My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2003_0728_packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2003
>
2003_0728_packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/21/2011 10:27:15 AM
Creation date
10/21/2011 10:14:47 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
153
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City Manager's 2004 Budget Recommendations <br />C. Try Volunjga Deductions First, <br />When we talked about the budget this April, the Finance Director and <br />recommended some alternatives. Rather than layoffs, we recommended <br />some early - retirement and other incentive programs to reduce our staff. <br />According to Paul Kirkwold, Ramsey county Manager, Ramsey County <br />has had great success with its early - retirement program as a way of deal- <br />ing with their budget crisis brought on by the state's funding cuts. <br />To summarize those April recommendations from the Finance Director <br />and myself, for thirty to sixty days allow city employees to consider earl <br />retirement and voluntary resignation programs in lieu of layoffs. Yes, <br />those voluntary programs cost some money to implement. It is also true <br />that those kinds of incentive programs may produce a disproportionate <br />loss of experienced staff whose departure may temporaril y hurt produc- <br />tivity. Additionally, stuff departures under those binds of voluntary re- <br />duction programs may not be as strategic as layoffs. olunt ary programs <br />depend on staff stepping forward to tale advantage of those rains • ro <br />p g <br />thus, the gaps in our staffing under a voluntary program would be based <br />on an employee's personal circumstances and choice rather than on our <br />evaluation of the tax cost or public participation or public par- <br />ticular act of <br />p <br />titular clt programs. <br />That said, such voluntary incentive programs do spare good ees ern to <br />p y <br />from being laid off and they build substantial operating savings over the <br />long run as vacated city positions are not filled. <br />Attached for your review is our April 7th Request for Council Action de- <br />scribing these voluntary incentives t <br />Hence, you could choose to follows first, those earlier recommendations <br />and see what kind of savings we can achieve on a voluntary basis. Then <br />you would still have time later this year to re- evaluate the budget situa- <br />tion and male other budget cuts, if necessary. <br />6I` I <br />In light of the assumptions and principles and reasons and alternatives <br />set forth above, I recommend cutting the city's operating budget b <br />g ap- <br />proximately $350,000 for 2004. Some members of the Community will <br />undoubtedly and justifiably appose some of the specific recommenda- <br />tions in this Report. Former city councils would not have authorized alf <br />of these programs and services in the first place if these elected represen- <br />tatives of the people didn't think current programs and services respond <br />15 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.