2003_0818_packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Excerpt of Draft Minutes from August 6 Planning Commission meeting: 2 h. Planninti File 3508= bequest by James and Marian . orf for a variance to 3 Section 1004.01 A (Maximum Total Surface Area) and 4 (Dwelling Dimensions — Front Yard Setback) of the Roseville lle City Code 5 to allow the installation of a new porch on the front (south) and side (west) 6 of their home at 1407 Burke Avenue W. 7 8 Chairman Jinn Mulder opened the hearing and requested City Planner Thomas Paschke to provide a verbal summary of the staff written report dated August 6, 2003. to Ir. Paschke indicated that Marian and ,lames Dorf, 1047 Burke Avenue, were seeping 12 approval of a variance to Section 1004.01 A (Maximum Total Surface Area) and 13 (Exception) of the Roseville City Code to allow the construction of a porch on 14 to the front (south) and side (west) of their home. 15 16 Thomas Paschke advised that based on the information provided and the findings in 17 Section 5 of the project report dated August 6, 2003, the Planning staff` recommends 18 approval of a 575 square foot (5%) variance to Section 1004.01A6 and a 7 foot 6 inch 19 variance to Section 1004.01 E of the Roseville City Code for Marian and ,Tames Korf to o allow the construction of a front and side porch on to their horne at 1047 Burke Avenue, 1 subject to the following conditions: 22 a. The parcel being limited to an impervious coverage maximum of 3,577 23 square feet or 35 %. 4 b. The porch addition being limited to the size indicated on the submitted 25 Mans, including being limited to a 7 foot 6 inch extension on the front 6 (south) of the home and a 5 foot 4 inch extension one the side (west) on 7 the home. C. Gutters and downspouts must be installed along the eves of the porch to 9 direct runoff into the front and side yard of the parcel. 30 d. The review and approval of a building permit must be consistent with the 31 approved plans and variances, 3 33 There were no comments from the applicant. Chair Mulder closed the hearing. 34 35 Motion: Member Stone moved, seconded by Member 13 akernan, to recommend 36 approval of a 575 square foot (5 %) variance to Section 1004.01 A6 (Maximum Total 37 Surface Area) of the Roseville City Code, based on the findings of Section 5 and 38 conditions of Section 6 of the project report dated August 6, 2003 39 40 Ayes: 5 41 lays: o 42 Motion carried, 43 44 Motion: Member Stone moved, seconded by Member Peper, to recommend approval of � r 45 a 7 foot, 6 inch, variance to Section 1004.01E (Exception) of the Roseville City Code,