2003_1117_packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Other Issues Historically the City Council has appointed someone to fill a vacancy. That process has worked for more than 5 o years} why should it change now. When doing research on this issue, the League of Minnesota Cities had little information. Generally cities with charters may have a provision allowing for a special election, but not requiring it. I looked at 12 cities in the metro area, and only Minneapolis has specific language. Both Fridley and St. Paul had permissive language but did not rewire a special election. Some people have argued that Craig Klausing is appointing his own successor. I would argue differently. The City Council appoints the person to fill the vacancy. The voters gave their trust to City Council members and gage them the authority to make that decision when they elected the Council members to office. Voters knew that Mr, Klausing would have that responsibility, but the majority of voters obviously trust that he would select a good replacement. I answered that specific question dozens of times and several letters to the editor and campaign pieces discussed this very issue, so the public knew what they were voting for when they Voted. I must add that planning and coordinating an election is extremely time consuming and stressful. I would forgo other- job responsibilities if I had to coordinate an additional election. Timing of the Special Election If Council members feel strongly about holding a special election, I would recommend hold it in conjunction with the September primary (and perhaps forgo a "primary "'). By state statute the Council must appoint a replacement. That person would at the most nine months before a Council Member is elected would tape over the job. If the City waited until September we would be assured of a higher voter turnout and the City would not incur extra costs since we will conduct the primary for state and National offices.