2003_1215_packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

I Extract from Draft Planning Commission Minutes of December 3, 2003 meeting: 3 6a. plannine File 3540: bequest by Jim Badzinski for a variance to Section 11116 *16A 4 (placement of Structures on Lots), 1016.16D1 (additional Structure Standards for 5 all Districts), and 1016.2203 (Dion- conformities) of the Roseville City Code to allow 6 the replacement and expansion of a deck within the required shoreland setback and 7 bluff impact zone, on property located at 381 South Owasso Boulevard. 9 Chair Mulder opened the hearing and requested the City Planner present a verbal summary of the 10 staff report dated December 3 } 2003. 11 12 Thomas Paschke (City Planner) indicated the staff recommended approval of a modified deck 13 proposal based on the findings in the project report dated December 3, 2003, and on contingent upon p applicant's compliance with the following conditions: 15 16 a. The deck being a maximum size of 12 feet by 12 feet. 17 b. The property owner locating and identifying in the field the to p of bluff on the 18 parcel for use by the City in determining the required setback. 19 C. The deck having a minimum setback of 12 feet from the to f bluff. 0 The d p o deck having a minimum setback of 36 feet from the ordinary high 1 watermark. 22 e. The deck must remain an open -air deck — in the futurc no enclosure of this 23 deck as a screen porch or expanded living area to the principal structure will be 4 permitted. Shrubs and perennials must be planted between the bluff` and the deck to screen 6 the deck and provide a visual enhancement. 7 28 Member Stone asked if there were watershed issues (no, but the MnDNR will be reviewin g the 9 application prior to a Council action). 30 31 Member peper asked if the deck could be 16 feet wide but only 12 feet towards the lake. Thomas 32 paschke explained some neighbor concerns and 12'x 12' would have less impact act on the edge of 33 the bluff. 34 35 Mr. Badzinski, owner who lives next door} noted the existing deck is an eye sore and unsafe. He 36 would accept a 12'x 1 2 } deck as proposed by the staff. 37 38 Member Bakeman asked how long it has been owned by applicant (1.5 years). what other 39 improvements have or are being done` (New garage new basement, interior remodeling). 40 41 No comments were offered from the public. 4 43 Chair Mulder closed the hearing. 44 45 Motion: Member Peper moved, seconded by Member Traynor, to recommend approval of a 39 46 foot Variance to Section 1016.16A (placement of Structures on Dots), a Variance to Section 47 101 6-16B 1 (Additional Structure Standards for All Districts), and a 18 foot Variance to Section 48 1016.22 3 onconformities) of the Roseville City Code, to allow a 12 foot by 12 foot deck to 49 the horse at 381 Owasso Boulevard South, based on the findings of Section 5 and conditions of 50 Section 6 of the project report dated December 3, 2003. 51