2003_0721_packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

building lines that are not �Lel to pry lines that in turn affects how and where additions can be placed without irn acting mini = standards of the Code, The .,� - . ornmurdty Development Staff has determined that the plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner. . The variance, if ranted, will not alter the essential character of the locality: The improvement proposed for the Casper hone will not be out of character or context of a split lever home built in 1980's; will have little or no impact on the adjacent (southeast) parcel} and more ffi"rtantly will be in keeping with today}s designs and family accommodations. The Community Development Staff has determined that this variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality, nor adversely affect the public health, safety, or general welfare, of the city or adjacent properties. 6.0 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: 6,1 used on the information provided and the findings in Section 5 of this project report, the Community Development Staff recommends approval of a 11 foot VARLANCE to Section 1004.02D5 of the Roseville City Code for Karen Casper to allow the construction of a two level addition including a seen porch (lower lever and four - season porch (upper lever on to the northeast corner (rear) of home at 2508 Marion Street, subject to the following conditions: A. The property owner must locate the lot's property pins (or provide a survey) and based on that, develop a scaled site plan with dimensions for screened porch and four - season parch addition, allowing the Community Development Department to verify proper placement of the structure on the parcel. B. gutters must be installed along the eves of the addition and directed to the northeast corner of the parcel, to reduce impacts to adjacent residential properties. The mview and approval of a building permit must be consistent with the approved plans and variance. 7.0 PLANNING oMMISSION ACTION: 7.1 On July 9, 2003, the Roseville Planning Commission held the public hearing regarding the Casper variance request. At the hearing no citizens addressed the Comm- fission and the City Planner indicated that he had not received any calls or email regarding the request. The City Planner did note a correction in the proposed request, which added two feet on to the requested variance. 7.2 The planning Commission voted (5-0) to recommend approval of the request for an I I foot VARLkNCE to Section 1004.02D5 of the Roseville City Code by Caren Casper, 2508 Marion Street, to allow construction of a scmen and four season porch on to the rear of their PF3492 f---- FICA 072103 - Paige 4 of 5