My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2003_0728_packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2003
>
2003_0728_packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/21/2011 10:27:15 AM
Creation date
10/21/2011 10:14:47 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
153
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I' r I I <br />DRAFT Minutes - Page 4 <br />Mayor Kysylyczyn requested comment from audience <br />member, Al Sands regarding past City TIF practice <br />regarding relocation of homeowners for a redevelopment <br />project. <br />Mayor Kysylyczyn echoed those concerns expressed by <br />Councilmembers during discussion; and stated that his <br />decision for making a favorable judgment for the <br />developer was partly based on his specific question of the <br />developer when previously before the City Council <br />regarding any need for public financial assistance, with the <br />developer's response being negative. <br />Mr. VanSlyke advised that in his conversations with a <br />majority of current tenants, their preference would be to <br />remain in the community based on their existing customer <br />base. <br />Mayor Kysylyczyn summarized Council consensus to not <br />support the request to proceed with use of TIF funding at <br />this time. Mayor Kysylyczyn encouraged the developer to <br />return provide additional material to the Council at their <br />discretion for further consideration, but reiterated the <br />Council consensus to not proceed at this point. <br />Councilmember Maschka questioned whether the Housing <br />and Redevelopment Authority (HRA) could provide <br />assistance to the project. <br />Community Development Director Welsh responded that <br />involvement would need to be through a Redevelopment, <br />rather than a Housing Tax Increment District, thus <br />requiring City Council, not HRA processing. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.