Laserfiche WebLink
RecycHngin Selected Areas in Relation to Single -- Stream <br />Listed in alphabetically order <br />Brooklyn Park & ERG population 140,131 <br />They were the first cities to switch to single stream. Set out rates were around 0% before; <br />now they are 71% oseville }s is 65 %). It needed a program to appeal to a rapidly <br />growing, younger population without established recycling habits. Believes single- strum <br />has been effective. Concerned that promised cost swings have yet to materialize. <br />Little Canada population 9,971 <br />It signed a contract with a consortium of haulers including waste Management in 2002 for <br />two stream collection. It has no plans to charge that contract. <br />Minneapolis population 382,618 <br />Source separated. It refuses to consider single strum because of concerns about <br />contaminated material. Contract with BFI specifies a residual rate of less than I%. It has <br />profit sharing and a higher residual rate would cut into profits. <br />Minnetonka population 51,301 <br />It signed a contract with Waste Management to switch to two - stream; It has no plans to <br />conduct a single - strewn pilot. It is concerned about increased residual rates with single <br />stream and about authenticity of the current residual rates being reported to it from. w . <br />St. Paul population 287,151 <br />Source separated switching to two- stream. It conducted a nationally acclaimed study of <br />recycling collection methods including source separated, two - strewn and single stream. <br />Found two - stream with weekly collection to be the best method. It tennlnated its contract <br />with waste Management in part because of concerns about WM's processing plant. Just <br />signed a 1 0-year contract extension in which rates are anticipated to go up only 1 % over <br />teen years (waste Management is proposing to increase Roseville rates by 15% in the first <br />year and 3 % a year after that). <br />Shoreviiew population 25,924 <br />Earlier this year waste Management agreed to re -open its contract and lower the rate for <br />two- stream collection, waste Management threatened to walk away from its contract <br />Mess Shoreview agreed to switch from a ore -day collection to a five -day zone system <br />similar to Roseville. waste Management needed the changes in order to deal with staff <br />cuts following the loss of the St. Paul contract. <br />