Laserfiche WebLink
After six months of monitoring water usage, the following <br />conclusions were made: <br />COST SAVINGS PER HOUSEHOLD <br />-dual Benef its <br />Total <br />41,55 <br />64.09 <br />12.23 <br />'17.98 <br />PAYBACK ANALYSIS - 100% FUNDED By HOMEOWNER <br />Installed by others Installed by Homeowners <br />Annual <br />S Saved <br />Saved <br />S Saved <br />Device <br />Gal,—Saved <br />■ W (Water) <br />S ewe i <br />En er yR <br />Unit Cost <br />Payback <br />Toilet Insert <br />11,008 <br />$14-72 <br />S26-94 <br />�- <br />Shower -Head <br />89261 <br />11t04 <br />20.20 <br />$32.55 <br />Aerators (bath & kitchen) <br />_ 3.232 <br />4,32 <br />i . 91 <br />5,00 <br />. Totals <br />229501 <br />$30,08 <br />$55.05 <br />$32,55 <br />Total <br />41,55 <br />64.09 <br />12.23 <br />'17.98 <br />PAYBACK ANALYSIS - 100% FUNDED By HOMEOWNER <br />Installed by others Installed by Homeowners <br />The benefit to the homeowner is quite significant. With the money saved by tale <br />reduction in sewer, water and energy (hot water) bills , the three .devices will <br />pay for themselves in only 8.25 months . This is if the homeowner purchases the <br />devices. . <br />For r the Water Util i ty g less water means fewer chemical and pumping costs. loo r <br />these two expenses the Utility would save 11.73 cents per billing unit of mater <br />conserved. Using an annual mater use reduction of 22,500 gallons and an <br />installation cost of $80 per household, the devices would have a payback time of <br />nearly 23 years. This, however, does not take into account X $690 of lost <br />revenue to the Utility over those 23 years. 0(w <br />MW 2 .6 <br />Annual <br />Device <br />Savings <br />unit Cost <br />Payback <br />Unit Cost <br />Payback <br />Toilet Insert <br />41,66 <br />$45.00 <br />13.0 mos. <br />$29.95 <br />8. 5 mos. <br />Shower Head <br />54f09 <br />30.00 <br />5.5 mos. <br />11.00 <br />2,1 mos. <br />Aerators <br />12.23 <br />5,00 <br />5. 0 mos. <br />5100 <br />4.9 mos. <br />Total. <br />$117-98 <br />$80,00 <br />8.25 noes ■ <br />Irrill 45* 95 <br />MW <br />4+ 1 MOS. <br />The benefit to the homeowner is quite significant. With the money saved by tale <br />reduction in sewer, water and energy (hot water) bills , the three .devices will <br />pay for themselves in only 8.25 months . This is if the homeowner purchases the <br />devices. . <br />For r the Water Util i ty g less water means fewer chemical and pumping costs. loo r <br />these two expenses the Utility would save 11.73 cents per billing unit of mater <br />conserved. Using an annual mater use reduction of 22,500 gallons and an <br />installation cost of $80 per household, the devices would have a payback time of <br />nearly 23 years. This, however, does not take into account X $690 of lost <br />revenue to the Utility over those 23 years. 0(w <br />MW 2 .6 <br />