Laserfiche WebLink
I Planninir File 3515: Request by Michael Davis, 2730 Griggs Street for a <br />2 Conditional Use Permit in accordance with Section 1004.01A4 and a <br />3 variance to Section 1004.01A3 Detached Accessory Building Size) and <br />4 Section 1004.01A6 (Maximum Total Surface Area) of the Roseville City <br />5 Code to allow the construction of a 30 foot by 34 foot (1,020 sq, ftj detached <br />6 accessory building. <br />7 <br />Chairman Duncan opened the hearing and requested City Planning Thomas Paschke to present <br />9 verbal summary of the staff report dated September 3, 2003. <br />City Planner Paschke explained that Michael Davis, 2730 Griggs Street, seeps approval of a <br />12 Conditional Use Permit and a Variance to Section 1004.01A3 (Detached Accessory Building <br />13 Size) of the Roseville City Code to allow the construction of a 1,020 sq. ft. detached accessory <br />14 building in the rear yard. <br />15 <br />16 Michael Davis has submitted a proposal to construct a detached accessory building on his lot. The <br />17 structure, a 30 foot by 34 foot (1,020 sq. ft) detached garage would be located in the general <br />18 location of the existing detached garage on the premises. The City Code limits detached <br />19 accessory buildings to a maximum size of 1,008 sq. ft. and impervious coverage to 30% of the lot <br />20 area. In this case, the proposed 1,020 sq. ft. detached accessary building is 12 sq. ft. more than <br />1 allowed by the Code with a Conditional Use Pennit, and the total impervious surface coverage for <br />the parcel upon completion of the proposed improvements is estimated at 3,534 sq. ft. or 530 sq. <br />3 ft. above the parcels allotment. <br />4 <br />25 The Davis home was constructed in 1954 and lies on a 10,013 square foot abet by 133.5 feet) <br />6 lot. The lot has an impervious coverage allowance of 3,004 sq. f1 and a rear yard allowance of <br />7 900 sq. f. The parcel currently includes a house foundation size of 1,091 sq. f1; an existing <br />8 detached accessory building side of 572 sq. f1.; existing driveway of 1,423 sq. f1; all totaling <br />9 3,086 sq. ft or 82 sq. ft. more that the City Code allows for the Davis parcel. The Davis parcel is <br />30 10,013 square feet in size, affording 3,002 square feet of impervious coverage. Built before the <br />31 30% surface coverage requirement, the existing improvements (principal structure — 1,091 sq f1., <br />32 driveway — 1,423 sq. ft., detached garage 572 sq. f1.) exceed the requirement of the Code by 82 <br />33 square fee (currently 31 %). <br />34 Mr. Paschke reviewed the development proposal with regard to the criteria in Section 1013.01.D <br />3 (Conditional Use Permit) of the Roseville Zoning Ordinance and has concluded the proposal <br />36 meets these criteria. Specifically, a detached accessory building is a permitted use in an R -1 <br />37 District. The proposed detached garage will not create additional tram b or the need for additional <br />38 public facilities. with proper exterior building treatment, drainage, and landscaping, the building <br />39 will not have an impact on surrounding property or values. Where appears to be no impact on <br />general health, safety, and public welfare. In addition, the project complies with the <br />Comprehensive Plan designation as low - density residential uses. The City Planner reviewed the <br />42 development proposal with regard to variance standards and determined that it is difficult to <br />43 justify a departure from the strict application of the City Code allowing the applicant to construct <br />44 the proposed detached 1,020 sq. ft detached accessory building. However, there is justification for <br />45 reducing the size of the replacement garage to a size closer to the 900 sq. ft rear yard maximum <br />46 afforded the parcel. Specifically, a 32 foot by 30 foot (960 sq. f1.) detached accessory building <br />47 designed with attic trusses would reduce overall impervious coverage by 60 sq. ft. and be nearer <br />48 to the rear yard allowance, but more importantly, the design would still afford Mr. Davis a three <br />49 car garage with ample interior storage area for the items indicated. <br />50 <br />