Laserfiche WebLink
City Manager's 2004 Budget Recommendations <br />I note here at the beginning of this Report, and will reiterate at the end, <br />that Department Heads recognize the need to balance our budget but <br />would deeply regret cutting programs and services* They also differ on <br />some spending priorities. <br />B. our Buil ng Prgj ect and an HRA Lgn Will Create New Tax - <br />Rayer Costs. <br />Also as a part of this Introduction, we all need to reflect on two new in- <br />creases in local tax costs at the same time the City is losing a significant <br />t <br />amount of state funding to help us operate. These new costs relate to our <br />building project and our Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA). <br />In November, 2002, the Voters approved the bonds for our police and <br />Public works Building Project. The city estimated and publicized before <br />that bond election the property tax impact of approving those bonds. Our <br />estimate was a bond interest cost equal to 10% a of the average Roseville <br />property owner's 2002 local taxes. <br />Now that we have sold these Toter- approved bonds we know our estimate <br />was accurate. Roseville has an excellent credit rating, earning us a low <br />interest rate on these bonds. But the annual debt service for our $9.7 <br />million in bonds for our Building Project, even at favorable interest rates, <br />is an additional $875,000 in City costs per year. <br />We also estimate our costs of operating the new Police and Public Works <br />facilities (mostly utility costs) will be about $100,000 per year. <br />In addition, I expect that our H RA will recommend to you that the City <br />Council authorize a $400,000 H1RA levy for 2004. This would be another <br />new cost for Roseville taxpayer's to handle. <br />C, §UMMaK79 <br />To summarize this Introduction, the city will lose another $700,000 in <br />state funds next year, 2004, to support City services at the same time <br />taxpayers in Roseville will be facing $1,375,000 in new local tax costs -- <br />875,000 in new debt costs, $100,000 in new utility and building opera- <br />tion costs, and $400,000 in a new HFAA levy. This is not an easy budget <br />to balance. The following assumptions don't help either. <br />r <br />