2003_0818_packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

l Gutters and downspouts must be installed along the eves of the garage and living area addition to properly direct runoff into the front and rear yard. D. windows being installed on the west and east sides of the building wall of the new garage, per the submitted elevation drawing. E, The review and approval of a building permit must be consistent with the approved glans and variances. 7.0 PLANNING OMMI SSION ACTION: 7.1 on August 6, 2003, the Roseville Planning Commission held the public hearing regarding the Paal variance request. At the hearing no citizens addressed the Conmitission, but the Commission did have questions of Staff and the applicant. Specifically, the Planning Commission was interested in the decision to process a 6 inch variance and not a Setback Permit} whether the garage addition could be placed on the rear of the existing attached garage; and whether a detached garage could be constructed. 7.2 The applicant, James Paal addressed the Commission indicating the options for an attached two stall garage are very limited, He explained that a detached garage would require a lot coverage variance, challenges for driveway location} and a driveway close to 100 feet in length. Mr. Paal also indicated that the addition onto the existing garage was 3 feet in width and for futurre living area use. The existing garage /addition would be used as parking and storage. 7.3 The City Planner stated that Staff now includes all encroachments that could qualify for a Setback Permit with encroachments that require variance to elevate time, but more importantly because a project must be reviewed and approved as a complete package. 7.4 The ornrnission asked Staff whether a condition was necessary to make certain the windows being required in the stated conditions would be similar to those proposed on the drawings. The City Planner indicated that the Conunission could add a condition requiring windows on the west and east side of the new attached garage, per the elevation plans submitted. 7.5 The Planning Conurnission voted (5 -0) to recommend approval of a variance to Section 1004.01 E and 1004.02D5 of the Roseville City Code based on the findings of Section 5 and conditions of Section 6, of the project report dated August 6, 2003, and an added condition requiring windows being installed on the west and east building wall of the new attached garage similar to those identified on the elevation plan submitted with the variance request. PF3503 — RCA 08 1803 - Page 5 of 6