My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2003_0915_packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2003
>
2003_0915_packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/20/2011 4:47:27 PM
Creation date
10/20/2011 4:15:27 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
333
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
k*Sfi► <br />v _ J� J <br />Request for Council Actiol <br />Date: 2003 <br />Item r . A. <br />Department Approval Manager Approval Agenda Section <br />Item Description: <br />Consider Changing the City's Recycling Contract with waste Management <br />Background <br />At your August 18 meeting, you asked that this item be placed on the September 15 meeting agenda. Some of <br />you had questions you wanted waste Management to answer about changing the contract. I sent waste <br />Management a letter asking those questions. See Attachment 1. waste Management responded with a letter. <br />Sec Attachment 2. <br />In addition, the City has received phone and e-mail messages regarding recycling. Sec Attachment 3. <br />Our current contract with waste Management continues our existing two -sort recycling service in most of the <br />pity, but provides for a single - stream pilot project in part of the City. <br />The contract addendum suggested by waste Management proposes that the City begin citywide single- stream <br />recycling this winter, (At your request, the City Attorney has also drafted a contract addendum in case you <br />decide to move to single- stream recycling immediately. That addendum is attached as well. The City Attorney <br />can describe the differences between the addendum Waste Management proposes and the one the City Attorney <br />drafted.) <br />Financial Impact: <br />Single- stream recycling is more expensive than two -sort recycling. <br />Council Action Requested: <br />Either: <br />1. Take no action,, which leaves the existing recycling contract in place (meaning we contmnue two -sort <br />recycling in most of the City, but we have WM conduct a single - stream pilot project in part of the City), <br />or <br />2. Approve a motion adopting the waste Management contract addendum or the addendum drafted by the <br />City Attorney (meaning the entire City changes to single - stream recycling this winter). <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.