/18/93
Printed
0101
CAPITOL COIM I C AT I ONS
� v
384
02#12/93
Printed
0009
CATCO
#42
385
02/153
Printed
1
CATH.CQMM OF CORPUS CHRISTI
750800
3K
0211 9/43
Printed
0723
CELLULAR ONE
14 *03
307
02/12/93
Printed
T024
CENTER FOR APPLIED PSYCH* INC,
12650
3e0
02/iB/93
Printed
T020
CENTRAL RAMSEY bRTERSHED MW
4411
309
012113/93
Printed
T019
CITY OF FALCON HEIGHTS
14030900
390
02110193
Printed
X050
CITY OF ROREYILLEiYS9
153903
391
02/18/43
Printed
0632
CITY OF ROSEV I L LE
346.02
392
02/10/93
Printed
$133
COPY WLICATING PRODUCTS,
321;46
393
0211&M
Printed
0134
COPY DUPLICATING PRODUCTS
64.02
394
02113193
Printed
0593
COPY EODIPMENT INC
191931
395
02110/93
Printed
7M
CSC CREDIT SERVICES, INC.
10800
3+96
02/18/93
Printed
0139
DULGREN SHARD LOW ABM LOAN
13g%3,82
397
02!10/93
Printed
1366
DALE BOYDj CPA
623975
18M
Pri nted
1940
3EAI1 NOW
447930
399
021101'3
Printed
3673
DECATHLON ATHLETIC CLtla
2p4W.73
400
0 fI8M
Printed
1026
DEXTER
326.17
401
13/93
Printed
1966
EAGLE DISTRIBUTING CO
310900
402
1 &M
Printed
9462
EASTMAN KODAK
635.63
403
02/1W"
Printed
899
ELAN F i NANC I AL #ERIC I CES
90 934
® 404
0 1BM
Printed
ago
ELM FINANCIAL SERVICES
19995
405
02/1&3
Printed
1329
FASTENRITE
11113
406
021188
Printed
2oiD
FIRST INAZE
9941
407
021183
Printed
3700
ULLERY PHYSL TNERAPY CTR
177.00
400
U/18/93
Printed
$101
RICE, GERLACH
182400
409
GZ/IAM
Printed
0033
OWNER SEARING _
-16
410
02119 3
Printed
2ur
SWHER STATE ONE -CALL# INC
1N964
411
0211019'3
Printed
0795
GOMMENT TRAINING SERVICE
0I.00
412
02/W93
Printed
0340
NANCE COMPANIES&
1 40
CNECE U0I STER REPS'
NAND:
Date: IBM,
CNEC'R REGISTER FOR _ .1 18143
Tim; 4 a.
city of Ri L l e
!ll a &aamM!lsiftt
"Mm iiaaaamaas
##Vtt&0i
0000*# aural wW# W## t=!!# i! i!!# t!!! i!l 4bwi!!l iiftw wmftw&maaa!lriww!*w0
P f 3
a a asaaaawoMID
Ch k
Vendor
Number
Date
ftetw
#iii#!
Number
#!f!! #t#!#liiii#
11eR r Name Meek Description
iiil iiii# i# iiii!# EE!# i0!!!# i# i#!! iil i### f# i! ell ii !!!!!!!!#f!E##i!!
ant
#!!!!!!!!f!web
4113
lif##;!i###!!!!!!
"l131P3
PH nted
0205
NAR MAR LOCK E KEV
43.83
414
02/1&M
Printed
0948
NARNIUNS' R PRO GOLF SALES
3679"
413
Ufl&fn
Printed
ROB
SARAH IIARTIA I CK
4900
03
OVISM
Printed
12BB
NESS SURVEYING IN T NTS
E0 -000
411'
1&M
Printed
20"
NKKS 3 GRAVEN
3v60,00
410
02111M
Printed
1310
NUDSON NAP C0
148136
310
i M
Printed
7157
NUMAN RELATIONS CONSULTANTS
30.00
1&M
Printed
0751
IDENT I -KIT COMPANY INC
. 36.00
421
UJI& '3
Printed
06-
I11MAT IVE HICROGRAPNICS INC.,
3+1.00
021119/93
Printed
2134
119TERIIATIaM OFFICE..
533f3T
423
02/1&M
Printed
7
I NTL OFFICE SYSTEMS
137 #34
424
021131' 3
Printed
5175
1SFS1
60000
4n
021I BM
Printed
07
TIN KLEIN
130.00
426
18/93
Printed
5355
JOHN KNOWLTON
31035
4
18/93
Printed
0251
KNOX LIAR CO
23.61
M
0211SM
Printed
0710
KM UA4BER COMPANY
14'0068
625
02/1314x3
Printed
1323
KLMDE CO IRC
37950
4x39
02115193
Printed
81B6
LEBENS FLIERS.
*63
4131
0/15143
Printed
2141
LORENZ ItX SERVICE INC
125 900
432
UJISM
Printed
20"
ELMER LWR I EN
WO24
133
021131'43
Printed
1227
LUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVI CE
3j 0110 *00
436
OE11 9/43
Printed
0276
HACQUED EQUIPMENT
660.15
435
02MM
Printed
1456
MARK IILL I K SALES INC
2030-
18143
Printed
12"
MARSDEN SLDO MAINTENANCE
x•00
437
02118M
Printed
0281
M SUPPLY CO
25029
4
1&f93
Printed
2069
MCI TELECOM MUN i CATIONS
1137 640
4
18143
Printed
0
MIT SUPPLY INC
30139
"D
02/1&M
Printed
7130
NESSERLI S KRAMER
13 51 .00
"I
02/1 43
Printed
Udw
NETRO I ASPECT 1 011 SERVICE
4
0R11&M
Printed
2003
ISTRO WASTE CONTROL CM.
4A3
02113143
Printed
QDD3
NI CRO AGE
02118M
Printed
02"
NIPYA►Y FORID
430 e'
"S
02/13193
Printed
7w
MIRMY SPEED SKATING CL IJS
400000
446
02118/43
Printed
1155
FIRST PARTS PLUS
2s?l
"?
02#10
Printed
0673
MIKE'S TREK 3 TRAILER REP.
65,79
4
02l143
Printed
0301
MIKES PRO CHOP
346,00
4A4
02113193
Printed
T025
KINNEWTA FIRE AGENCIES PL1RCH
36000
4W
02113143
Printed
2040
RiN1JTENAN PRESS
26000
451
10/43
Printed
0310
101 STATE TREtMER
377o34
432
0211&M
Printed
0313
a VALLEY TEST 1MG
77000
433
02118M
Printed
loci
WRCON CONSTRUCTION
58131.00
414
01118M
Printed
0516
RI TA MORTENSEN
3800
4133
WfiSM
Printed
01 4
000 PNOTO
33,w"
456
02118M
Printed
JAKE NW
" 100
457
NJUM
Pri ntRd
am
NUN I CI LITE CC
4M857
Al
02/1&M
Printed
2320
NUTS OF AMERICA
215 962
459
02114M
Printed
9563
N156P .
4E *00
4W
0211g/43
Printed .
4612
JM ICE NAOEAU
10120032
461
32/1&M
Printed
ow
MWI NI FIRE M11PNENT
VAS
W
OZ118M
Printed
T027
UTIONAL INPRIMT 4MRPORATION
18950
4
01t01R3
Printed
3182
ELSONIS OFFICE 0"LIES
143.41
QK
02113#43
Printed
3101
ELIZABETH NELSON
10d,
4
02110!43
Printed
T026
JAMES 3 00ROTNY NELSON
""Soo
4
02/13143
Printed
3D'43
IOTCARE
067 -w00
A67
02113143
Printed
IIO, SUBURBAN CON FERENC3 0
360900
CHECK REGISTER REPORT
SARK:
Date: R/18M
CHECK REG I RTER FOR 2/18/93
Time, 6:30w
city of ROeevi l Ie
Pop: 3
Check
Mack
Vendor
lumber
Date
Statue
luxbor
vender "m O k Description
t
660
02/i a/93
Printed
7309
MTN IEMIDR I AL NED I CAL CENTER
79,00
1 93
Printed
0M
MT N STAR I NTERNAT I OMIAL
43,, 686.00
670
02113M
Printed
0566
NORTHERN NYDRAIILICSi
19r *77
671
02119M
Printed
0361
NORTilERN STATER PAR CM,
32008,101
672
0RI1 '3
Printed
19
NORTHERN WATERWORKS SUPPLY
Er930f65
473
0/10/93 -Printed
PHYLL I # VANS
356.05
676
U/18/93
Printed
20M
PA * ENTERPRISES
61,43
675
18/13
Printed
Me
PAPER UMNOM
5`1065
676
02/18M
Printed
0360
PETERSONgKLLgCONVERZEvJENSEN
735,
477
02/1&M
Printed
1103
POSTMASTER ST, PAUL MN
232800
670
02113M
Printed
0365
PRINTERS SERV INC
$6.00
679
i&fE
Printed
91"
PRINTING SYSTEMS
$61 069
680
02118M
Printed
1507
PRINTING TOMORROW TODAY
535M
461
OU1&M
Printed,
11631
PUBLIC SAFETY EQUIPMENT CO
*00
0193
Printed
9511
RADIO INSTALLS
13 *70
02/10/93
Printed
0163
LWSEY COUNTY
3 #760906
02/15!93
Printed
0163
ROSEY COUNTY
56315.00
6N
U/18/93
Printed
0163
A M#SEY COIJNTT
370766.13
i
02/1&M
-Printed
3196
RAMSET CTY DEPT OF PURL I C RLYN
30.00
687
0311 2/93
Printed
T023
RAVI CN, RTERg KIRKMAN 9
315,00
02/12/93
Printed
8220
REGIONAL MUTUAL AID ASSOC
10000
00 689
02/12/93
Printed
RIGS 6 8M )ADS
60.00
490
1&M
Printed
7559
ROLL I NHS OIL CO
117153
691
/i0/93
Printed
0396
ROSEwI LLE RADIO
150
492
02/10/93
Pr ii nted
0405
9 1 T OFFICE PRODUCTS
42.51
02110/93
Printed
1271
#AFWAY STEEL PRODUCTS
02/12/93
Printed
9831
SAVOIE APPLY COv INC
a"
02/1El93
Printed
T016
ARLENE SHACKLE
nose
4%
02113M
Printed
0420
SNORT ELLIOTT HENDRICKSON
1,v136,10
697
02/12/93
Printed
T022
NIRCHIE FINDER PRINT LAS.
39■66
693
UJI& 3
Printed
7690
RAN SKITH
65850
699
02/10193
Printed
rom
JERRY SPARTE
24900
500
02/12/93
Printed
YM
JON SPOTT ,
98000
5O1
02/1x193
Printed
2016
ST, PAUL 8= i STATIONARY
63.73
502
0211 9193
Printed
7137
STAR TR I TRINE,
56.00
5013
02110/93
Printed
1725
STATE CNENI CAL CO
313.14
504
OZf 10~93
Printed
5055
SUBURBAN NARDIARE
20.67
505
92/1 SM
Printed
0636
SUBURBAN TRUE VALLIE NDWE
57o_74'
5x06
02/19!93
Printed
3
T A SCH I F SKY i SONS
613 *30
507
02110193
Printed
70RA
JIM TWLETON
303065
SU
02/12/93
Printed
0449
M GAS RII WBAN PROPANE
241M
SM
OEl12/93
Printed
7091
THE KI LLIiAN CORPORAT I OBI
S O 309.00
510
02/12/93
Printed
ODES
JEANNE TN SON
1 -w00
511
02/12/93
Printed
3169
N1 CRAEL THOMPSON
350
513
02/18193
Printed
3015
TIE SYSTEMS MINNESOTA
165,00
513
02/1&M
Printed
1235
TKOA
4, 845 ,"
516
18/93
Pointed
0057
RONALD TOY
90000
315
U11&M
Printed
0966
T LET FM
736 .657
516
02/1&M
Printed
9557
TRI COUNTY LAM ENF OFF AM
45.00
517
-02/i2/93
Pr I nted
3006
WIN CITIES TRANSP i RECOVERY
BAD
510
02112/'93
Printed
7420
TWIN CITY HARDWARE
9.66
519
101'23
Printed
0471
UNITED WAY
30,10
520
N/18/93
Printed
0473
UIN I TOG M TAL SERVICES
0.67
331
Wj 1 &M
Printed
202.
IIS WEST
28091986
522
02/12/93
Printed
0027
VIKING SAFETY
100
CRECK REGISTER REPORT
II -.
Date: MUM
SCR REGISTER FOR 2/18/53
Tim: 4 &ZOM
City of Rri L Le
iiii 'iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiitfiiiWOO
iiiii aft iiiii !!liilii*tiMMMom*if#aiii Oman Man #i am* ii =iiiW+iii
Poe: 4
Mae iiiiiim
i avow awe=
i16fto-k
Check
Va r
i #r
Date
status
i
Nu ar .
i i i i i+ i a i MM i i
VWidor Ua k Description
i i i i i i i i i i a&=== i r W i i i f i iii i i i i i OM i i i i i i t i t i i i i i i i i i# i i#* i i i+ w i i i i no i iii
t
i# i i
i i i t i
SZ3
iii i -a i i i i
U118M
i am we fit i t i
Printed
t
991E
VIKING TWWE DMANY
i i** i i i i# i
3 .M
324
02/18193
Printed
MIS
VI LTER NWFACTURING CORP,
MO sOlD
325
02/1
Printed
04M
WM LIGHTING
172*03
SM
02/18/93
Printed
0514
W. If, GRAI NGER
*68
527
a/I&M
Printed
1378
HASTE EMT aBLAINE
250 -028
82118M
Printed
2573
WAVE CAR WASHES
U3.
18M
Printed
7456
MARGARET 1IUR
U.SG
02118M
Printed
7U2
JIM NEIVEN
140000
511
GI/18M
Printed
0492
WEST PUBL=SRING
iG1
02/14M
Printed
1459
WI TTER GOLF
1 1 #dMdr
533
02/1&M
Printed
0960
ZACKS INCORPORATED
164.01
Tetei Chi: 176 Bnk TeteL*
381r "2616
TotrL k5: 116 Grind Totes*
38Il 418
CHECK REGISTER REPORT
L4XK'
Dete:
CHECK REGISTER FOR 2/25/93
Tim: 11:32M
c1ty of ROSi L Lei
fti## i## i#
a##! i##t
# iimaWwM## fffff wee= ii### f#• ii#** Mfwiffif wow mntft *it#ww##fffif
--
*## = = = = =i#aMae( w
mm i# i##*
Check
Check
On —P4 r
Neer
Date
status
N r
er r Name Check Deseri pt ion
i #iffi##wmm#i#ff##fiifi#iiaa=
Ammint
=mimes =am f...see= mum mmm
1 102
mim#iiifmMwamefii#imMW
02/25/0
Printed
MM=== wi/ i#
0001
iiii# wwii# OWN #t
AMERICAN ARBITRATION ASSOC.
100.00
1103
02,x25/93
Printed
0953
AMERICAN ENGINEERING TSTO
3 #693 ;7Q
1106
02M/0
Printed
8030
A TCO CONSTR WION
26000 -00
1105
U/25J93
Printed
Im
AT 8 T COXKlNER PR=UCTS
143,93
1106
02/25/93
Printed
9M
CONNIE LANNERS, BEN MY
1,336 *88
1107
02#25!43
Printed
0565
BFI ACTIN DISPOSAL
06136
4.079
1105
02125
Printed
2022
BIZ RT
2
1109
02!25/93
Printed
9311
GRINETER GROUP INC,
,P151,34
20,000,00
1110
02/25193
Printed
R429
NEfiOU 8 ASSOCIATES
13
48413A3
1111
02125
Printed
1278
CANNON COMIMICRTIONS CO
111E
02/25M
Printed
2112
CAPITAL 1MICAL LAS
'S5
101 n
1113
02125M
Printed
OODB
CAPITOL C I TT WELDING
•
60.33
1114
02/25193
Printed
0101
CAPITOL COM MICATIOMS
I 00
1115
02/25/93
Printed
R
AUWST CEDERSTRAND
g5w,
133652
1116
02/25193
Printed
1968
CHARLES PECHIN
182605
1117
02M/93
Printed
5162
COCA -CM A BOTTLING MIDWEST
1113
02/25/93
Printed
0691
RERS AIR EOII I PKENT
6.26
1119
02125/93
Printed
0595
COPT EGLJIPMENT INC
400a
42A3
1120
02/25193
Printed
17595
WUREN DAVIDSON
12000
1121
02/25/93
Printed
1653
EDAM
344,OZ
1122
02125193
Printed
1"I
EXECU'TONE SY ST EMS OF ST PAUL
1123
02/25/93
Printed
7009
FACE TO FACE CM SELING
28365 -951
1126
02/25
Printed
0576
FEDERAL EMPRESS
16.50
1125
02125193
Printed
2024
FORTIS BENEFITS
1
1126
02/25/93
Printed
T03 i
FROKL I N WA ST
'ti_
1127
02125x93
Printed
7855
GENERAL MEDICAL CORP
.33
1128
0 25/93
Printed
7980
GLACIER PARR COMPANY
F
i3eD59.72
1129
02125
Printed
0013
GOA CORP
385o,96
10600.00
1130
02125/93
Printed
R031-
OFF OWS
73000
1131
02193
Printed
0116
GROUP HEALTM# INC
5000
1132
02125/93
Printed
9543
DENISE NAWKINSON
180100
1133
OU25
Printed
1250
HENNEP I N TtCHKICAL COLLEGE
1136
02!25/93
Printed
7509
AMID NMJCK
350,00
84022
1135
02x25/93
Printed
116?
SRO 31"LT COW ANY
100
1136
02/Z5x93
Printed
219+0
loo, CHECKING GUIDE_
100,96
1137
02125!93
Printed
0 3
I NNO' AT I VE MICROGRAPHICS I NC .
1130
02/25193
Printed
3194
I PMA* N I NNESOTA
25
42.00
1139
0/25193
Printed
2077
TISHA KENN
91,26
110
02/25193
Printed
2197
ERISS PREMIUM PRODUCTS INC,
1141
02/25193
Printed
5271
L.E. T ok,
388.0D
750071
1142
0212 A0
Printed
0572
NA AREA Ut I L CONTRACTING
1143
U125/93
Printed
R025
LANGSETH CONSTRUCTION INC,
4000600
11
02/25/95
Printed
1964
LALNGHL I NS PEST CONTROL
55 -01
1165
02M/93
Printed
T030
MIKE LAVELLE
1000
800 00
1166
02/25193
Printed
R037
MARCO CONSTRUCT IN
!
63.03
1147
02125193
Printed
1407
RRAIT2 PATNt CO
M
1148
25/93
Printed
1637
NA MARD ELECTRONICS
*75
25.00
1169
02/25/93
Printed
1027
NIXE IICDONNALD
96025
1150
021251ff
Printed
819'5
AM =AT
5x655.53
1151
25/93
Printed
8550
MICA CHOICE.
OTAO
1152
02125193
Printed
8550
MICA CHOICE
1V540000
1153
02/25/%-
Printed
1312
MMICS TRAINING
A4,00
1156
021 193
Printed
1556
1SA TURF CORFERENCE
IGC
�
1135
02/25/13 Printed
0003
III CRO JIGS
+51
16677
1156
02125193 Printed
1i55
NIDWEST PARTS PLUS
CNECK REGI$TER REPORT
BATIK
0ste; 022 M
CHECK REGISTER FOR 2/25/93
Tim: 11.Mam
City of Rosevi L L e
ii #iiifiiififEiiiaw"MmwwM
= =me WOi==
Mafat iiiiwiffi0fiiiifiif fiFiwMMM
Poe; a
=eve a iiiiiiii= = =we MMMMMiiif
F '�
Check
Vendor
Date
status
liimfwwi*
Mader
ifiiiii mama
Vendor Nam Check Dneripitfon
/ iiiiiiiffiiiiaii ! #ii*#mattiif *i* MOM=a mfmwi = =fine&iiiitii
Amount
mesa i
1157
*#i aMwMwwiiiiii!
02/25/93
Printed
T032
MINNEAPOLIS FIUNCE DEPT.
ti /!*twit
120900
1158
02M/93
Printed
2201
NINKSOTA S *C.1 „Ao
0 15000
1155
Printed
T029
M STATE VMXUPMTS AUM,
80900
1160
02/25!43
Printed
0313
iN VALLEY TESTING
90,00
1161
02/25/43
Printed
3300
10000
116E
02/25/93
Printed
19?0
W, PR I NT
124,97
1163
02/25/0
Printed
Nos
N I ELSEN 8 MATES
3 .j810e00
116+
!25/93
Printed
0341
NORTYEAN STATES PAR Cam,
34gW,50
1163
02/25/93
Printed
M013
2AR►RY 08N ARA
N101600
1166
02/25'3
Printed
2178
PARK LIGHTING
101030
1167
0212SAG
Printed
0770
QUICKSILVER
81150
116B
02/25/93
Printed
1728
RAMSEY CO PUBLIC MMS
345886
1169
02/25
Printed
0143
RAMSEY COINTY
37v766A3
1170
02/25
Printed
2465
ROBERTS DEVE LSE MST CO,
55926
1171
0+2/25/43
Printed
Im
GERALD RUETTIIU
271”
1172
02, 25/9'3
Printed
1216
LIMA RUSSELL
200610
1173
02 25 3
Printed
4831
GAVOIE SUPPLY Dag INC
M63
1174
02MAM
Printed
2154
NIKKI SNAP I RC
40880
1175
02M/93
Printed
1624
SH IELY ANY
=89T
1176
02/25/03
Printed
3158
SHOREVIEW CITY CENTER
304100
1177
02125M
Printed
0420
SHORT ELLIOTT NENDR I CMCSON
U9,71
1175
02/25/93
Printed
1645
MffRWESTERN TEMNICAL COLLEGE
2V800900
1170
02/25/93
Printed
IRS
8T JOREPH' S EDU I PMENT
3 'r807m
1180
02125/3
Printed
8471
ST o PAUL PIONEER PRESS,
54000
1181
02/25
Printed
T028
ST, PAUL WINTER CARNIVAL
306,00
1182
02125/93
Printed
0429
STAR TRIBME
337
1183
0212SAM
Printed
1958
STATE TREASURER
10617
1184
02125AM
Printed
203E
STEELE CONSTRUCT I01I
26000,00
1185
02/25M
-Pr1rited
7197
IOWSON PUBLISHING GRMJP
=100
1186
OZ/ /93
Printed
9320
TWIN CITY CONF,
=woo
1187
02125/+3
Printed
1424
UaS, WEST, CELLULAR,
9 #40
1188
02/25193
Printed
0467
UNIFORM UNLIMITED
1548'66
1189
02!25193
Pr it te'd
0473
IAN I TOG RENTAL SERVICES
Well
1190
02/25193
Printed
0472
UNITOG
418 #02.
1101
02l2'SM
Printed
2319
US NEST CONKMICATIONS
1 Ip333,79
1192
025193
Printed
2034
,EIS BUILDERS INC
211000900
1193
02/25193
Printed
8187
LISA W=RUF F
Mae
1194
02/25/93
Printed
A033
C. YOUNG
21p000,00
Totes Cheda* 93
8enk Total: 144 673,
Tote L Checks* 93
• i i i i i M i i• i i i i i i i
8rwW Tots L : 1"8674996
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: 03-08-93
ITEM No . . a ...I
Departmo t Approval: Manager Reviewed: Agenda Section
Hearings
Item Description: William Sievers request for a special use
permit for an automobile service use, site
plan approval and setback var i-ance s at 1526 N
County Road H.
Background:
11 This request is to allow the applicant to construct a Jiffy
Luke facility -on the site formerly occupied by a Total Gas
Station adjacent to Ha.r Mar Mall.
2a The Planning Commission, on a 4 -1 vote, recommended denial
of William Sievers request for special use permit for an
automobile service use for site plan approval and setback
variances at 1526 W. County Road H.
3, The City ounc i 1, at the request of the applicant, has
continued this matter a number of times, most recently until
Larch 8, 1993w
4, The appl i cant has requested that the application be
withdrawn,,
Staff Recommendat ion
1�, It is recommended that the City Council accept withdrawal of
William Sievers request for a special use permit fo-r an
automobile service use, site plan approval and setback
variances at 1526 W. county Road E.
council.-Action Reque sted :
1. Motion to accept withdrawal of Wi' lliam Sievers request for a
special use permit for automobile service use, site plan
approval and setback variances at 1526 W." County Road B,
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: 3/8/93
Department Orval w Manager Reviewed
ITEM NOSE 0." - cplmo
Agenda Section.
Hearings
item Descripti *n: Public Improvement Hearings -- 1993 PMP
Background: on August 24, 1992, the city council selected neighborhoods
for the 1993 PMP and ordered the preparation of feasibility studies for
these projectse on February S. 1953, the council ordered public
hearings* Public hearings will be' held on March S. 1993, for the
following projects
P-23-02, Neichborhoog -� street reconstruction
Huron Avenue, Ruggles Street to Roselawn Avenue
Dellwood Avenue ,,'Ruggles Street to Roselawn Avenue
F- 3-02, Neighborhood �_� street reconstruction
Autumn Street, Fernwood Street to Le 4ngton Avenue
Summer Street, Fernwood Street to Lexington Avenue
Ruggles Avenue , Fernwood Street to Lexington Avenue
Roma Avenue, Dellwood Avenue to Dunlap Street
Dionne Street, Dunlap street to Lindy Avenue -
Dunlap Street, Dionne Street to Garden Avenue
Dellwood Avenue, Roma Avenue to Garden Street
Lindy Avenue, Dionne Street to Garden Street
P -93 -0 ei hbo od 60 -- street reconstruction
Garden Avenue, Hamiine Avenue to Lexington Avenue (MSA)
Chapter 429 public improvement provisions would apply as follows:
Is 4/5 council vote required if project was initiated by staff or city
council or petition of less than 5% of affected property owners
2. Each project must have a separate public improvement hearing.
To facilitate the hearing process, staff suggests the council follow the
attached agenda for each hearing. Draft feas-ibil ity • reports were
distributed to the council at the February S, 1993, meeting. Final
copies of feasibility reports for each project are attached.
Policy objectives: Each feasibili
Page 2
1993 PMP
3/8/93
Program conforms to Pavement Management Program goals -- rebuild 4 to
miles of "problem" residential streets per year and provide
. * � "problem" streets with curb and
required maintenance of permanent proble3n
gutters
Pro`ect costs financed according to assessment policys
3. Construction standards met for proposed street widthst utility
replacements, etc e
pina � ncial implications: The attached sheet summarizes the total
estimated construction cost for all 1992 PMP projects. The table
' costs for all projects for which general obligation improvement
includes �� p ]
bonds will be sold and the projects assessed. The table does not
include-Municipal
State Aid projects hi ch do not require outside
bonding,
The annual bond to finance the PMP has been 2 to .5 million
per year including local street projects as well as any city
dollars p �
contribution ion for Ramsey county or Mn DOT reconstruction projects. The
proposed program is within past budget quidelinesi
For projects ordered at the March 8 and 9, 1993, public
hearings, we suggest the following schedule
Mar.
1 -
Mar. 26
Plan preparation period
Mar*
22
or Mare 29
Approval of plans and specifications and
authorization to advertise for bids
Mar.
Apr. r .
Ad for bids in Construction Bulletin
Mar.
30,
Apr. 6 & 13
Ad for bids in Roseville Review
Apr*
21
& 22
Bids opened
Apr.
23
Review bids
Apr*
26
Bids awarded
May
10
Start construction
Staff Recommendations: lotions: Staff recommends the council order all public
improvements heard on March 8, 1993, or continue final approval of the
projects until March 22, 19 9 3 *
REco MNDED COUNCIL ACT ION
Adoption of resolution ordering projects P #93 02, Neighborhood 59F
-93 -0 Neighborhood 60, and P- 93-03, Neighborhood 606
P � �
Mmstimated 1993 Construction Bond Summary*
PMP Neighborhood
Street Cost
Storm Cost
Total Cost
58
521,657
180,105
701,762
59
97,914
0
87,914
60
617,596
0
617,596
62
275,834
0
275,834
66
166,653
0
166,653
Ramsey County Project
Hamline Avenue 1 185,084 30,492 215,576
TOTAL 1 1,864,738 1 210,597 1 2,075,335 1
' These estimates include PMP bonded projects only.
Estimates Include a 10% contingency factor but do
not include engineering or financing costs.
MSA projects are not included in this summary.
AGENDA FOR PUBLIC IXFROVEXENT SING
1993 IPXP
March Op 1993
A. Mayor calls the meeting to order and announces the purpose of the
meeting and format for the hearings
"This is a public improvement hearing to consider whether public
improvements should be constructed. Thd decision will be whether
the City ouncil wishes to proceed with the public improvement
� i �
project. The decision will not be made at this time as to what the
assessment rates will be or how the project costs will be
allocatede That will be dame at a separate assessment hearing when
the project is completed *"
"These projects were initiated as a result of staff recommendation
For staff initiated projects or projects not petitioned by more
than 35% o f affected property owners, for the project to be ordered
a S vote of the city council will be necessary. The council will
consider a resolution ordering the improvement or continuing the
hearing to a specific future date."
THE FOILLOWING AGENDA ] ff I LL FEE U&O,-FZD AS THE FORMAT FOR THE _ BLI C HEARING
B, C itv Man ages comments _ including project number, brief description
of project, published and mailed notices# and written objections
to the project:
P-93-02. Ne i ghborho od _L 9 -� street reconstruction
Huron Avenue, Ruggles Street to Roselawn Avenue
Dellwood Avenue, Ruggles Street to Roselawn Avenue
P,,93-02, Neimhborhogd 60 �. street reconstruction
Autumn Street, Fernwood Street to'Lexington Avenue
Summer Street, Fernwood Street to Lexington Avenue
Ruggles Avenue, Fernwood Street to Lexington Avenue
Rona Avenue, Dellwood Avenue to Dunlap Street
Dionne Street, Dunlap Street to Lindy Avenue
Dunlap Streetf Dionne Street to Garden Avenue
Dellwood Avenue, Roma Avenue to Garden Street
Lindy Avenue, donne Street to Garden Street
F -93 -03 Neighborhood 60 street reconstruction
Garden Avenue, Hamline Avenue to Lexington Avenue (MSA)
City Manager comments for public improvement hearing
It is suggested for the public improvement, the city Manager read
the r o ` ect number and provide a brief description of the project.
Also,, a genera 1 comment should be made regarding the
� � . published and
mailed notices. This should include the following language;
III
"Published and legal mailed notices have been provide d for this
project. Legal notices appeared in the city's legal newspaper, the
Roseville Review, on February 23 and Larch 2., 1993., Mailed notices
were sent on February 26, 1993. Affidavits of mailing are
available in the office, of the Public Works Directors"
Page 2
3/8/93
Prior to the hearing proceeding, the City Manager should read all
written 'objections for the project.
c. Fnc neer provides specific information for project including existing
conditions, proposed construction, sp6cial conditions, and schedule.
D. i ce Director` provides specific information for-project
including cost estimates and financing model.
E. Mayor opens hearing to public. speakers are requested to
identify themselves and the street address of the property to which
they are referring.
It is suggested that the following comments be made by the Mayor:
"In an attempt to provide everyone an opportunity to be heard and
yet conduct the hearing in an efficient manner, we would suggest
that rules be used for the hearing for this project. These would
include the following:
I. Individuals should identify themselves by giving their name
and address and should speak into the microph -one.
2. Try to designate a neighborhood /block spokesperson to represent
area and summarize comments.
3. Each speaker should limit questions and comments to two to
three minutes.
4. No person will be heard for a second time until all interested
persons who-wish to speak have had an opportunity to so.
5* Be courteous. No comments from audience or applause during
question/ comment period. i
6. A maximum of 30 minutes will be allowed for question comment
period for residents."
Mayor closes hearing.
After all citizen comments have been completed, the Mayor should
indicate that the public hearing is closed and turn the hearing
over to the city council for action.
I Council action on improvement. Resolution ordering improvement
and preparation of plans and specifications for project.
(Resolutions to be prepared by Public Works Director.)
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
Department Approval:
Manager Reviewed:
Q��6
DATE 00 3/08/93
ITEM NO
Agenda sedtion
organizational Business
Item Description: Standing Rules of Procedure for 1993.
The City Council, at its Fel
Standing Rules of procedure.
Rule 9f on Page 2# No, 2,
Agenda" and the present '' D .
E,
Rule l 3 on Page 2, has been
Item E*
Druary 23 work se siun, discussed. the 1993
has been changed by adding I'D. Consent
other purely ministerial matters' becoming
changed by adding "and PL V =i-�io Comments" to
The Council may desire to make additional amendments.
COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED:
Lotion adopting the 1993 Standing Rules of Procedure for the Roseville
City Council with the change in Mules 9 and 13, on page 2 as proposed
above.
1993 S TAMD I G RULES of PROCEDURE
RULE 1,w Regular eetl .
Regular meetings of the council shall be held at the city
Hall on the second and fourth Mondays of each month at ?:
p.m. Regular work sessions of the Council shall be held
on the first Tuesday of each month at 7:30 a.m., and on the
third Monday. of each month at 5900 p 0 m . Such meetings may be
rescheduled, from' time to time,, when scheduling conflicts
occur.
RULE Special Meetincrs and Work Sessions.
special meet i rigs and Work Sessions, including Executive
Sessions with legal counsel to discuss pending litigation,
must be called at the request of at lust three (3) members
of the Council,, or the Mayor, or the City Manager, - only
those items specifically agreed upon in advance shall be
considered* At least twenty -four hours advance notice must
be' given to all members of the Council prior to the holding
of said Special Meetings and Work Sessions, and such notice
shall also be posted on the City Fall Bulletin .Board at least
twenty -four hours in advance of the Special Meeting.
RULE 3. Emergency Meetings.
Emergency meetings may be called at any time, providing all
members of the Council sign waivers of notice prior to the
hoping of such emergency meeting.
RULE 4, uorum *
Three (3) members of the council shall constitute a quorum.,
RULE 5. Minutes
As soon as a quorum is present-, minutes of the previous
meeting shall be approved as presented or accepted after
corrections have been made.
RULE 6.11, Motions.,
Any motion, by any member, shall be reduced to writing upon
request of any member. No motion shall be put to vote until
it has been stated by the recorder at the request of any
member of the Uounc it ,.
RULE 7 , Minutes of Motions
After a motion shall be stated by the recorder, it shall be
in possession of the Council,. but it may be withdrawn at any
time by the Council Member presenting the motion before being
amended or acted upon. All motions and amendments thereto
shall be entered upon the minutes and the vote thereon,
whether they be adopted or rejected.
RULE 8* Petitions. Memorials.- etc.
Petitions, memorials, and other papers addressed to the
Council shall be presented by the presiding officer or by a
member in his /her place, or may be read by the recorder at
the request of a member of the presiding officer. All pati�
tions, memorials, and other communications which may be fil
with, or delivered to the Manager prior to the meeting of thy:
Council shall be brought before the Council by the Manager.
1993 standing Mules of Procedure
Page
RULE 9. Vote,
1. Roll call shall be called from the presiding officer's
right to his /her left, except the presiding. officer
shall vote last.
2e Voice vote may be . taken for
Ai Approval of Minutes,
B# Withdrawal of 'items from the Agenda*
C. Continuation-of items on the Agenda,
D. consent Agenda,
E. Other purely ministerial matters.
Each individual ' s Grote shall be ent,.red in the minutes.
4.6 Any member may abstain f rom voting 'or disqualify
himself/herself. The reason for disqualification or
abstention must be stated by the member and entered in
the' minutes i If a member disqualifies himself /herself,
he /she may leave the room while the issue is being
considered.
RULE 10, Ordinances.
Any ounc i-1 member may request the city Manager to prepare a
proposed ordinance. There shall be a delay-of at least two
weeks between the initial presentation and final vote if
such proposed ordinance is requested by a Council Member .
RULE 11+ Mules of Order.
The rules of parliamentary practice embraced in Roberts
Rules of Order (Revised) shall govern the Council procedure
in cases to which they are applicable and to which they are
not inconsistent with the Standing Mules of Order and Busi�
ness of the council.
RULE 12 0 Suspension of Rules .
No rule of the council shall be suspended without the
concurrence of at least four (4) members of the counc i l '.
RULE 13. Order of Business
The following shall be the order of business of the Council:
A. Approval of Minutes
B. Consent Agenda (Optional)
C. Hearings
D. organizational Business
E. communications, Recognitions, and public comments
F. Reports and Recommendations
G, Items Removed Prom consent Agenda (optional)
H. ordinances and Resolutions
1993 Standing Rules of Procedure
RULE 14 .
RULE 15 a
I. Items.Tabled
J. Other Business
Adjournment
Page 3
(1) The City Manager may include a Consent Agenda section
as an Order of Business,
(2) Consent items are considered as one item, requiring one
motion for approval . and one vote.
(3) If anyone wishes to discuss a consent item separately
cr'vote on it as an individual action, that item can be
separated from the list and considered with the regular
agenda. The rest of the consent Agenda would then be
adopted with the one motion, one vote procedure.
seating of council.
The seating of the Council at the Council Meetings will be
rotated Each month.
Consideration of Items not on the Agenda,
An item not on the Agenda may be introduced and discussed on
its merits. Before such an item may be approved or denied,
the Council must, by unanimous voice vote, agree to consider
the item, If a unanimous vote is made, all adopted Rules r
Procedure, except Rule 1, shall apply.
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: 3/08/93
. "11'."EM NO 9 -%�- 07 nw-"
Department Approval: Manager Reviewed,, Agenda Section:
Organizational Business
Item Description: Council Appointments for 1993.
The following are various appointments made annually by the Council.
The names shown in parentheses are those discussed at the February 23,
1993 work session.
1* City Council
Acting Mayor can lea s chka )
2, Pl anninq _ omm_iss ion
A. Chairman (Jim DeBenedet )
3. City Council - Liaisons
A. Planning Commission Liaison (John Goedeke /Pat Johnson)
Be Parks and Recreation Commission Liaison (Joanne Cushman/Dean
Maschka )
C. Fire Department Liaison (Dean Maschka /Vern Johnson)
D. School District Liaison ( Pat Johnson /Joanne Cushman)
E, Human Rights Commission (Pat Johnson)
41111 Cites Coul'lc i 1 _ _ D- eleciates /Alternates and Staff Representatives
to outside organizations
A. Ramsey County League of Local Goverrnments (Pat Johnson /Dean
Haschka )
B. Northwest Youth Family Services Delegate (Dean Maschka /Pat
Johnson)
C. Association of Metropolitan Municipalities (AMM) (John Goedeke
Joanne Cushman)
D. North Suburban Cable Commission (Joanne Cushma n Dean Ma schka )
E. Municipal Legislative 'Commission (MLC) (Vern Johnson /John
Goedeke)
F, Rice Creek Watershed District Technical ,Advisory Co=- ittee,
(Steve Gatlin)
G. Grass Lake Water Management organization Technical Advisory
Committee (Steve Gatlin )
H. Central Ramsey Water Management organization Technical
Advisory Committee (Steve Gatlin)
I. Suburban Rate Authority Director (Steve Gatlin /Laura Kushner)
J+ Minnesota Police Recruitment Hoard (Jim Zelinsky /Steve North)
K, Civil Defense Director (Steve Sarkozy /Tom Alleva)
L. Chamber of Commerce (Vern Johnson Dean Mas chka )
COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED
Motion approving Council Appointments for 1993.
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: 3/08/93
ITEM ND.: D-3
Department Approval: Manager Reviewed: Agenda Section:
Organizational Business
Item Description: Establish council Work Session for March 11, 19939
The vista 2000 Study Groups have completed their reports and are
prepared to present them to the City Council. It is recommended a work
session be established for the presentation of these riaports.
COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED:
Motion establishing Council work session for Thursday, March 11 19930,
beginning at 7 :00 p.m* in the Roseville City Mall for the purpose of
meeting with vista 2000 Study Groups and to receive the reports of the
groups.
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
Department Approval:
Manager Reviewed:
DATE: 3/08/93
4
ITEM! NO * 0 �`
Agenda Section:
organizational Business
Item Description: Establish Special City Council Work Session.
The City has advertised for applicants to fill vacancies on three of
its standing Commissions. The number of vacancies and applicants for
each Commission is as follows:
No, of No of
ommission Vacancies Applicants
Human Rights 1 7
Parks and recreation 2 4
Planning 1 10
It is recommended a work session be established to interview applicants
for the various Commissions.
COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED:
Motion to establish a special work sossion on Friday, March 12, 1993,
beginning at 5 1,5 p. m. f or the purpose, of interviewing candidates f or
Volunteer Commission appointments,
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION Date: 03/08/93
Itens No.: V-, I
Department Approval: Manager Reviewed Agenda Section
Reports and
Recommendations
Its Description: Hax -Nat Pbyoi cala
The City has entered into a joint powers agreement with New
Brighton and Lake Johanna for the provision of Haz -mat services.
Personnel involved in that program are requirdd to have annual
physicals. The City of Roseville has 11 persons who currently
participate in that joint effort and their annual physicals are
estimated to coat $2,162.
g; narieia1iicatio�s
When the joint peers haz -mat team was established, it was under-
stood by the City that 'arty costs incurred would be covered by a
haz -mat fee on the users of such materials. his the Council is
mare, that fee discussion is still in process and it is hoped
implementation will tape place in the near future f
wee tioFn
taf f is recommending the cost of the annual haz -neat physicals he
paid from the contingent account with reimbursement from the pro-
ceeds of the haz -mat fee when it is implemented.
Council Action
Motion to accept the staff recomendation that the cost of haz -mat
physicals in the amount of $2,162 he allocated from the contin-
gent account with reimbursement from the proceeds of future the
haz -mat fees.
$EQIIEBT FOR COIINCIL ACTION DATE: 3/8/93
ITEM NO��
Department Approval: manager Reviewed: Agenda Section:
Reports and Recommendations
Item Description** Acceptance of Concordia Meadows public improvements
for city ownership and maintenance
B ackgrouU M Recently l, improvements for the Concordia Meadows project
located north of T . H . 36 and iced iately east of Dale street on the
concord is property were completed. Rottlund comp any , the project
developer,'has now requested that the city accept the public
improvements on the Concordia sites A letter from the project engin" eer
is attached noting the work has been completed in accordance with city
speci f ications o Aso-built plans have been submitted for the project
along with required testing and inspection records
According to past agreements with the developer, the city will
responsible for ownership and maintenance as a public street c Lovell
Avenue from Dale-Street to Minnesota Avenue. This section of road has
been constructed in accordance with the city standards* In terns of
utilities, we will be responsible for ownership and maintenance of
watermain on Lovell Avenue from Dale street to Minnesota and storm sewer
on Lovell Avenue between Dale Street and -Minnesotan Avenues Storm sewer
constructed within the project on public easements to drain the ponding
area will also be the responsibility of the city. Appropriate easements
have been conveyed through the plat for access to these utilities.
Attached are maps showing the public improvements which will be the
responsibility of the city.
Policy objectivese Developers have two options when proposing new
projects within the city regarding public improvements* These include
1•. Petition the city to have the project constructed by the city
contractor and then assessed against the property
2. Hire a private company to construct the project as per approved
plans which
City staff will make final inspections upon — :�m'pl et ion of the prcj ect to
insure that work was done in accordance with:' our standards i If the work
is adequate, the city will accept the project and assume future
maintenance of the new public facilities
Page 2
Concordia Meadows
3/8/93
Financial implications oo This project has no major financial
implications for the city, since the developer constructed the project
and paid all of the improvement costs*
staff recommendation: Since the project has been constructed according
to city standards, staff reoends the following action:
1. Acceptance of Lovell Avenue from Dale Street to Minnesota Avenue as
a public street for city ownership and maintenance
Acceptance of watermain from Dale Street to Minnesota Avenue as a
public utility for ownership and maintenance
3. Acceptance of storm sewer system on Lovell Avenue between Dale
Street and Minnesota Avenue including lateral extensions to drain
the on -site holding pond for ownership and maintenance as a city
ut i l i t ■
RECOMMENDED COUNCIL ACT ION
Motion accepting Lovell Avenue as a city roadway and authorizing the
maintenance of utilities and roadway as per city policies.
February 3, 1993
tvil Engineers i Land Planners* Lard Surveyors * Landscape Architects
Mr. Doug Strong
City of Roseville
2660 Civic Center Drive
Roseville. Minnesota 55113
RE: Concordia "eadcws
P.E. Job #90267
Dear Mr, Strong:
On behalf of The Rot t fund Company, Inc., we request final acceptance of the
Public improvements to the subject project, The imorcveeents have , been
constructed in accordance with the City of Rosevll,le Standards. The .record
drawings have been submitted under a separate cover. Please find enclosed a set
of testing reports and inspection records.
If you have any questions or need additional information. please call.
Sincerely,
PIONEER ENGINEERING, P.A.
I(eo
Paul J. Dherne, P +E.
PJE: blh
cc: Don Jensen, The Rot t fund Company, Inc.
Bob Rcsenquist, City of Roseville
Enclosure
,A A&I smummmm =ui ir, 11161 a 'i Ili i9 1 a aim m0u " N ' Af,, -P 'u � ll 41 IV 4 P V�ft A 110 11111111 i il' "mmvi u ,1, II m�` "'m' 1Ili
do 6111 Ik
am
IT
AOP
"pubb" r _
i i
.y F i ! '
� t
■ i ■■
Arr
`
ME
fiL
{ r
I V/
ape
Li
do
No
r
1 !
_■
J
i '
op
I
_ rr i ■
mom
y+ y Ir
IF
MR I
#
Im 16
IS . t.
dr
j
r
�� i b ' • Jy r ■fir i � MEN
ui
Sh
Ile I+
ul
ON
46 Sh
0 ;�� �� t ddp 1 I
db
llama � � ...: �
.r" I ,
- ,� ..�... .�. f 1L I4pI'I�
Y + - ti! ■ 1 am ~ 7 IN
D mmsp l �1
IV I. j
suvac--mop�MM OWN
'limb SL
r
� e
i mmmmmmm,f �F .
N
IF
_ AS
AO
%M,
. .
Zd
MAOAP'MPP ML
ObOOP
4.
iNiiiiiir
ORELF
FIN
.Ism mom
son
fm
rl
am
JOAO
N%j Li
OL
JI, 14
VON
ui
LLI
it mp
Lb
CD
1p m NNW NN
IN
NN
ib
lit
wdhmr Orr IN
op low
IL
1:10 pll
0 6, lilt
INN
lk NOW
-ft owl, ILM
.0 woe loomho fik�
AL got 9`011rb via
AV.111PN
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: 3/8/93
ITEM No.:
Department oval. Manager Reviewed: Agenda Section:
Q�x� Reports and Recommendations
Item Description: Acceptance of Eldridge Avenue west ' of Fairview Avenue
as city road and utilities for public ownership and
maintenance
Background: Recently, construction of Eldridge Avenue west of Fairview
Avenue was completed. The work . was done in conjunction with the
redeVel opment of the corpus Christi site. A summary of the project is
attached from the project engineer, Mr. Dennis Brown.. The work included
the construction of sanitary sewer, watermain, storm sewer, and a
residential cul -de -sac street. The letter from the engineer indicates
that the work has been completed in accordance with the plans and
specifications and is ready for acceptance as public facilities. Also,
we have received a letter from Corpus Christi requesting that the public
ownership and maintenance begin.
Policy obj e c tive s e. Developers have two options when proposing new
developments within the-city: ".
1._ petition the city to have -the project constructed by the city's
contractor with costs assessed to them
2. Dire construction done for the project as per approved plans
and specifications by the City of Roseville.
City staff must make final inspection to assure that construction was
completed in compliance with city standards. If work is adequate, the
city then accepts the project and assumes maintenance for the new
facilities. This process has been completed for this improvement.
Financial implications: Work such as the Eldridge Avenue project
generally has no major financial implications for the city because:
1 Developer chose to construct the project and finance all
construction costs
2a All project costs were paid loot by the developer.
However, in this case, there were minor costs paid by the city for
backyard drainage improvements along the common lot line between
Eldridge and Skillman as a result of previously existing backyard
drainage problems. The city has agreed to finance minor regrading and
engineering costs from storm utility funds.
Page 2
Eldridge
3/$/93
commendation: Since the project was constructed according to
city standards and a letter has been received from the engineer along
with certified as�hui It plans, staff recommends the following:
1 Accepp tance of Eldridge Avenue west Of gkillman roadway and
utilities
2. Authorization to maintain Eldridge Avenue and appropriate
p ublic. utilities as city street and public utility systemse
REcO ENDED COUNCIL ACTION *
Notion accepting tin � Eldridge i d e Avenu.
e as a city roadway and authorizing the
maintenance i tenance of public utilities within Eldridge Avenue as per city
policy*
DENNIS E. BROWN P.E.
CIVIL IL ENGINEER
8009 Quail Avenue North
Brooklyn Park, Minnesota 55443
(6 1 2) 560 -4906
December 21, 1992
City of Roseville
2660 Civic Center Drive
Roseville,- MN 55113
RE: Construction Certification
Eldridge Avenue,• Corpus Christi Addition
Attn : Steven D.4 Gatlin P.1.1, Director of Public works
I hereby certify y that the 811 sanitary sewer and 6" watermain on
Eldridge Avenue from Fairview Avenue to cul -de -sae 611 feet
west
have been constructed and tested as specified and shown on the
plans,' and are ready for public usage .1
I also certify that:
2411 - 6" Granular Borrow with Geotextile stabililzation,
" crushed Class 5 Aggregate Base,
D4 1 8 concrete curb and gutter.-
4" polyethylene drain tubing at low point#
15" and 181' RCP storm sewer and catchbasinsj.
1 1/211 OOT 2331,- Type 31 -B - bit=irrous base
1 1/211 OOT 2331$- Type 41 -A bituminous gear
have been constructed and tested as specified and shown on the
plans and this street is ready for public usage.1
Construction Record Drawing is submitted with this Certification
for your files.1
Sincerely,-
Dennis E .q Brown,- P .,E *,
Hn., Reg., Igo., 7442
cc: Corpus Christi
Burschvi lle Construction
ED, G., P ud and Sons
Op
4F
l�
* FEB
Catholic Community of Corpus Chrosto,
1449 North Cleveland Avenue St. Paul, MN 55108
(612) 644 -0992
February 3, 1993
City of Roseville
2660 Civic Center Dr.
Roseville, Mn 55113
Dear Sirs.
I am writing to inform you that all requirements ements have been met for
the utilities and street on Eldridge Ave. west of Fairview, Corpus
Christi Addition.
The contra tors Burchfield Construction, will furnish a one year
maintenance bond for utilities effective upon your acceptanc'e .
S' erely.
Rev. Robert C. Nygaard
Pastor, Carpus Christi Catholic Community
cc. Burchfield Construction
Dennis Brown. P.E.
J
Z �
w _J.
N
■
,
dc
GIL
cc
v
a �
OIL
J
Z �
w _J.
j 46
t9b * I t4
>t
� IMP
sf
N
■
,
dc
�
cc
v
a �
j
Q
cc
0
1 �. -i -� lip • '
j 46
t9b * I t4
>t
� IMP
sf
f�■
�f
■
,
dc
WP
I■ i � I
CL
i
1 �. -i -� lip • '
yr• lot
r r •i' i.a
QL
S
j 46
t9b * I t4
>t
� IMP
sf
t
�t
4i 5
lk Olds
IN 0 over ■ frmp, <* 4V1 AV wmv + dr
% +r +�
a ; #� f f r�t,l� . ■�!r ■`tip` LL ■
tip' r _+f J /� _ _+ + ■R. ■ir
r IMP 4MW i ! i i i I on a IF i i t M l i!! !! i
am. ♦ k
"
, ts
LEM
1 f + I
I 1
?to 1
n 4aw qpm�w
IP
Ode t
raffift
am
1 r
}
r w
y �► 1 IN
Ag� 0000
r
i• _ dw mow
+ k
r , OPP
5.f. !a%.
,�r�� i�f.•■� t I M1 � MEW _rte MW
i E _ ■. i ! tit �� r
■ } t 1 0 ri 1
1 1 r� r� *�.• I
� f �' , r 1 i
+ r N f r A r r ' t : I
' �_ S rR f ` � ` r I �■ 1
I OW + r t o- + ` 1 ` 1
.{ r' r+�
I f
OF 010 .0
IF F
4F 14 • 1 S' 4
ft 7r
ow if
ti. r
r
s{
Of rr t I L 7
Lip
kv
it
■ 1 t / ti +F 1 I i -
' 11. r* ail��ll+ 1 y
F � 1
f r d w t 1 I 1 +
Of 1
Iw
1 1 ' '•■
# 1 1 I+ �' t• I I 1
1�4)1
• I � I 1� 1 1
■
1 I
1■ w
�i
''
MP
allso NO
No
4b IMP
OF
I `
■
1 I IL 5 dip
{ I
+ t k * ti 40e
IN d NO Or 1P
lb
owl
+ ►+ } 100
ILr�
�■ �w ;r I r f� / I r
1I'! A f r r,: ■ u.m r� f f
Nn... t Dunn umr -m. rlly,�,,: wmior
ro
■
,
dc
�
low }
I■ i � I
CL
i
t
�t
4i 5
lk Olds
IN 0 over ■ frmp, <* 4V1 AV wmv + dr
% +r +�
a ; #� f f r�t,l� . ■�!r ■`tip` LL ■
tip' r _+f J /� _ _+ + ■R. ■ir
r IMP 4MW i ! i i i I on a IF i i t M l i!! !! i
am. ♦ k
"
, ts
LEM
1 f + I
I 1
?to 1
n 4aw qpm�w
IP
Ode t
raffift
am
1 r
}
r w
y �► 1 IN
Ag� 0000
r
i• _ dw mow
+ k
r , OPP
5.f. !a%.
,�r�� i�f.•■� t I M1 � MEW _rte MW
i E _ ■. i ! tit �� r
■ } t 1 0 ri 1
1 1 r� r� *�.• I
� f �' , r 1 i
+ r N f r A r r ' t : I
' �_ S rR f ` � ` r I �■ 1
I OW + r t o- + ` 1 ` 1
.{ r' r+�
I f
OF 010 .0
IF F
4F 14 • 1 S' 4
ft 7r
ow if
ti. r
r
s{
Of rr t I L 7
Lip
kv
it
■ 1 t / ti +F 1 I i -
' 11. r* ail��ll+ 1 y
F � 1
f r d w t 1 I 1 +
Of 1
Iw
1 1 ' '•■
# 1 1 I+ �' t• I I 1
1�4)1
• I � I 1� 1 1
■
1 I
1■ w
�i
''
MP
allso NO
No
4b IMP
OF
I `
■
1 I IL 5 dip
{ I
+ t k * ti 40e
IN d NO Or 1P
lb
owl
+ ►+ } 100
ILr�
�■ �w ;r I r f� / I r
1I'! A f r r,: ■ u.m r� f f
Nn... t Dunn umr -m. rlly,�,,: wmior
QUEST FOR co II L ACTION DATE: 3 8 9 9
ITEM O.: P�l
Department Approval: Manager Reviewed: Agenda Section
Reports and Recommendations
Item Description: Amending assessment roll, St. Rose of Lima appeal,
City project p -49 15, P- 91w--0 3p P-91-02-57,
Background: Last September, the City Council adopted resolutions
accepting assessment -rolls for the above listed projects* At that time,
assessments were levied against St. Rose of Lima Church for all
frontages in the full amounts recommended a The total amount of the
assessments was being slightly less than $72,000. During the time the
assessment roll was considered, St. Rose -filed a written objection to
the assessment and indicated they would appeal unless the. assessments
were reduced. Subsequent discussions were not able to resolve the
utter, and the assessment roll was adopted as presented.
Later action by attorneys for St. Rose resulted in a formal notice of
assessment appeal being filed with the district court Since that date,
our attorney has be6n negotiating with legal counsel for St. Rose in an
attempt to reach an out of court settlement. A tentative, settlement has
been reached and is presented to the council for its consideration •
Policy objectives: Assessments for the projects were levied in ,
accordance with City of Roseville assessment policy. used on advice
from the city's appraiser and attorney, it appears that the assessments
as proposed originally may exceed the benefit. Accordingly, it is
appropriate to consider possible reductions of the assessment amounts.
Financial implications -0 The a�tta� �Y:�d resolution shows the original
amount of assessment. The proposed settlement figure of 4 7 , 7 5 5 . S 9
reprleser° s a reduction of $24,210.. The attached fact sheet prepared by
public wi Mks staff lists the original assessment amounts for the various
project components and the offer which has been accepted by both sides.
If the council concurs with the recommended settlement, the assessment
for Skillman Avenue r a Municipal State Aid project, will be completely
eliminated, and the assessments for Haml ine Avenue reduced by
appro 1mately $14,000m Reduced assessments will be financed by in-house
Municipal State Aid funds and additional PMP bond funds.
Page 2
Assessment appeal
3/8/93
Staff recommendation es Based on the advice of our attorney and
appraiser, we believe the settlement proposed is reasonable. St. Rose
has agreed to pay approximately $42,,000 in street assessments plus the
$5,773 driveway charge. This figure represents ghat we feel would be
the maximum amount which we could recover through an assessment appeal
trial. Therefore, it appears to he a reasonable settlement.
COX rE ED COUNCIL ACTION i
Adoption of resolution amending assessment roll for three city projects.,
P-89-16, P -1 -03, and P- 9102 -57.
LAW OFFICES OF
]TWIN I. PETERSON PETERSON. BELL, CONVERSE: 8c JENSEN
ROBERT C SELL
WILLA D L, CONVERSE
ST. PAUL OFFICE
ROGER A ANSEN
2150 AMERICAN NATIONAL BAND BUILDING
KURT R WALTHER
101 EAST FIFTH STREET �F
.1WES C ERICKSON `
ST. PAUL, MINkESOTA 65101
DAVID S. ANDERSON
Tl I +I D. NICMRMICK'
TELEPHONE (612) 224 -4703
CAROL A BALOWN
FAX (612) 22M70
ITT S. CROSSMAN
CAROL1NE SELL BECKMAN
SEYfLLE OFFICE
C11MY L DAVS
ZFW NORTH SWELLING AVER SUITE 327
ROSEVIL.LE, MINNESOTA 55113
TELEPHONE (612) $31405
*MAD AOMrnMD N VAOCCO M
FAX (612) $331 -2475
February 23, 1993
Mr. Steve Sarkoz y
City of Roseville
2660 Civic Canter Drive
Roseville, MAN 55113
RE: ASSESSMENT APPEAL, ST . ROSE OF LIMA
Our File No. 1011.97
I/ a zS�s
REPLY TO:
Dear Ste v
Enclosed is a copy-of the Resolution which should be passed by
the City Council agreeing to the settlement of the assessment
appeal of St. Rose of Lima for the sum of $47,755.89.
The City should also pass a resolution levying the assessments at
the agreed upon amounts as to each improvement.
Very t r y urs ,
PETER ON t B
/ap
Enclosure
e
E' E J S
. Bell
j;
Street
Hl ine Avenue
Auditor #5967
Pro f ect - P -STS- 9 9 -16
Sk 1411man Avenue
Auditor #6122
Project P�91 -03
Eldridge llwood
Auditor #6253
Project P�91- 022 57
Hamline parking lane
Auditor #5967
Project F- SW -89 -15
Street
Hemline Avenue
Auditor #5967
Project P #SW�8 9 � 16
Skillman Avenue r
Auditor #6122
Project P�91�03
Hl dridge Del brood
Auditor #5353
Project P -9102 �57
Haml ine parking lane
Auditor #5957
Project PawSWwS9 -16
19.6 *1 X 53x41
548.2 X 48x61
1 X 5,773.19
Total
$24,209.97
$1.0,473.7a
$31,509.00
$5,773 *19
Grand Total : 7 1 v 9 4 5* 8 6
ACCEPTED OFFER
PrQROse-d a
140*3417 X 74x53 =
0 X 53.41
645x2 X 45x61 =
1 5,773 *19 =
Total
$10,473.70
0 * 00 it
$31,509 *00
$5r773*19
ACCEPTED GRAND TOTAL = 47 s 7 5 5.8 9
ZXTRPACT of KINUTEB OF MEETING
OF CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF ROB TOLE
RMSEY COURTT # SoTA
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of th6 city
council of the City of Roseville, Courxty of Ramsey, Minnesota, was duly
held in th City Hall at 2660 civic center Drive, Roseville, Minnesota,
on Monday, the eighth day of March, 1993, at 7 :30 o'clock psmo
The following members were present
and the following were absent
Member introduced the following resolution and moved its
adoption:
RESOLUTION Ro.
RESOLUTION AOIMG ASSESSIMIT8 FOR
1XPR0VV1ENTB P =91 03# -PmS9 -16.r and P#91- 02-57
WHEREAS, the city of Roseville constructed local street improvements
P�9 103 and P -9 1 :02157, and Ramsey county constructed Hamline Avenue
improvement Pe*89 -161
wHEREAS on September 28l 19920 the City of Roseville levied assessments
to all benefited property owners and assessed the parcel owned by the
Church of Sto Rose of Lima as follows
P oJect P�89 16 29, 983 o 16
Project P1 103 1O,473e7O
Project Pi91-02-57 al-W-509 a 00
$71.j965e86
WHEREAS on October 2 , 19 9 , the Church of St* Rose of Liana filed an
appeal of the assessment with the Ramsey county District Court$
WHEREASg the P arties have now agreed that the above matter should be
settled as follows:
The city Attorney is hereby instructed to file the appropriate
1 y y
Stipulation of Dismissal with the Ramsey county District court
dismissing the assessment appeal of St. Ross of Lima churche The
City ouncil will pass a resolution and certify a new assessment to
Y
Ramsey county, assessing this property a s follows
Project P -89-16 $16,246.89
Pro3 ect P- 91103 0000
Project P�91�0 �57 21,9592
$47,755.89
NOW THEREFORE v IT 1S RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Roseville. that the assessment appeal of the Church of St. Rose of Lima
is settled and the City Attorney is hereby authorized and directed to
file an appropriate Stipulation of Dismissal dismissing said assessment
appeal*
The notion for the adoption of the, foregoing resolution was duly
seconded by Councilmember and upon vote being taken thereon,, the
following voted in favor thereof*
and the following voted against the same:
Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
i
COUNTY OF RAMSEY ) SS
CITY OF ROSEVILLE }
It the undersigned, being the duly qualified City Manager of the
City of Roseville , County of Ramsey, state of Minnesota, do hereby
attached and foregoing
certify that I have carefully compared the a g g
extract of minutes of a - regular- meeting of said City Council held on
the Sth day of March, 1993, with the original thereof on file in m
office and the same is a full, true, and complete transcript insofar as
the same relates to improvements P- 89 :16j P :911031 and PaP91- 02�57a
Adopted by the council this eth day of March,,' 1993a
E A L
City Manager
REQUEST FOR CODNCIL ACTI0N DATE: 3/8/93
ITEM K0; : I , T
Department Approval: Manager Reviewed* Agenda Section:
Reports and Recommendations
item ascription: Amending assessment Droll for Terrace Drive
improvement, for former Lincoln Development
parcels, city project 92-04
Background: Last fall, the city council adopted an assessment roll for
improvements to Terrace Drive from Lincoln Drive westerly to the cul -de-
sac, connecting with.the existing Terrace Drive at the ditch.
Assessments were levied against all benefiting properties consistent
with past city assessment policy. Municipal State Aid funds were also
available to supplement the project financings
Prior to constructing the improvement, when the public improvement
hearing phase was being considered by the council, I received a request
from Lincoln Development for consideration for a possible assessment
reduction. This was based on the fact that they previously constructed
the segment of Terrace Drive from Lincoln westerly to provide access for
the Edina Realty building and shopping center. Since this segment of
road would have to be removed and reconstructed to facilitate the city
project,-they felt they should receive gone credit for past
construction.
1 agreed in concept with the request and agreed to reduce their
assessment upon receipt of a written request at the time the project
assessment hearing were held. Unfortunately, at the time- .the project
was assessed last fall, owners of the Rosedale Square Forth Shopping
Center property and office building were in bankruptcy proceedings.
Since no written request came from the property owners at that time, we
proceeded with an assessment against all parcels in the -full amount
consistent with the city assessment policy*
We have now received a letter from the bank that now owns title to the
former Rosedale Square North property including the retail center and
office building. The letter, a copy of which is attached, requests the
reduction of the assessed amounts consistent with past agreements I had
with the former owner. The request would be to reduce the assessments
against the property by approximately 60% from $126,000 to 5 3, 5 0 0.
Policy objectives* The-request from Norwest Bank is consistent with
past written agreements between my office and the former shopping center
ownerse Because the property was in bankruptcy proceeding, the request
was not fo rm ally made in writing from the property owners. The
assessment was levied as originally recommended. Had the request been
made during the assessment proceedings, it would have been reasonable
Page 2
Terrace Drive
3/8/93
and consistent, since there would have been a reduced benefit from the
Terrace Drive project accruing to the Rosedale Square North parcels.
They had previously paid the full cost for the old Terrace Drive
constructions The request now seems reasonable and consistent with
past assessment policy and practice in similar situations;
Financial implicationsoo As noted in the letter from Norwest, the
request is to reduce the assessment from $125,961.91 to $53,526.73, or a
reduction of $
The project has adequate funding due to Municipal State Aid funds -being
applied to the project. In fact, the project is "over financed since
special assessments and Municipal State Aid funds were used to the
maximum extent allowed by state aid rules and assessment policy.
Therefore, the reduction requested can be made without adversely
affecting project financing
Staff recommendation: staff believes
Bank is reasonable. We were prepared
if it Mould have been made by Lincoln
Rosedale Square forth,, used upon ou'.
the project has adequate financing to
recommend that the Norwest request be
RECODMNDED COUNCIL ACTION*
that the request made by Norwest
to honor a similar request earlier
Development,- former owner of
r past commitment and the fact than
allow the request to be made, we
honored
Adoption of a resolution amending the assessment roll for city project
P -91 -04 reducing the total assessment from $125,96le9l to $53,526.73.
RECENED FEB 31993
Nommst Bank Minnesota, N.A.
Norwest Canter
BANKS HOW Sixth and Marquette
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55479-0001
6121667 -1234
February 4,1 GG3
Mr. 'Steven D. Gatlin
Public Works Director
City of Roseville
2660 Civic center Drive
Roseville* NON 65 113-1899
Re: City of Roseville Special Assessments, City Project 91-04, terrace Drive
Construction
Dear Mr. Gatlin:
As you know Norwest Bank Minnesota, N.A. recently took title to the property known as
Rosedale Square North which Includes both a retail center and an office building located
on the following tax parcels:
Retail Center: 04-29-23-41-0025
04-29-23-41-0026
Office Building: 04-29-23-41-0023
04-29-23-41-0024
During the foreclosure perlod It came to the bank's attention that there were several
unresolved issues regarding both special assessments and easements affecting three of
the four properties (parcel 26 was not involved). Unfortunately, since the bank Was not ire
tale, there was nothing that it could do regarding those Issues. This Is no longer the case
now that the foreclosure period is over and the bank owns the properties.
A� to the special assessments, k Is our understanding that $125,961.91 was assessed
against parcels 23,24, and 25 In conf unction with the construction of Terrace Drive and
related storm sewer work. in your letter of February 1, 1993 you indicated that you had
previously agreed on a discount of these assessments with the previous owner, Rosedale
Square North Lim tbd Partnership} since the above referenced parcels received only
reduced benefits from the Improvements. Unfortunately tmt agreement was never
formalized to the partnership filing bankruptcy and the properties were assessed for their
full share of the Improvement costs. At this time Norwest asks that the cry of Roseville
amend the assessment rolls as follows which Is In line with the prior agreement:
Parcel
Street
storm
Total
04-29-23 -41X23
13,865,70
$1,794.17
$159659.87
04-29-23-41-0024
$1 3,533.72
$547.62
$14,1 81.24
04-29-23-41-0025
$19,935140
$31-750.22
$23,685.62
Total
$533o526.73
Old Assessment
125}961.91
Mr. Steven D. C afflin
February 4, 1993
Page
The other outstanding issue Is the payment to Norwes't by the City for temporary and
permanent easements associated with the construction of Terra6e Drive. According to our
records the City had previously proposed to pay $3,1 85.00 for these easements. While
Nor west does not have all of the documentation associated with the easements, Including
the final survey, it Is the bank's understanding that this amount was acceptable to the prior
per but again was not formalized due to the bankruptcy. since the former owner found
the amount and terms acceptable it is most probable that Norwest would also but we
would appreciate reoeiving copies of the appropriate documents so that an Informed
decision can be robe,
It is Norwest's desire to resolve nth of these Issues as quickly as possible and to that end
your past and future assistance and operation is very much appreciated. if you have
any questions or creed any additional Information please feet free to call me at 667 -0539.
Again, thank you for your help on these matters.
Sincerely,
Oe
Gary M. Lechko
Vice President
REFLKLIVUL rub'' rutq>r.* Arvu I iic ioVury
TY IS NOT NIBL E FOR ANY IN-
ACCURACIES HEREIN CONTAINED ,
REQUEST FOR COQNCIL ACTION DATE: 3/8/93
ITEM No * ■ r
Department 4pp]joval: Manager Reviewed@ Agenda siction:
C: �)F 6
Reports and Recommendations
item Description: Approval of change order 1A, 2, and 3 and final
contract acceptance, Public Works Garage /Water Booster
Station re- roofing, city Project M-92-22
Background: city proj
Page 2
M -9222
3/8/93
A summary of complete project financing is provided as follows:
original contract amount 115j950
Water booster station 33, o0
Public works garage ]wilding 828750
Change order No. 1 3 0, 2 7 o
(rev--roofing of Fire station No. 3 )
Change order No. 1A 5v017
(provision of an additional expansion joint for
Fire Station No. 3 roof and extra mobilization
costs for emergency work to complete the work
prior to inclement weather)
Change order No.' 2 11433.80
(roof scuppers for public works garage)
Change order No. 3 446.16
(emergency patching for city license bureau roof
TOTAL $153,123#96
Staff recommendation: A detailed description of the change order for
the fire station roof is attached in a letter from TNDA. In reviewing
the charge order, we feel the request from the contractor as described
by the architect is reasonable and recommend that Change order 1A be
approved in the amount of ,017e Also, charge Order 2, the provision
of the roof scuppers, was necessary to provide proper drainage for the
pub i i c works garage roof. change order 3 was required to make emergency
repair to the license bureau roof, so it could last through the ,19
1993 winter season. Future consideration will have to be given to re-
roofing the license bureau.
Staff recommends the council approve change orders 1A# 2, and 3 for
project M-92- 22, accept the project, and authorize final payment. The
total amount of all contract work, including the original contract and
all four change orders, will be $153,123.96. For council review, we
have attached a copy of changes orders 1A, 2, and 3 along with our
project summa r sheet i
COMNEMDED COUNCIL ACTION*
■
Adoption of resolution approving change orders 1A, 2, and 3 for City
Project No-92-22 and accepting work completed under said project and
authorizing final payment to McPhillips Brothers Roofing, Inc .
PROJECT INFORMATION
FiTNiumber/Name:
City Project M4242, Re�roofinr
Location: water booster station, public w. orkv,
public buildings
era , Fire Station #3
IDescription:
Roof repair /replacement
r�47Engiheer's
Estimated Cost
1109000.00
Means of Financing
SOURCE
AMOUNT
Utility Funds
Ph sioal, Plant Fund
69396-16
Op�rating Budget
1 46,727.8o
TOTAL:
153,123.96
Awarded Contract Amount
.11 5,950 -00
7
IChange orders l l M
AMOU I
TOTAL TO DATE
1. Re ,-roof Fire Station
3012 .,0
1 A� Expansion joint, extra moRization 1.,
5,017.00
2. Expansion + int for PW garage
1,433.80 .
3. Lioense bureau roof repair
446.16
37,173.96
8
tatU cheer � " 1100% COM fete
Pai date
$, .
Amount due
, 687.96
Total paid
1 53 }1 23,96
ProjectCouncil Action (Resolution) Checklist
DATE COMPLETED
y stud
Receiving petition, ordering feasibilit
Receiving feasi.bilitf study, scheduling improvement hearing_
,Ordering
improvement, ordering Preparation of Ejanstapecs
Approving lanafspeoifioa #ions, authorizing ad for bids
618192
Awarding bid, authorizin contract execution
7113/92
Approving change order #1, Fire Station #3 re -roof
1112319
Approving change orders #1 A, #2, and #3
3/8/93
Accepting Acceptipg work, authorizing final payment
Approving final project costs, authorizing pre ration of assessment roll
Accepting assessment roll, scheduling assessment hearin
Adopting assessment roll
TIMA TOLTZ* KING. DUVALL, ANDERSON
AND ASSOCIATES, INC04PORATED
on r
4
ENGINEERS ARCHITECTS PLANNERS Ism MEWMA T ER
AR STf1EET
TIT PAUL. MNNESMA 53101 -2140
P# E:G1 42-44= 'PAk:612 "24033
January 29, 1993
W. Steve Galin
Public works Director
City of Roseville -
2660 Civic Center Drive
Roseville, MT 55113
Re: Reroofing of Public Works and Booster Station
- Change Order No. lei - Fite Station #3
- Change Order No. 2 - Public works Roof
- Change Order No. 3 - Roof Patching of License Bureau
TKDA Comm. loo. 10149
Mar Steve:
We have received f corn McPhillips Roofing and are forwarding to you bps for the above -
referenced project.
Change Order No. is fox adding an expansion ,point and reflashing the joint between high and
low roof at the Public works Facility.
The work of patching the License Bureau was .done as requested, is outside of the contract with
McPhillips, is acceptable and should be paid.
The work on the Fire Station #3 is complete and the Application for Payment is enclosed with its
sun ary sheet. Please note that the cost to McFhihips was $5,017 above the Not to Exceed
amount of the C.0. The basis for McPhillips' proposal for this work was based upon our walk-
through with Joe Hewett. It was not based upon drawings which due to tuning were prepared
afterward. In the course of the existing construction document review and the p aration of
TKDA's construction docurnent, it became clear that an expansion joint was required on the east
d west walls which am load. bearin to take up the put t` l structural movement. The
an � �
incorporation of the expansion j
Mr. Steve Gatlin
January 2, 1993
Page Two
We wish to note that Mcphi ll s is not forcing the issue and demanding an " ", but in our
o 4* the work was dom in good faith, and quickly to keep the building dry. We have
mcluded Change Order KA to cover theme additi al costs. As you noticed, in the past, I have
always reviewed Contractor changes with the City's -best interest in rind and have refused those
I felt were unarm table. In this particular cam, I feel that McPhillips should be paid the
additional costs they iocun -ed on behalf of the City. Should the City, desire it, I am willing to
revww the situation, that resulted n ts increase ,with them.
sinar6y yours,
1006IJ04e000til
Peter M. Brazek, AIA
Project Manager
.)
Encl.
ANGE
OWNER
�C
ORDER
ARCHITECT
CONTRACTOR
❑
❑
FIELD
❑
AIA DOCUMENT G701
OTHER
❑
PROJECT: City of Pmeville CHANGE ORDER NUMBER: 1A
(nam, 2d�dr 5) f inn of Public Works Fac & ATE. . I— r 3
2 8/9 Booster ivic ante` ,
TO CONTRACTOR: Ptseville , M 55113 ARCHITECT'S PROJECT NO: 10149
(nmne, addr) CONTRACT SATE: Sul �, �1��
l+�lips Bros, ' Roof ing * ITYc .
2590 �teLii�� -�-.4 #r a CONTRACT FOR: Ming
St. Paul F M 55109
The Contract is changed as follows:
d to CharIge order No. 1 for a reroofing of Fire Station #3:
um joints to east and West paLrapet walls $1 r 500
AAd for use of tional crews due to existing mmbrane
lfideStl"uctim and due to Bathe' . 31517
9W 4 5x017,00
Not valid until signed by the Owner, ArchiteW and nb*Mor.
Then (Conti tSum) ( TY ..r.r... ..,,,....rr. r.. 115r950100
Net change by p1 eT io m o d Ch=W Orders . a . . ■ ■ . . . ■ . ■ ■ ■ • . . a . a . . . . ■ ■ . . . • . S 32 r 156 m 96
The (Contract Sure) (Gtomm prior to th Change Order was .. a r ..... , S 14 8 P 106.96
� be )( V
The (Contract Sum) (6 Change J � ��j the t bra
• by his Change Order in Lice �Lii } of . r . a ■ . . a ■ ■ . . • r r r . . . . . . . , ■ � 5,017,e
The new (Contract Sum) � �ie� this QI~ Oar wiH be , . S
( '"'''! b� days.
The Contract Time will b � � �
The d2te of SuhmntW Completion2s of the date of Chmigc Order therefore is Decenter 27, 1992
NOTE: This smnl2ry does not refleet charm ki the Ctantma Sum, Contract Time or Guaranteed M2xlmum Price which have been authorized by
Can,strucuon Change Dwmtive.
S . R)OFIM nr e
CONTRACTOR
2590 12L1
Addrm
BY
CITY OF F40SEVI=
OWNER
266 Civic Center Dr.
Adder
BY
DATE DATE
CIA cor QM 0 CHANGE ORDER 0 1997 EDITION '■ AI k* ■ Q 1987 a THE G I . I 7
AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS, 1135 NERW YORK AVE,, N.V., WASHNGTDN, D.C, 2
City of ROSeville CAGE ORDER NUMBER:
n ,c, add) parmfing of Public Mrks Fac f& 3./28/93
'�DATa
Booster Sta, 660 ivlc f
.10149
T
CONTRACTOR: ��11 M 55113 ARCHITECT• PROJECT ISO.
(namc, 2ddc) CONTRACT' DAVE: � �� � 1�5 �
I�hi11ips f � � �
2590 dal, Dr. CONTRACT FOR-. ftrMfing
. Paul, M 55109
Mbe Con=ct is changed 2S MOWS:
TO an expansim joint ref lash the roof at the J oin the high and
low x fs of the Pub lip Works Fatty 0
AM $ll433*80
Not valid undl 819n9d bY the OwFw, Archftd and r.
The originW (ntr= Sump ( 30r277,00
Net �ge by pmvioL�sly authorized amp Orden ! ! 4 L ■ ■ ■ ■ a ! i ■ ■ a *1 a ! i ■ a a a ■ ■ ■ i ■ ■ ■ • S 146p;27,00
The (Cbntr2ct SUM) ( P
The (Contr= Sure X11 be (■ 1 4 3 A0
9 ohm by O f i ft mnow of * ■ ■ . . a ■ ■ ■ i F A + r r ■ ■ ■ I � ■ ■ ro„ < }: n ia aim ;A„ f
Order wit be . S 147 F 660 * $0
The new ( ntrw Sum) ( Cix�rtge
' by )days-
The Contma T`im 7 Ir 1992
7b a date of SubsuntW Cou*kt�on w of tt� ate of t � Order t1 o
NOTE:
This erect chwqp in dt e Comma Sume CxmwAM Time or Guamteed Maxffnunn Prwe which have been anhor=d by
CbxW M=five.
.. 1 • of4
ARCHrrECT • 2 590 2650 Civic qtr Dr.
1500 ri r � Address . Aadrm -
� Addr .
55109 nosedll 55113,gr A-
P
ai
erpol
BY BY BY
DATE DATE DATE p'-- 7.07
ozI ! l i AIA* t
AIA �� �G =1�i987
AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHrMCTS, 1735 NEW YORK AVL, N.W., WASHINGTON, D.C. 20006
OVMR
...�ANGE
ORDER
Axcwncr
CoNTMCTOR
jK
FIELD
AIA DOCUMENT G701
OTHER
City of ROSeville CAGE ORDER NUMBER:
n ,c, add) parmfing of Public Mrks Fac f& 3./28/93
'�DATa
Booster Sta, 660 ivlc f
.10149
T
CONTRACTOR: ��11 M 55113 ARCHITECT• PROJECT ISO.
(namc, 2ddc) CONTRACT' DAVE: � �� � 1�5 �
I�hi11ips f � � �
2590 dal, Dr. CONTRACT FOR-. ftrMfing
. Paul, M 55109
Mbe Con=ct is changed 2S MOWS:
TO an expansim joint ref lash the roof at the J oin the high and
low x fs of the Pub lip Works Fatty 0
AM $ll433*80
Not valid undl 819n9d bY the OwFw, Archftd and r.
The originW (ntr= Sump ( 30r277,00
Net �ge by pmvioL�sly authorized amp Orden ! ! 4 L ■ ■ ■ ■ a ! i ■ ■ a *1 a ! i ■ a a a ■ ■ ■ i ■ ■ ■ • S 146p;27,00
The (Cbntr2ct SUM) ( P
The (Contr= Sure X11 be (■ 1 4 3 A0
9 ohm by O f i ft mnow of * ■ ■ . . a ■ ■ ■ i F A + r r ■ ■ ■ I � ■ ■ ro„ < }: n ia aim ;A„ f
Order wit be . S 147 F 660 * $0
The new ( ntrw Sum) ( Cix�rtge
' by )days-
The Contma T`im 7 Ir 1992
7b a date of SubsuntW Cou*kt�on w of tt� ate of t � Order t1 o
NOTE:
This erect chwqp in dt e Comma Sume CxmwAM Time or Guamteed Maxffnunn Prwe which have been anhor=d by
CbxW M=five.
.. 1 • of4
ARCHrrECT • 2 590 2650 Civic qtr Dr.
1500 ri r � Address . Aadrm -
� Addr .
55109 nosedll 55113,gr A-
P
ai
erpol
BY BY BY
DATE DATE DATE p'-- 7.07
ozI ! l i AIA* t
AIA �� �G =1�i987
AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHrMCTS, 1735 NEW YORK AVL, N.W., WASHINGTON, D.C. 20006
CHANGE
OWNER
ARCHITECT
°❑
ORDER
TOR
FIELD
❑
AIA DOCUMENT G701
OTHER
❑
PROJECT-. city of Roseville CHANGE ORDER NUMBER: 3
(name, address) PWWfing of Public Wbrks -Far. . ATE: 1/29/93
Booster Sta* 2660 Civic Center l�
TO
CONTRACTOR: mil , M .55113 AR HITECT'PS PROJECT N06 10149
nme } address 1r� f CONTRACT' DATE: July 0 19 9
I�lljPs Bros. r�
f�g , Inc.
2590 mial CONTRACT FOR: Rerc&iM
t. Paul, IAN 55109
The Contract is changed as follows:
At the
t of the Nm r , McPhil:Lips Bros Roofing did patching work
on the I &cense Bureau (old City 1)
Fill I k O
Not valid antil signed by the Ownsr, Architect and Contractor.
The ofiginal (COnt 2 SUM r 4 y a . . ■ r . . • ■ ■ •
i a r ■ . . ■ s
Net change by previously authorized Chwige Orden r . ■ . ■ ■ . . . ■ . . . ■ . . . . i • • • ■ ■ • i i r r ■ ■
The (Contr2a Sum) � -eel Pnor to this Ch�r�c order ...... , ... �
The (CcntrAM Sum) (0===Ct ) wZ be Q )
bythis Change Order in ai ant of . . . ■ . . r . • . . ■ . a r . . . . . . r r . . S
The new (ntrt Sum) tt �e order gill be . r
The Cont t Time mill be a � � by
The date of Substantial CcmPletdOn as Of the date Of this CtLT Order therebre is
115,950 m 00
31, 710.80
147 r 660 a 80
446e16-
148,106e 96
( 0 days-
e 27, 1992
NOTE: This does not r fim charqp in the Cxama Surn, Cmft= Time or Guarmteed M annum Prig whic=h have been authorized by
nmetion ChmW Directim
ARCHITECT ONTRACTOR OWNER
ial
1 Son i rF iter Mr - - - Ad�r
Adder Add
St MST 55101-214- st. Paul f M 55109 Roseville , ly
//are(
BY BY
BY
DA'V'E DATE DATE UM1 • CHI' GE ORDER ; 1987 IEDMON # A1A* Q 1987 THE Gi l �1 987
AMER CAN INSTIT = OF ARCHI'I"EUS, 1735 NEW YORK AVE., N.W., WASMGTON, D.C. 20006
RECEpiE� S'f fl 2 3 19�i
TKDA T01.TZt KING. DUVALL, ANDERSON
AND ASS001ATES, INCORPORATED
ENGINEERS ARCHITECTS PLANNERS 15M MERITOR TOWER
CEDAR 5 1 ET
8NNT PAUL, MINNERMA 551 01-2140
IIHMEAMM-WO FAX012ANG4MU
Febmary 19, 1993
W. Steve Gatlin
Public Works Direaor
City of Roseville
2660 Civic Center Drive
Roseville, MN 55113
Re: Reroofing of Public Work and Booster Station
Roseville, Minnesota
T INA Conun. No. 10149
Dear Steve
We are enclosing Certificate for Payment No. 3 in the amount of $37,387.10 issued to McP ips
Bros. Roofing Co. for work completed on the referenced project. This is being sent t.o you for
processing and payment. Please forward the blue copy with the Contractor's payment.
Also enclosed am items listed in order that fmal payment may be processed:
Withholding Affidavit for Contractors - Form 1C -134
Contractor's Affidavit of Payment of Debts and Claims -
ontractor's Affidavit of Release of Liens
Consent of Surety Company to Final Faint.
Sincerely,
Peter M. Brook,
. � l
Encls.
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
Department Approval:
Nana er Reviewed:
DATE: 3/08/93
r
ITEM NO _
Agenda Section:
Reports and Recommendations
Item Description* Approval of Fire Relief pension Increase*
Backaround
At the City Council meeting of February 22f _1993, the proposed Fire
Relief pension increase was discussed. Revisions of the conditional
language were to be discussed between Roger Jensen of our City
Attorney's office and the Fire Relief Pension Board.
Formal city Council action was taken to continue this item to the March
B, 1993 City Council meeting.
At the time of agenda preparation, we have had no contact with the Firs
Relief Association. Roger Jensen has attempted to contact David
Arnold, Attorney for the Fire Relief Pension Board (see attached letter
dated March 1, 1993), e anticipate receiving something from the Fire
Relief Pension Association prior to the City Council meeting for City
council consideration.
Financial I=l ications
The cost of the Fire pension increase is outlined in the attached
memorandum from Finance Director Ed Burrell, dated February 3.9, .1993.0
The funds needed for the pension increase would be budgeted in Fiscal
Year 1994.
COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED:
Ir
Notion approving the increase in the Fire pension benefit as outlined
in the attached resolution.
LAW OFFICES OF
ERMN a PETERSON PETERSON, BELL, CONVERSE & J
ROBERT C BELL I
I
M& LARD t. CONVERSE S
ST. PAUL OFFICE
ROGER A JENSEN 2
2100 AMERICAN NATIONAL BANK BUILDING
KURT F WALTFER 1
1 D1 EAST FIFTH STREET
JAMES CL ERICKSONO S
ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55101
DAVID & ANDERSON T
TELEPHONE (512) 224-4
CAROL & BALD N
FAX (612) 22M70
I I B` C �
�1�1 L
LSE OFFICE
Larch 1, 1993
Mr. David Arnold
ARNOLD & McDOWELL
Attorneys at Law
5881 Cedar Lake Road
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55416 --1492
3 •r
1 93 :f
REPLY TO:
St . Paul
Re: Roseville Firefighter's Relief Association
Our File No. 101119
Dear David:
I have left at least three messages with you to return my calls
since Tuesday, February 23. I also faxed you a copy of proposed
changes in the resolution we have previously discussed.,
I would appreciate your contacting me at your earliest
convenience regarding those proposed changes in the resolution
language.
RAJ /end
Steve Sarozy
Yours very trulyr
PETERSON j BELL j CONVERSE & JENS EN
!S! ROGER A. JENSEN
Roger A. Jensen
February 19, 1993
To: Steve Sarkoz
C i ter imager
From Ed Burnell 1//
Finance Director
Fire Relief Bmefftn Est to City
The proposed increases are as follows:
monthly B erne f it
Per 2.f service
1993 $17e5O
1994 $20.00
will have estimated costs to the City as follows
1994 $1191000
1995 $116 #000
The estimated amounts could change depending on the actuarial -
makeup of the group as to age and years of service.
In addition, the amount in 1996 and beyond will depend upon how
well the Board' s investments do with respect to decreasing the
unfunded liahil i ty a Current projections would indicate no un-
funded liability by 19969
There are no costs for 1993, since the actuarial calculation will
take place for the 1994 budget year.
Please let us know if you need additional information .
REQUEST FOR COIINC2L ACT ON DATE: 3/8/93
ITEM NO a: H ..]
Department A proval: Manager Reviewed: Agenda Section:
C'"Ordinances and Resolutions
item escriptiont Resolution receiving petition and ordering
preparation of a feasibility study for public
improvements within the rightiof -way for Lincoln
Drive from County Road c "&2 to Lydia Avenue
Background: on March 10. 19 9 3 , staff received a petition from developers
for the proposed Paul t s Place renovation project. They have submitted a
public improvement petition requesting construction of public
improvements for Lincoln give from county Road C-2 to Lydia Avenue.
The proposed improvements include the construction of a roadway with
.paving and concrete curb and gutter, and installation of necessary
utilities to sera the development including waterma in, sanitary sewer,
and stogy--m surer. The developers are asking that the feasibility study
be prepared and a public improvement hearing be held to determine
whether the project should proceed. At this point, the developers are
requesting that the city construct the improvements and assess the
cost against the benefiting{propert. A map showing the proposed
improve ants is attached
Three years ago the - council considered the extension of Lincoln Drive
tat time
north of Terrace Drive. The segment under consideration at h
included the portion of Lincoln between Terrace Drive and county Road
C�2 and County Road Cow2 from Lincoln to Snelling. No serious
consideration was given for extension of Lincoln north of County Road
C- 2e At that time the council chose not to ore. :r the project primarily
because of concerns expressed by proper-*--*,? owne } along the segment of
proposed Lincoln Avenue south of County Road C--2 also owning property on
the Snelling Avenue Frontage Roads The council expressed an interest in
proceeding with the entire project in the future at such time as the
Paul's Place redevelopment moved ahead.
Since that project is now seriously being considered, it seems
appropriate to consider the extension of Lincoln give along the entire
incomplete section from Terrace give to County Road C-2 and from county
Road Ca-2 to Lydia Avenue. Also, to complete the project, it will be
necessary to reconstruct county Road C-2 between Snelling and Lincoln
including signal modifications at the intersection of county Road C -2
and Snelling.
When the the Lincoln give extension was considered. previously, many of
the d.egign issues were addressed at that times These eluded roadway
alignment and widthr utility locations, necessary stor.r sewer, and other
o
engineering issues+ A complete feasibility report should no t take a
great deal of additional engineering efforts
Page 2
Lincoln Drive
3/8/93
policy actives: Normally, by city p6lic , developers'can request the
installation of public improvements to serve their project ,
in � consistent stent with cat
improvement costs assessed against their property +y
se since the roadway involves Municipal
assessment policies, In this case, .
financing and financial participation from MnDOT r it is .
State Aid fin �
that the city construct the improvement and use all available
suggested F ■
outside funding sources to assist in project f financing
It has also been past city policy
as a single prof ect r if possible,
owners a For this reason, it maei
Drive segment between Terrace and
reconstruction-of County Road -2
project*
to complete major roadway construction
to minimize impact to abutting property
s sense to consider the entire Lincoln
Lydia and also the extension and
from Lincoln to Snelling as a single
Financial impli eat ions a The feasibility report will analyze the project
in deter �.1
and cost estimates will be prepared for all components of the
project g
'ncludin roadway constructions utility construction, and
required drainage a facilitiese Landscaping elements may be considered as
�
part of the project consistent with past landscaping done on Terrace.
project is ordered following a public hearings it could be
1 f the pr a
constructed in late 1993 and completed in 1994 as a phased project.
supplemental project ect financing will be available from Municipal State
' �
Aid sources, KnDCT based on past commitments a and city utility fundso
staff r$commendation: Staff recommends that aL feasibility study
addressing the overall improvement be prepared at thisitirae# e
st that the project should happen as a single project and
strongly suggest p 7
and constructed b the city because of past agreements with
be designed .
financing d reconstruction of County Road -20 The'newly
nDOT for f g an
constructed Lincoln Drive will replace the old Snelling Avenue Frontage
Road and dealing
with MnDOT will be an important issue as-it relates to
alignment and financing.
We have discussed the project with the developer, and they have
indicated a schedule need to have a roadway available by fall of 1993.
•i a
This is feasible, and the protect could be staged for completion in
1994a A map showing the overall project location is attached.
1 COMMNDED COUNCIL ACTION 62
Approval of resolution receiving petition and ordering preparation
of
a
feasibility report for public improvements to Lincoln Drive f r om Count y
Road C- 2 to Lydia, Lincoln Drive from Terrace 'Dr i ye to Count y road
C-2, an y d Count Road C- from Lincoln Drive to Snelling Avenue
fw%n the City Cc',..Incil of the City of R09eville f
We. the undersigned, owners of not l e s e theme property
the following descrIptionF hereby petition. that said area e improved as
follows: ERW TO S13 XMROVM
See attached dauc ript ion & sketch
AREA OF IMPROVMMNT
Tho public. right-of-way for
relocated Lincoln Drive from Ccuuty Road C2 to Vydis Ave.
ToS OF MPROVEMENT
gra in Curb & Gutter, water mAiin, Uni"ry sewer and Storm sewer
��
pursuant t
lawf of Minnesota Statues Crhapter 429
IMME ADDRESS O p
APb
-.
4e
46
3003 Snelling Avenue Norths St., Paul 631-510
i t form and t o be signed by the
E�i reed , the ck d o and f ouna to be � p
requircd number 2 �e "'s n property affected b the making of t he
improvem9ut petitioned for* ,
.Date Received -. go"- 3 � lw cl? Checked by
(over)
South CaMPUS
losevillef MN ..
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
PARCEL i * Plot Three. 0
7 and SR Block 6} Faire► welht
1W
PARCEL feet of the outheost Quarter of the
f the � �� th � feet of the East ��� F . ,
North 350 feet o h l�o� � � feet, avo�r���� to the �
Northeost Quarter of Section 4, Township 9 North, �
Government Survey thereof..
PARCEL 3: f the Northeost QUorter
East ��� feet �f the South Quarter o
North 633 feet of the OStL 225 feet of the North
hi North, Rome Idlest, except the feet
of e�tIo� �, Township he eat ��� feet of the �a�t ���
f ona except the North 154 feet of t
1�� feet thereof, Survey thereof.
f according to the U.S. overnrne n t
thereof. �
IF
PARCEL except the Westerly 40 feet thereof,
West 7 5 feet of the East 500 feet, e R
North � � feet of the e�
• f eotlo 41 Township 219 lNorth, loo g
r er of the Northeost �n the ar�tl�evet ��a h t ouorter o r� t .
West, . * Ga ernrnen t Survey thereof
� e�t� according to the U
PARCEL
uo r er of the Northeast Varte
r of Section 41 Township 29
r
No,
EEst 500 fee l of the Southeast d633 feet t hereof , and eoePt the South 533 feet thereof
Ronge 23 West, except the North
�
according
to the U.S. Government Survey thereof*
L
P ARC EL t ��rreet
Lots 11 o
rid Block , Fairview Heights Plot
PARCEL 7= feet of the Eost feet of the
North 154 feet of the lest West,
The Westerly �� feet of the r, � ��w��h�r � North, Range
f he Northeost Qty arter of echo �
�o�the��t ���rter o �
according to
the U.S,, Government Survey thereof,
F,
EXISTING UTILITIES'
.. /1TC11A � r
EXHIBIT 4;
k + l *% %b
f4 A
" ` J 0 Ilk
F
mom e�
not
CIP WATER 811 VCP SANITARY
Lam_
xa m m u m
iiMEME■EAiiyii�REiEI IEEifitEEiEEii1 E121E1} EEI E i all 4
N
12 9 10 i (7 6;4D�
w (15) (14 ■ bly
* X� 1 T I
VA
lop
3
it P
17
1 1
IL
m
pm
SITE
t *
or
0 , rl
(L.-f +) LYS ;Y1,
%6 fim 1 I J 3 r1
(43
14 in
1, w�
i �S' � � � � ����� � ■ ■L� »'.i�r�atirr+ � rte. --r - r- + ■ .
+ r
IF •
� � s
i % *1 -,
rr'
, f D ?
f
- -+ ilk i r . Z, 0.+ .
a +
14 3
LAL
'Lor
.� 2.91
118
44. JI
io 215
Ip a
13
pi �y
. RO''� ;
1
1
01
Nr
a�
�r
r
i
r
f
ill
IE
; R
IR
f- is Rep
15
pit 1
a
CIP WP TER
i LIFT STATION
*--- V RCP
STORM
SEWER/
NORTH
�`�
P FRET SANITARY
}
w
f
CITY RED C2 t ..On
Fr
i4t%�Jmj ■ 1+ a r ,
Jures. *O%N ►;Wq
flergti Second �+�r��t � IM1�fin���o�� *. w��nn�se�a
Ills. !P■W TNb �Ir■�r - ins
SOUTH�
so am-n
ROSEVLLEs Mill
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: 03-08a-93
ITEM NO * # P -
Department Approval: Manager Reviewed* Agenda Section
Resolution
Item Description* Resolutions community Development Bloc}
Grants.
Bac around:
in Ramsey County has accepted applications for review for the
fiscal year 1993 CDBG funds. 33 projects have been submitted
for Counter review totalling approximately $3,1 million. The
County has approximately 1.5 million - in funds to allocate,
2* Three projects effecting Roseville have been submitted.
An Request for $250,000 of CDBG funds to help pay for - s its
acquisition and clearance costs for the Rice creek
Crossings project to be developed by College Properties
on the former Paul's place site
B $41,493 is being requested by Northwest counseling
Center, a division o f Northwest Youth and Family-
Se rV i ce s , to support the. mental health programs offered
by this agency.
c . $19,598 is being requested by Northwest Youth and Family
Services to help fund the Young Fathers Project.
3 It is required that resolutions - supporting the projects be
developed to attach to the aforementioned projects before
action by Ramsey County. The appropriate resolutions are
attached.
to f f . Rec ommendat i
in Staff recommends approval of all three projects.
Council Act .,n Bg=ested:
l . Motion to approve resolution supporting Rosevil le' s request
for community Development Block Grant funding for the Rice
Creek crossings pro l ect .
2. Motion to approve resolution - supporting Northwest counseling
Centers request for Community Development Block Grant
funding
3 . Motion to approve Northwest Youth and Family Services request,
community Development Block Grant funding for the Young,
Fathers Projects
� o act sc iR -ions f_
14, Rice Creek Ckop.Minas Pro! ect
Roseville, in conjunction with College Properties, lnc., is
requesting $250v000 of CDBG funds to help pay for site
acquisition and clearance costs. The total project cost is
approximately $20,9851528 while the CDBG request is for
$25080009 The remaining project casts will be provided from
College Properties, Inc., from Northwestern College,. from
additional fund raising, and potentially from City of
Roseville tax increment financing. This protect will benefit
low and moderate income seniors because the project will
offer rents which will be affordable to low and moderate
i i-i cone persons.
2. Northwest Counseling C�� *er
The requested funds will be used to provide slid"ng fee
mental health services to low income, uninsured, and under
insured residents. The services provided will benefit low
and moderate income persons and reach high risk target groups
(ages 10-m24 not served by any other local agency), Nom hwest
Youth and Family Services is requesting $41,493 or of
its total budget of $534,979, Add: t ional funds . � 1 be
provided from Hennepin and Ramsey Counties, the Minnesota
Jobs, and Training, and from mine of ten Ramsey County cities
that the counseling center serves.
3a Young Fathers Prof eft
Northwest youth and Family services is requesting funds to
provide services to 36 young fathers, b i -._- : een the ages , o f 1
and 2 3 from F w -- sey Cc- -qty* The goal is to enable young
fathers to provide an effective emotional, developmental, and
financial support to their children. CDBG funds are
appropriate because the young father project benefits low and
moderate incomes and reaches a high risk target group not
currently served by other agencies* A total of $19,598 is
requested out of a total project cost of $41,,528, other
fonds will come from grants from various foundations and
from funds allocated by various cities served by Northwest
Youth and Family Service*
EXTRACT of MINUTES of MEETING 'OF THE
CITY COUNCIL of THE CITY of ROE I TE
Pursuant to due call and notice therdof, a meeting of the City Council
of the City of Roseville, County of Ramsey Minnesota was duly held on
the Sth day of March, 1993 at 7 :30 F *M
The following members were present:
and the following were absent:
Member moved that the following resolution be adopted:
RESOLUTION NO .
RICE camzx CROSSING'S PROJECT
WHEREA ,v the proposed Rice Creek Crossings Project will result in the
clearance and redevelopment of an existing blighted site in the
community; and
WHEREAS, the Rice Creek Crossings Project will result in the provision
of needed alternative housing opportunities for low and moderate income
senior citizens; and
WHEREAS, the proposed Rice Creek Crossings Project would provide housing
consistent with the needs outlined in the Maxfield tudyf and
WHEREAS the proposed Rice Creek Crossings. Project will be consistent-
with- the Vista 2 000 Hous ing ' Committee recommendations regarding having
affordable rental uni
of a regular meeting of said City Council held on the � day of
1992, with the original thereof on file in my office.
WITNESS MY HAND officially as such Manager this day of � 1992m
Stevan ar] o z y , City anagar
BEAD
EXTRACT OF MINUTES OF MEETING of THE
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RO EVI ISLE
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a meeting of the city council
of the city of Roseville, County of Ramsey, Minnesota was duly held on
the 8th day of March, 1993 at 7:30 R * M
The following members were present*
and the following were absent
Member moved that the following resolution be adopted:
RESOLUTION NC . If
No ST COUNSELING CENTER REQUEST FOR FC T S To SUPPORT
MENTAL NTH PROGRAMS
WHEREAS, the Northwest Youth and Family Services /Northwest Counseling
Center provides needed mental health programs to Roseville residents;
and
WHEREAS, the Northwest Counseling Center provides services to benefit
low and moderate income persons and
WHEREAS, the Northwest Counseling Center services to high risk taro}
groups which are not served by any other agency.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City of Roseville hereby
supports the Northwest Youth and Family Services/Northwest 'Counseling
Center mental health programs and recommends that it be funded b Ramsey
County with Community Development Block Grant funds.
The emotion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly.
seconded by Member , and upon a gate being taken thereon, the
following vote in favor thereof:
and the following voted against the same:
HEREUPON said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
j SS
COUNTY OF RAMSEY }
I, the undersigned; being the duly qualified City Manager of the City of
Roseville, County of Ramsay, State of Minnesota, do hereby certify that
I have carefully compared the attached and foregoing extract of minutes
of a regular meeting of said City Council held on the day of
1992, with the original thereof on file in my office.
4
WITNESS ICY HAND officially as such Manager this ` day ' of r 1992m
Steven R. Sarkozy, City Manager
SEAL
EXTRACT of MINUTES of MEETING of THE
CITY COUNCIL of THE CITY OF RO EVILLE
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a meeting of the City Council
of the City of Roseville, County of Ramsey, Minnesota was duly held on
the 8th day of March, 1993 at 7*30 P.Me
The following members were present:.
and the following were absent
Member proved that the following resolution be adopted:
RESOLUTION KO .
NORTHWEST YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES YOUNG FATHERS PROTECT
WHEREAS the Northwest. Youth and Family Services Young Fathers Project
will provide needed services to young fathers in Roseville and Ramsey
County; and
WHEREAS , the young f athers p roj ect will provide bene f its to low and
moderate income persons; and
WHEREAS p the young fathers project will provide 'services to high risk
target groups which are not served by any other agency*
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, . that the City of Roseville hereby
supports the Northwest Youth and Family Services Young Fathers Project
and recommends that it be funded -by Ramsey County . with Community
Development Block Grant funds.
The motion for the adoption- of the foregoing resolutioh was duly
seconded by Member and upon a vote being taken thereon, the
following vote in favor thereof e
and the following voted against the same:
WHEREUPON said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
SS
COUNTY OF RAMSEY )
I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified City Manager of the City of
Roseville County of Ragas ey f State of Minnesota, do hereby certify that
I have carefully compared the attached and foregoing extract of minutes
of a regul ar ' meeting of said City Council held on the day of ,
1992, with the original thereof oh file in my office
WITNESS MY BAND officially as such Manager this � day of r 1992;
Steven R. Sarkoz, City Manager
SEAL
TABLE O.70 —B— GRADING PERMIT FEES
201 to 1000 cubic yards-$22.50 for the first 200 cubic yards plus
$10.50 for each additional 100 cubic yards or fraction thereof.
1001 to 10,000 cubic yards-$117.00 for the first 1000 cubic yards,
pius 9e00 for each additional 1,000 cubic yards or fraction
thereo f .
10,001 to 100,000 cubic yards - $198.00 for the first 10,000 cubic
yards, plus $40.50 for each additional 10,000 cubic yards or
fraction thereof •
100,001 cubic yards or more-$562,50 5o for the first 100,000 cubic
yards, plus $22-.50 for each additional 10,000 cubic yards or
fraction thereof
fixer Inspections and Feese
1. Inspections outside of normal business hrs . ., . . M l $30.00 hr.
(minimum charge -two hours)
2. Reinspection fees assessed under provisions of
Section 305( g) was 000.,.O■i,.41+iAh .11,$30,,00 hr,
3. Inspections for which no fee is
specif ically indicated.. * 16 a h R 46 41, ■ s
$30,00 hr.
Or the total hourly cost to the jurisdiction, whichever is the
greatest. This cost shall include supervision, overhead,
equipment, hourly wages and fringe benefits of the employees
involved.
CITY OF ROSEVILLE Fermi t
2660 Civic Center Drive Permit Fee
Roseville, MST 55113 Deposit
Phone 490 -2239 TOTAL
Receipt
Date
APPLICATION
EXCAVATING a, GRADING OR FILL PERMIT
Legal Description of Property:
Site Address
Owner ,? s
Name Address
City/State � hone
Fill. Contractor v s
Name Address
City/State Phone #
Number of Acres
Approximate amount of Fill
Type of Fill
City of Roseville reserves the right to cancel this permit at any
time due to contaminated or unauthorized type of fill.
011 OR 004p Ip FOR CITY USE OR__Y
Number of Site Flan
Starting Date F3.na l Completion Date
Type of Erosion Control required
Number of Inspections Required
y W
Fill Application
Page 2
Performance Bond /Letter of Credit
@ $5.00 per cubic yard of fill material.
Deposit for Erosion Control
$700 *00 Per Acre.
IF the undersigned accept the terms and conditions of the
regulations of the City of Roseville and agree to fully comply
therewith to the satisfaction of the City of Roseville*
Property Owner
City Engineer
Asst. Cc unity veve Direcror
Date
Chief Building Official